Afraid to Start Because the Outcome is Uncertain?: Social Site Characterization as a Tool for Informing Public Engagement Efforts

Energy Procedia

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 4641-4647

  Wade, Sarah ^a   Greenberg, Sallie ^b  

^a AJW Inc   (United States)

^b ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

CCS; FutureGen; outreach; public percetion; Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships

Indexed keywords

CCS; FUTUREGEN; OUTREACH; PUBLIC PERCETION; REGIONAL CARBON SEQUESTRATION PARTNERSHIPS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS;

SITE SELECTION;

EID: 67650154662     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18766102     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.286     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. D.M. Reiner, 2008. A Looming Rhetorical Gap: A Survey Of Public Communications Activities For Carbon Dioxide Capture And Storage Technologies. Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, UK
2. FutureGen Alliance. 2007. Final Site Selection Report. Washington, DC
3. Interview with Illinois officials involved in developing that State's FutureGen proposal
4. Cite DOE website with presentations from 2008 Annual Review when the site is posted
5. P.S. Adler, J.L. Kranowitz, 2005. A Primer on Perceptions of Risk, Risk Communication and Building Trust. The Keystone Center, Keystone, CO
6. U.S.EPA. 2008. Federal Requirements Under the UIC Program for CO2 Geologic Sequestration Wells. Federal Register 43492-43541. Washington, DC
7. J.A. Bradbury, K.M. Branch, E.L. Malone, 2003. An Evaluation of DOE-EM Public Participation Programs. PNNL-14200, Battelle
8. G.R. Singleton, 2007. Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide: Risk Analyses and Implications for Public Acceptance. M.I.T. Masters Thesis, Cambridge, MA
9. NETL. 2008. Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Weblinks: http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/partnerships/partnerships.html