On the Contribution of Binocular Disparity to the Long-Term Memory for Natural Scenes

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2012, Pages

  Valsecchi, Matteo ^a   Gegenfurtner, Karl R ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; BUILDING; CAR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FOREST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MEMORY, LONG-TERM; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISION DISPARITY; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84869232201     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049947     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Standing L, (1973) Learning 10,000 Pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 25: 207-222.
2. Shepard RN (1967) Recognition Memory for Words Sentences and Pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6: 156-&.
3. Potter MC, (1976) Short-Term Conceptual Memory for Pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Learning and Memory 2: 509-522.
4. Intraub H, (1980) Presentation Rate and the Representation of Briefly Glimpsed Pictures in Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Learning and Memory 6: 1-12.
5. Potter MC, Staub A, O'Connor DH, (2004) Pictorial and conceptual representation of glimpsed pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 30: 478-489.
6. Hollingworth A, (2004) Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: The roles of short- and long-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 30: 519-537.
7. Franken RE, Rowland GL, (1979) Nature of the Representation for Picture-Recognition Memory. Perceptual and Motor Skills 49: 619-629.
8. Brady TF, Konkle T, Alvarez GA, Oliva A, (2008) Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 14325-14329.
9. Huebner GM, Gegenfurtner KR (2012) Conceptual and Visual Features Contribute to Visual Memory for Natural Images. Plos One 7.
10. Wichmann FA, Sharpe LT, Gegenfurtner KR, (2002) The contributions of color to recognition memory for natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition 28: 509-520.
11. Spence I, Wong P, Rusan M, Rastegar N, (2006) How color enhances visual memory for natural scenes. Psychological Science 17: 1-6.
12. Yao AYJ, Einhäuser W (2008) Color aids late but not early stages of rapid natural scene recognition. Journal of Vision 8.
13. Nijboer TCW, Kanai R, de Haan EHF, van der Smagt MJ, (2008) Recognising the forest, but not the trees: An effect of colour on scene perception and recognition. Consciousness and Cognition 17: 741-752.
14. Goldstein AG, Chance JE, Hoisington M, Buescher K, (1982) Recognition Memory for Pictures- Dynamic Vs Static Stimuli. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 20: 37-40.
15. Matthews WJ, Buratto LG, Lamberts K, (2010) Exploring the memory advantage for moving scenes. Visual Cognition 18: 1393-1419.
16. Christou CG, Bülthoff HH, (1999) View dependence in scene recognition after active learning. Memory & Cognition 27: 996-1007.
17. Gaunet F, Vidal M, Kemeny A, Berthoz A, (2001) Active, passive and snapshot exploration in a virtual environment: influence on scene memory, reorientation and path memory. Cognitive Brain Research 11: 409-420.
18. Lee YL, Saunders JA (2011) Stereo improves 3D shape discrimination even when rich monocular shape cues are available. Journal of Vision 11.
19. Burke D, (2005) Combining disparate views of objects: Viewpoint costs are reduced by stereopsis. Visual Cognition 12: 705-719.
20. Bennett DJ, Vuong QC, (2006) A stereo advantage in generalizing over changes in viewpoint on object recognition tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 68: 1082-1093.
21. Edelman S, Bülthoff HH, (1992) Orientation Dependence in the Recognition of Familiar and Novel Views of 3-Dimensional Objects. Vision Research 32: 2385-2400.
22. Burke D, Taubert J, Higman T, (2007) Are face representations viewpoint dependent? A stereo advantage for generalising across different views of faces. Vision Research 47: 2164-2169.
23. Nakatani C, Pollatsek A, Johnson SH, (2002) Viewpoint-dependent recognition of scenes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a-Human Experimental Psychology 55: 115-139.
24. Waller D, (2006) Egocentric and nonegocentric coding in memory for spatial layout: Evidence from scene recognition. Memory & Cognition 34: 491-504.
25. Castelhano MS, Pollatsek A, Rayner K, (2009) Integration of multiple views of scenes. Attention Perception & Psychophysics 71: 490-502.
26. Finlay C, Motes M, Kozhevnikov M, (2007) Updating representations of learned scenes. Psychological Research 71: 265-276.
27. Mou WM, Zhang H, McNamara TP, (2009) Novel-view scene recognition relies on identifying spatial reference directions. Cognition 111: 175-186.
28. Motes MA, Finlay CA, Kozhevnikov M, (2006) Scene recognition following locomotion around a scene. Perception 35: 1507-1520.
29. Bruce V, Green PR, Georgeson MA (2003) Visual perception: Physiology, psychology, and ecology. New York: Psychology Press.
30. Brainard DH, (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10: 433-436.
31. Franken RE, Rowland GL, (1978) Organizational-Factors in Picture Recognition Memory. Acta Psychologica 42: 441-452.
32. Greene MR, Oliva A, (2009) Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing the forest without representing the trees. Cognitive Psychology 58: 137-176.
33. Loftus GR, Nelson WW, Kallman HJ, (1983) Differential Acquisition Rates for Different Types of Information from Pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a-Human Experimental Psychology 35: 187-198.
34. Hansen T, Gegenfurtner KF, (2009) Independence of color and luminance edges in natural scenes. Visual Neuroscience 26: 35-49.