Alteration/deficiency in activation-3 (Ada3) plays a critical role in maintaining genomic stability

Cell Cycle

Volumn 11, Issue 22, 2012, Pages 4266-4274

  Mirza, Sameer ^a   Katafiasz, Bryan J ^a   Kumar, Rakesh ^d   Wang, Jun ^a   Mohibi, Shakur ^a   Jain, Smrati ^c   Gurumurthy, Channabasavaiah Basavaraju ^a   Pandita, Tej K ^d   Dave, Bhavana J ^a,b,c   Band, Hamid ^a,b   Band, Vimla ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Ada3; ATAC; DNA repair; Nuclear foci; SAGA

Indexed keywords

ADENOVIRUS VECTOR; ALTERATION DEFICIENCY IN ACTIVATION 3; ATM PROTEIN; BINDING PROTEIN; CRE RECOMBINASE; HISTONE H2A; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PHOSPHO 53BP1 PROTEIN; RAD51 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CHROMOSOME DELETION; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA FRAGMENTATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; EMBRYO; FIBROBLAST; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; IONIZING RADIATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; RADIATION RESPONSE;

EID: 84869423477     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.22613     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Rouse J, Jackson SP. Interfaces between the detection, signaling, and repair of DNA damage. Science 2002; 297:547-51; PMID:12142523; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1074740.
2. Zhou BB, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 2000; 408:433-9; PMID:11100718; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ 35044005.
3. Khanna KK, Jackson SP. DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection. Nat Genet 2001; 27:247-54; PMID:11242102; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/85798.
4. Pierce AJ, Jasin M. NHEJ deficiency and disease. Mol Cell 2001; 8:1160-1; PMID:11885597; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00424-5.
5. Hartlerode AJ, Scully R. Mechanisms of double-strand break repair in somatic mammalian cells. Biochem J 2009; 423:157-68; PMID:19772495; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20090942.
6. Kastan MB, Bartek J. Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer. Nature 2004; 432:316-23; PMID:15549093; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03097.
7. Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 2009; 461:1071-8; PMID:19847258; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature08467.
8. Guirouilh-Barbat JK, Wilhelm T, Lopez BS. AKT1/BRCA1 in the control of homologous recombination and genetic stability: the missing link between hereditary and sporadic breast cancers. Oncotarget 2010; 1:691-9; PMID:21321378.
9. Schultz LB, Chehab NH, Malikzay A, DiTullio RA Jr., Stavridi ES, Halazonetis TD. The DNA damage checkpoint and human cancer. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2000; 65:489-98; PMID:12760066; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/sqb. 2000.65.489.
10. Xie A, Odate S, Chandramouly G, Scully R. H2AX post-translational modifications in the ionizing radiation response and homologous recombination. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:3602-10; PMID:20703100; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.17. 12884.
11. Schafer KA. The cell cycle: a review. Vet Pathol 1998; 35:461-78; PMID:9823588; http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030098589803500601.
12. Li B, Carey M, Workman JL. The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell 2007; 128:707-19; PMID:17320508; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.01. 015.
13. Ho CC, Hau PM, Marxer M, Poon RY. The requirement of p53 for maintaining chromosomal stability during tetraploidization. Oncotarget 2010; 1:583-95; PMID:21317454.
14. Luger K, Mäder AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 1997; 389:251-60; PMID:9305837; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/38444.
15. Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 2007; 128:693-705; PMID:17320507; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.005.
16. Bermejo R, Lai MS, Foiani M. Preventing replication stress to maintain genome stability: resolving conflicts between replication and transcription. Mol Cell 2012; 45:710-8; PMID:22464441; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03. 001.
17. Groth A, Ray-Gallet D, Quivy JP, Lukas J, Bartek J, Almouzni G. Human Asf1 regulates the flow of S phase histones during replicational stress. Mol Cell 2005; 17:301-11; PMID:15664198; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.12. 018.
18. Strahl BD, Allis CD. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 2000; 403:41-5; PMID:10638745; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/47412.
19. Roth SY, Denu JM, Allis CD. Histone acetyltransferases. Annu Rev Biochem 2001; 70:81-120; PMID:11395403; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1. 81.
20. Carrozza MJ, Utley RT, Workman JL, Côté J. The diverse functions of histone acetyltransferase complexes. Trends Genet 2003; 19:321-9; PMID:12801725; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00115-X.
21. Sharma GG, So S, Gupta A, Kumar R, Cayrou C, Avvakumov N, et al. MOF and histone H4 acetylation at lysine 16 are critical for DNA damage response and double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol 2010; 30:3582-95; PMID:20479123; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01476-09.
22. Gupta A, Sharma GG, Young CS, Agarwal M, Smith ER, Paull TT, et al. Involvement of human MOF in ATM function. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:5292-305; PMID:15923642; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.12.5292-5305.2005.
23. Guelman S, Kozuka K, Mao Y, Pham V, Solloway MJ, Wang J, et al. The double-histone-acetyltransferase complex ATAC is essential for mammalian development. Mol Cell Biol 2009; 29:1176-88; PMID:19103755; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/MCB.01599-08.
