Viewpoint-dependent recognition of scenes

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 115-139

  Nakatani, Chie ^a,c   Pollatsek, Alexander ^a   Johnson, Scott H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^c RIKEN BRAIN SCIENCE INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; RANDOMIZATION; RECOGNITION;

FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0036371997     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980143000190     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bethell-Fox, C.E., & Shepard, R.N. (1988). Mental rotation: Effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 12-23.
2. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-187.
3. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P.C. (1993). Recognizing depth rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
4. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P.C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1506-1514.
5. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
6. Diwadkar, V.A., & McNamara, T.P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 302-307.
7. Edelman, S., & Bülthoff, H.H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three dimensional objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
8. Folk, M.D., & Luce, R.D. (1987). Effects of stimulus complexity on mental rotation of polygons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 395-404.
9. Hayward, W.G., & Tarr, M.J. (1997). Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1511-1521.
10. Johnson, S.H. (1991). Commentary on Tarr and Pinker (1990). Psychological Science, 2, 205-206.
11. Johnson, S.H. (1993). Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, Cornell University, USA.
12. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory and Cognition, 13, 289-303.
13. Logothetis, N., Pauls, J., & Poggio, T. (1995). Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Current Biology, 5, 552-563.
14. Metzler, J., & Shepard, R.N. (1974). Transformational studies of the internal representation of three-dimensional objects. In R.L. Solso (Ed.), Theories of cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Parsons, L.M. (1987). Visual discrimination of abstract mirror reflected three-dimensional objects at many orientations. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 49-59.
16. Perrett, D.I., Oram, M.W., & Ashbridge, E. (1998). Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: An account of generalization of recognition without transformations. Cognition, 67, 111-145.
17. Plaut, D.C., & Farah, M.J. (1990). Visual object representation: Interpreting neurophysiological data within a computational framework. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 320-343.
18. Poggio, T., & Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263-266.
19. Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1019-1025.
20. Rock, I. (1973). Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.
21. Rock, I., DiVita, J., & Barbetito, R. (1981). The effect on form perception of change of orientation in the third dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 719-732.
22. Shepard, R.N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three dimensional objects. Science, 191, 952-954.
23. Tarr, M.J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 55-82.
24. Tarr, M.J., & Bülthoff, H.H. (1995). Conditions for viewpoint dependence and viewpoint invariance. What mechanisms are used to recognize an object? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1496-1507.
25. Tarr, M.J., & Bülthoff, H.H. (1998). Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine. Cognition, 67, 1-20.
26. Tarr, M.J., & Gauthier, I. (1998). Do viewpoint dependent mechanisms generalize across members of class? Cognition, 67, 73-110.
27. Tarr, M.J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-283.
28. Tarr, M.J., & Pinker, S. (1990). When does human object recognition use a viewer-centered reference frame? Psychological Science, 1, 253-256.