Updating representations of learned scenes

Psychological Research

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 265-276

  Finlay, Cory A ^a   Motes, Michael A ^a   Kozhevnikov, Maria ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEMORY; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; REVIEW; VISION;

COGNITION; HUMANS; LEARNING; MEMORY; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33947634436     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-006-0082-2     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Avraamides, M. N. (2003). Spatial updating of environments described in texts. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 402-431.
2. Christou, C. G., & Buelthoff, H. H. (1999). View dependence in scene recognition after active learning. Memory & Cognition, 27, 996-1007.
3. Diwadkar, V. A., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 302-307.
4. Farrell, M. J., & Robertson, I. H. (1998). Mental rotation and automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 227-233.
5. Farrell, M. J., & Thomson, J. A. (1998). Autonomic spatial updating during locomotion without vision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 51A, 637-654.
6. Luck, S., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.
7. Motes, M. A., Finlay, C. A., & Kozhevnikov, M. (in press). Scene movement versus observer movement in scene recognition: A test of the spatial updating hypothesis. Perception.
8. Motes, M. A., Finlay, C. A., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2006). Effects of set-size on scene recognition following locomotion. Presented at the Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting.
9. Mou, W., & McNamara,T. P. (2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 162-170.
10. Mou, W., McNamara, T. P., Valiquette, C. M., & Rump, B. (2004). Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 142-157.
11. Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1157-1165.
12. Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2004). Orientation and perspective dependence in route and survey learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 158-170.
13. Simons, D. J., & Wang, R. F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science, 9, 315-320.
14. Waller, D., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., & Hegarty, M. (2002). Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 1051-1063.
15. Wang, R. F., & Simons, D. J. (1999). Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 70, 191-210.
16. Wang, R. F., & Spelke, E. S. (2000). Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition, 77, 215-250.