It's not only about safety: Beliefs and attitudes of 811 local residents regarding a CCS project in Barendrecht

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 9, Issue , 2012, Pages 41-51

  Terwel, Bart W ^a   ter Mors, Emma ^a   Daamen, Dancker D L ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Carbon capture and storage (CCS); Local opposition; Public perception; Survey; Trust

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SURVEYING; SURVEYS;

ATTITUDES; CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGES (CCS); LOCAL OPPOSITION; PUBLIC PERCEPTION; TRUST;

CARBON CAPTURE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; DECISION MAKING; PERCEPTION; SAFETY; SURVEY;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 84860617814     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.02.017     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ashworth P., Boughen N., Mayhew M., Millar F. From research to action: Now we have to move on CCS communication. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:426-433.
2. Bradbury, J., Ray, I., Peterson, T., Wade, S., Wong-Parodi, G., Feldpausch, A., 2009. The role of social factors in shaping public perceptions of CCS: Results of multi-state focus group interviews in the U.S. Energy Procedia 1, 4665-4672.
3. Brunsting S., De Best-Waldhober M., Feenstra C.F.J., Mikunda T. Stakeholder participation practices and onshore CCS: Lessons from the Dutch CCS Case Barendrecht. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:6376-6383.
4. Brunsting, S., Mikunda, T., 2010. Public participation practices and onshore CCS: Lessons from a Dutch CCS Case. In: Desbarats, J., Upham, P., Riesch, H., Reiner, D., Brunsting, S., et al. (Eds.), Review of the public participation practices for CCS and non-CCS projects in Europe (Appendix G). Institute for European Environmental Policy. Retrieved from http://www.communicationnearco2.eu/fileadmin/communicationnearco2/user/docs/WP1.2_Final_report.pdf.
5. 2 capture and storage technologies in the Netherlands. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2009, 3:322-332.
6. Devine-Wright P. Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy 2005, 8:125-139.
7. Devine-Wright, P., 2009. Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 19, 426-441.
8. De Vries G., Jehn K.A., Terwel B.W. When employees stop talking and start fighting: The detrimental effects of pseudo voice in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 2012, 105:221-230.
9. Dütschke E. What drives local public acceptance-comparing two cases from Germany. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:6234-6240.
10. Eiser R.J., Miles S., Frewer L.J. Trust, perceived risk and attitudes toward food technologies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2002, 32:2423-2433.
11. European Commission, 2011. Special Eurobarometer 364: Public awareness and acceptance of CO2 capture and storage. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb_special_379_360_en.htm.
12. Feenstra C.F.J., Mikunda T., Brunsting S. What Happened in Barendrecht? Case Study on the Planned Onshore Carbon Dioxide Storage in Barendrecht, the Netherlands 2010, ECN, Amsterdam.
13. Hadaway C.K., Marler P.L., Chaves M. Overreporting church attendance in America: Evidence that demands the same verdict. American Sociological Review 1998, 63:122-130.
14. Hammond, J., Shackley, S., 2010. Towards a public communication and engagement strategy for carbon dioxide capture and storage projects in Scotland: A Review of research findings, CCS project experiences, tools, resources and best practices. Working paper: SCCS 2010-08.
15. Kunreuther H., Fitzgerald K., Aarts T.D. Siting noxious facilities: a test of the facility siting credo. Risk Analysis 1993, 13:301-318.
16. Malone E.L., Dooley J.J., Bradbury J.A. Moving from misinformation derived from public attitude surveys on carbon dioxide capture and storage towards realistic stakeholder involvement. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:419-425.
17. Minister of Economic Affairs, Agriculture, and Innovation, 2010. Uitwerking van de afspraken voor de individuele CO2 opslagprojecten die momenteel in voorbereiding zijn [Elaboration of agreements concerning the individual CO2 storage projects that are currently in preparation]. Retrieved from http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-en-publicaties/kamerstukken/2010/11/04/uitwerking-van-de-afspraken-voor-de-individuele-co2-opslagprojecten-die-momenteel-in-voorbereiding-zijn.html.
18. Nisbett R., Ross L. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment 1980, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
19. Pietzner K., Schumann D., Tvedt S.D., Torvatn H., Næss R., et al. Public awareness and perceptions of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS): Insights from surveys administered to representative samples in six European countries. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:6300-6306.
20. Poortinga W., Pidgeon N.F. Trust in risk regulation: cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food?. Risk Analysis 2005, 25:197-207.
21. Prior M. The immensely inflated news audience: assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly 2009, 73:130-143.
22. Siegrist M. The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis 2000, 20:195-204.
23. Siegrist M., Cvetkovich G. Perception of hazards: the role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis 2000, 20:713-719.
24. Ter Mors E., Weenig M.W.H., Ellemers N., Daamen D.D.L. Effective communication about complex environmental issues: perceived quality of information about carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) depends on stakeholder collaboration. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2010, 30:347-357.
25. Terwel B.W., Daamen D.D.L. Initial public reactions to carbon capture and storage (CCS): differentiating general and local views. Climate Policy 2012, 12:288-300.
26. Terwel B.W., Harinck F., Ellemers N., Daamen D.D.L. Competence-based and integrity-based trust as predictors of acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS). Risk Analysis 2009, 29:1129-1140.
27. Terwel B.W., Harinck F., Ellemers N., Daamen D.D.L. How organizational motives and communications affect public trust in organizations: The case of carbon dioxide capture and storage. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2009, 29:290-299.
28. Terwel, B.W., Harinck, F., Ellemers, N., Daamen, D.D.L., 2010. Voice in political decision-making: The effect of group voice on perceived trustworthiness of decision makers and subsequent acceptance of decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 16, 173-186.
29. 2 capture and storage (CCS) technology: How trust in stakeholders affects public acceptance of CCS. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5:181-188.
30. Tichenor P.J., Donohue G.A., Olien C.N. Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly 1970, 34:159-170.
31. Wolsink M. Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: Institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support. Renewable Energy 2000, 21:49-64.
32. Wolsink M. Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of 'backyard motives'. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review 2007, 11:1188-1207.