24. Nagy Z, Tora L. Distinct GCN5/PCAF-containing complexes function as co-activators and are involved in transcription factor and global histone acetylation. Oncogene 2007; 26:5341-57; PMID:17694077; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/sj.onc.1210604.
25. Orpinell M, Fournier M, Riss A, Nagy Z, Krebs AR, Frontini M, et al. The ATAC acetyl transferase complex controls mitotic progression by targeting non-histone substrates. EMBO J 2010; 29:2381-94; PMID:20562830; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.125.
26. Ghosh S, Pugh BF. Sequential recruitment of SAGA and TFIID in a genomic response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2011; 31:190-202; PMID:20956559; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00317-10.
27. Groth A, Rocha W, Verreault A, Almouzni G. Chromatin challenges during DNA replication and repair. Cell 2007; 128:721-33; PMID:17320509; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.030.
28. Burgess RJ, Zhou H, Han J, Zhang Z. A role for Gcn5 in replication-coupled nucleosome assembly. Mol Cell 2010; 37:469-80; PMID:20188666; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.020.
29. Paolinelli R, Mendoza-Maldonado R, Cereseto A, Giacca M. Acetylation by GCN5 regulates CDC6 phosphorylation in the S phase of the cell cycle. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009; 16:412-20; PMID:19343071; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1583.
30. Kumar A, Zhao Y, Meng G, Zeng M, Srinivasan S, Delmolino LM, et al. Human papillomavirus oncoprotein E6 inactivates the transcriptional coactivator human ADA3. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:5801-12; PMID:12138191; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ MCB.22.16.5801-5812.2002.
31. Nag A, Germaniuk-Kurowska A, Dimri M, Sassack MA, Gurumurthy CB, Gao Q, et al. An essential role of human Ada3 in p53 acetylation. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:8812-20; PMID:17272277; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M610443200.
32. Mohibi S, Gurumurthy CB, Nag A, Wang J, Mirza S, Mian Y, et al. Mammalian alteration/deficiency in activation 3 (Ada3) is essential for embryonic development and cell cycle progression. J Biol Chem 2012; 287:29442-56; PMID:22736770; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.378901.
33. Yuan J, Chen J. MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex dictates DNA repair independent of H2AX. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:1097-104; PMID:19910469; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1074/jbc.M109.078436.
34. Langerak P, Russell P. Regulatory networks integrating cell cycle control with DNA damage checkpoints and double-strand break repair. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2011; 366:3562-71; PMID:22084383; http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/ rstb.2011.0070.
35. Huertas P, Cortés-Ledesma F, Sartori AA, Aguilera A, Jackson SP. CDK targets Sae2 to control DNAend resection and homologous recombination. Nature 2008; 455:689-92; PMID:18716619; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07215.
36. Huertas P, Jackson SP. Human CtIP mediates cell cycle control of DNA end resection and double strand break repair. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:9558-65; PMID:19202191; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M808906200.
37. Kumar R, Hunt CR, Gupta A, Nannepaga S, Pandita RK, Shay JW, et al. Purkinje cell-specific males absent on the first (mMof ) gene deletion results in an ataxia-telangiectasia-like neurological phenotype and backward walking in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:3636-41; PMID:21321203; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1016524108.
38. Yamamoto T, Horikoshi M. Novel substrate specificity of the histone acetyltransferase activity of HIV-1-Tat interactive protein Tip60. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:30595-8; PMID:9388189; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.49.30595.
39. Kimura A, Horikoshi M. Tip60 acetylates six lysines of a specific class in core histones in vitro. Genes Cells 1998; 3:789-800; PMID:10096020; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2443.1998.00229.x.
40. Ikura T, Ogryzko VV, Grigoriev M, Groisman R, Wang J, Horikoshi M, et al. Involvement of the TIP60 histone acetylase complex in DNA repair and apoptosis. Cell 2000; 102:463-73; PMID:10966108; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00) 00051-9.
41. Murr R, Loizou JI, Yang YG, Cuenin C, Li H, Wang ZQ, et al. Histone acetylation by Trrap-Tip60 modulates loading of repair proteins and repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:91-9; PMID:16341205; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1343.
42. Downs JA, Allard S, Jobin-Robitaille O, Javaheri A, Auger A, Bouchard N, et al. Binding of chromatinmodifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites. Mol Cell 2004; 16:979-90; PMID:15610740; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.12.003.
43. Todaro GJ, Green H. Quantitative studies of the growth of mouse embryo cells in culture and their development into established lines. J Cell Biol 1963; 17:299-313; PMID:13985244; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.17.2.299.
44. Brown MG, Lawce HJ. Peripheral Blood Cytogenetic Methods. In: Margaret J. Barch (Editor) TKE, Jack Spurbeck (Editor), ed. The AGT laboratory manual: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1997:77-163.
45. Pandita RK, Sharma GG, Laszlo A, Hopkins KM, Davey S, Chakhparonian M, et al. Mammalian Rad9 plays a role in telomere stability, S- and G2-phase-specific cell survival, and homologous recombinational repair. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:1850-64; PMID:16479004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.26.5.1850-1864.2006.