The potential of host community compensation in facility siting

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 11, Issue SUPPL, 2012, Pages 130-138

  ter Mors, Emma ^a   Terwel, Bart W ^a   Daamen, Dancker D L ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attitude; Carbon capture and storage (CCS); Facility siting; Host community compensation; LULU (locally unwanted land use) NIMBY (not in my backyard); Public perception

Indexed keywords

LAND USE;

ATTITUDE; CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGES (CCS); FACILITY SITING; NOT IN MY BACKYARDS; PUBLIC PERCEPTION;

CARBON CAPTURE;

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COMPENSATION SYSTEM; LAND USE; NOT IN MY BACK YARD RESPONSE; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC ATTITUDE;

EID: 84869232485     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Aitken M. Wind power and community benefits: challenges and opportunities. Energy Policy 2010, 38:6066-6075.
2. Ashworth, P., Rodriguez, S., Miller, A., 2010. Case study of the CO2CRC Otway Project. CSIRO research report. http://www.csiro.au/Organisation-Structure/Divisions/Earth-Science--Resource-Engineering/Otway-case-study.aspx.
3. Bacot H., Bowen T., Fitzgerald M.R. Managing the solid waste crisis: exploring the link between citizen attitudes, policy incentives, and siting landfills. Policy Studies Journal 1994, 22:229-244.
4. Bradbury J. Public engagement in CCS: analysis of six U.S. projects. Paper Presented at InCluESEV International Workshop 2011.
5. Bradbury J., Ray I., Peterson T., Wade S., Wong-Parodi G., Feldpausch A. The role of social factors in shaping public perceptions of CCS: results of multi-state focus group interviews in the U.S. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:4665-4672.
6. Brunsting S., Upham P., Dütschke E., De Best Waldhober M., Oltra C., Desbarats J., Riesch H., Reiner D. Communicating CCS: applying communications theory to public perceptions of carbon capture and storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5:1651-1662.
7. Carnes S.A., Copenhaver E.D., Reed J., Soderstrom J.H., Sorenson J.H., Peelle E., Bjornstad D.J. Incentives and the Siting of Radioactive Waste Facilities (ORNL-5880) 1982, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
8. Carnes S.A., Copenhaver E.D., Sorensen J.H., Soderstrom E.J., Reed J.H., Bjornstad D.J., Peelle E. Incentives and nuclear waste siting: prospects and constraints. Energy Systems and Policy 1983, 7:323-351.
9. Claro E. Exchange relationships and the environment: the acceptability of compensation in the siting of waste disposal facilities. Environmental Values 2007, 16:187-208.
10. Devine-Wright P. Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy 2005, 8:125-139.
11. Dütschke E. What drives public acceptance-comparing two cases from Germany. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:6234-6240.
12. Elster J. Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens 1992, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
13. European Commission, 2011. Special Eurobarometer 364: public awareness and acceptance of CO2 capture and storage. Research report. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_364_en.pdf.
14. Ferreira S., Gallagher L. Protest responses and community attitudes toward accepting compensation to host waste disposal infrastructure. Land Use Policy 2010, 27:638-652.
15. Field P., Raiffa H., Susskind L. Risk and justice: rethinking the concept of compensation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1996, 545:156-164.
16. Fischhoff B., Slovic P., Lichtenstein S., Read S., Combs B. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences 1978, 9:127-152.
17. Frey B.S., Oberholzer-Gee F. The cost of price incentives: an empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. American Economic Review 1997, 87:746-755.
18. Frey B.S., Oberholzer-Gee F., Eichenberger R. The old lady visits your backyard: a tale of morals and markets. Journal of Political Economy 1996, 104:1297-1313.
19. Gerrard M.B. Whose Backyard, Whose Risk: Fear and Fairness in Toxic and Nuclear Waste Siting 1994, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
20. Gregory R., Kunreuther H., Easterling D., Richards K. Incentives policies to site hazardous waste facilities. Risk Analysis 1991, 11:667-675.
21. Groothuis P.A., Groothuis J.D., Whitehead J.C. Green vs. green: measuring the compensation required to site electrical generation windmills in a viewshed. Energy Policy 2008, 36:1545-1550.
22. 2 capture, transport and storage pilot project. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:6263-6272.
23. Hammond, J., Shackley, S., 2010. Towards a public communication and engagement strategy for carbon dioxide capture and storage projects in Scotland: a review of research findings, CCS project experiences, tools, resources and best practices. Working paper: SCCS 2010-08.
24. Himmelberger J.J., Ratick S.J., White A.L. Compensation for risks: host community benefits in siting locally unwanted facilities. Environmental Management 1991, 15:647-658.
25. Hund G., Greenberg S.E. Dual-track CCS stakeholder engagement: lessons learned from FutureGen in Illinois. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:6218-6225.
26. Jenkins-Smith H., Kunreuther H. Mitigation and benefits measures as policy tools for siting potentially hazardous facilities: determinants of effectiveness and appropriateness. Risk Analysis 2001, 21:371-382.
27. Krupnick A.J., Cropper M.L. The effect of information on health risk valuations. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1992, 5:29-48.
