Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery disease: Fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided

JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 3, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 812-817

  Nam, Chang Wook ^a   Yoon, Hyuck Jun ^a   Cho, Yun Kyeong ^a   Park, Hyoung Seob ^a   Kim, Hyungseop ^a   Hur, Seung Ho ^a   Kim, Yoon Nyun ^a   Chung, In Sung ^a   Koo, Bon Kwon ^b   Tahk, Seung Jae ^c   Fearon, William F ^d   Kim, Kwon Bae ^a  

^a Dongsan Medical Center   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Ajou University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

coronary angiography; fractional flow reserve; intravascular ultrasound; outcome; percutaneous coronary intervention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77956691119     PISSN: 19368798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.04.016     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Topol EJ, Nissen SE. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1995;92:2333-42.
2. Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation 2001;103:2928-34.
3. Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC Jr., et al. 2009 focused updates: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention (updating the 2005 guideline and 2007 focused update) a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:2205-41.
4. Fearon WF, Takagi A, Jeremias A, et al. Use of fractional myocardial flow reserve to assess the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenoses. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:1013-4.
5. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2105-11.
6. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al., on behalf of FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360:213-24.
7. Briguori C, Anzuini A, Airoldi F, et al. Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 2001;87:136-41.
8. Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al. Long-term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was not performed based on intravascular ultrasound findings: importance of lumen dimensions. Circulation 1999;100:256-61.
9. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1703-8.
10. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Bartunek J, et al. Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Circulation 2001;104: 157-62.
11. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American College of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37:1478-92.
12. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al., on behalf of Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 2007;115:2344-51.
13. Little WC, Constantinescu M, Applegate RJ, et al. Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? Circulation 1988;78:1157-66.
14. Tousoulis D, Davies G, Stefanadis C, Toutouzas P. Can angiography predict the vulnerable lesion that progress to myocardial infarction? J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:261-2.
15. Hoye A, Lemos PA, Arampatzis CA, et al. Effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for coronary narrowings <50% in diameter. Am J Cardiol 2004;94:112-4.
16. Moses JW, Stone GW, Nikolsky E, et al. Drug-eluting stents in the treatment of intermediate lesions: pooled analysis from four randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2164-71.
17. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al., on behalf of COURAGE Study Investigators. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1503-16.
18. Takayama T, Hodgson JM. Prediction of the physiologic severity of coronary lesions using 3D IVUS: validation by direct coronary pressure measurements. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;53:48-55.
19. Costa MA, Sabate M, Staico R, et al. Anatomical and physiologic assessments in patients with small coronary artery disease: final results of the Physiologic and Anatomical Evaluation Prior to and After Stent Implantation in Small Coronary Vessels (PHANTOM) trial. Am Heart J 2007;153:296.e1-7.
20. Takagi A, Tsurumi Y, Ishii Y, Suzuki K, Kawana M, Kasanuki H. Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Circulation 1999;100:250-5.
21. Park KH, Koo BK, Suh JW, et al. Assessment of intermediate coronary stenosis in Koreans using the fractional flow reserve. Korean Circ J 2008;38:468-74.