28. 2 storage in Barendrecht. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:6226-6233.
29. Kunreuther H., Easterling D. The role of compensation in siting hazardous facilities. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1996, 15:601-622.
30. Kunreuther H., Easterling D., Desvousges W., Slovic P. Public attitudes toward siting a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. Risk Analysis 1990, 10:469-484.
31. Kunreuther H., Fitzgerald K., Aarts T.D. Siting noxious facilities: a test of the facility siting credo. Risk Analysis 1993, 13:301-318.
32. Kunreuther, H., Susskind, L., Aarts, T.D., 1991. The facility siting credo: guidelines for an effective facility siting process. http://web.mit.edu/publicdisputes/practice/credo.html.
33. Lindell M.K., Earle T.C. How close is close enough: public perceptions of the risks of industrial facilities. Risk Analysis 1983, 3:245-253.
34. Mansfield C., Van Houtven G.L., Huber J. Compensating for public harms: why public goods are preferred to money. Land Economics 2002, 78:368-389.
35. Markusson N., Ishii A., Stephens J.C. The social and political complexities of learning in carbon capture and storage demonstration projects. Global Environmental Change 2011, 21:293-302.
36. O'Hare M., Bacow L., Sanderson D. Facility Siting and Public Opposition 1983, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
37. Oltra C., Sala R., Sola R., Di Masco M., Rowe G. Lay perceptions of carbon capture and storage technology. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:698-706.
38. Palmgren C.R., Morgan M.G., Bruine de Bruin W., Keith D.W. Initial public perceptions of deep geological and oceanic disposal of carbon dioxide. Environmental Science and Technology 2004, 38:6441-6450.
39. Portney K.E. The potential of the theory of compensation for mitigating public opposition to hazardous-waste treatment facility siting: some evidence from 5 Massachusetts communities. Policy Studies Journal 1985, 14:81-89.
40. Portney K.E. Siting Hazardous Waste Facilities: The NIMBY Syndrome 1991, Auburn House, New York.
41. Rogers G.O. Siting potentially hazardous facilities: what factors impact perceived and acceptable risk?. Landscape and Urban Planning 1998, 39:265-281.
42. Schively C. Understanding the NIMBY and LULU phenomena: reassessing our knowledge base and informing future research. Journal of Planning Literature 2007, 21:255-266.
43. Shackley S., Mander S., Reiche A. Public perceptions of underground coal gasification in the United Kingdom. Energy Policy 2006, 34:3423-3433.
44. 2 capture and storage (CCS) in Europe: an assessment of the key determining factors: Part 2. The social acceptability of CCS and the wider impacts and repercussions of its implementation. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2009, 3:344-356.
45. 2 storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2009, 3:641-651.
46. Singleton G., Herzog H., Ansolabehere S. Public risk perspectives on the geologic storage of carbon dioxide. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2009, 3:100-107.
47. Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science 1987, 236:280-285.
48. Sorensen J.H., Soderstrom J., Carnes S.A. Sweet for the sour: incentives in environmental mediation. Environmental Management 1984, 8:287-294.
49. Terwel B.W., Daamen D.D.L. Initial public reactions to carbon capture and storage (CCS): differentiating general and local views. Climate Policy 2012, 12:288-300.
50. 2 capture and storage (CCS) technology: how trust in stakeholders affects public acceptance of CCS. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5:181-188.
51. Terwel B.W., Ter Mors E., Daamen D.D.L. It's not only about safety: beliefs and attitudes of 811 local residents regarding a CCS project in Barendrecht. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 9:41-51.
52. 2 geological storage for global warming mitigation in Japan. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2007, 12:1237-1251.
53. Tokushige K., Akimoto K., Tomoda T. Public perceptions on the acceptance of geological storage of carbon dioxide and information influencing the acceptance. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1:101-112.
54. Trabucchi C., Donlan M., Wade S. A multi-disciplinary framework to monetize financial consequences arising from CCS projects and motivate effective financial responsibility. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:388-395.
55. Upham P., Roberts T. Public perceptions of CCS: emergent themes in pan-European focus groups and implications for communications. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5:1359-1367.
56. Van Alphen K., Van Voorst tot Voorst Q., Hekkert M.P., Smits R.E.H.M. Societal acceptance of carbon capture and storage technologies. Energy Policy 2007, 35:4368-4380.
57. Viscusi W.K., Magat W.A., Huber J. Pricing environmental health risks: survey assessments of risk-risk and risk-dollar trade-offs for chronic bronchitis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1991, 21:32-51.
58. Vlek C., Stallen P.J. Judging risks and benefits in the small and in the large. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1981, 28:235-271.
59. Wade S., Greenberg S. Afraid to start because the outcome is uncertain? Social site characterization as a tool for informing public engagement efforts. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:4641-4647.
60. Wolsink M., Devilee J. The motives for accepting or rejecting waste infrastructure facilities. Shifting the focus from the planners' perspective to fairness and community commitment. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2009, 52:217-236.