Exploring sociality and engagement in play through game-control distribution

AI and Society

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 193-201

  Rozendaal, Marco C ^a   Braat, Bram A L ^a   Wensveen, Stephan A G ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Engagement; Games; Interaction design; Interdependence; Play; Sociality

Indexed keywords

ENGAGEMENT; GAMES; INTERACTION DESIGN; INTERDEPENDENCE; PLAY; SOCIALITY;

SOCIAL ASPECTS; SURVEYS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84869057864     PISSN: 09515666     EISSN: 14355655     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00146-009-0245-y     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ajzen I (2002) Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 32(4): 665-683.
2. Averill JR (1973) Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. Psychol Bull 80(4): 286-303.
3. Campbell DT (1958) Common fate, similarity and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behav Sci 3(1): 14-25.
4. Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and validity assessment. Sage, Newbury Park.
5. Chapman P, Selvarajah S, Webster J (1999) Engagement in multimedia training systems. HICSS-32 proceedings of the thirty-second annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, CD-ROM. IEEE, Maui.
6. Chen H, Wigand RT, Nilan MS (1999) Optimal experience of web activities. Comput Hum Behav 15(5): 585-608.
7. Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: the psychology of the optimal experience. HarperCollins, New York.
8. Fiske DW, Maddi SR (1961) A conceptual framework. In: Fiske DW, Maddi SR (eds) Functions of varied experience. The Dorsey press, Homewood, pp 11-56.
9. Fruchter R (2005) Degrees of engagement in interactive workspaces. AI & Society 19(1): 8-21.
10. Garris R, Ahlers R, Driskell JE (2002) Games, motivation, and learning: a research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming 33(4): 441-467.
11. Gaver W (1996) Affordances for interaction: the social is the material for design. Ecol Psychol 8(2): 111-129.
12. Gibson JJ (1977) The theory of affordances. In: Shaw R, Bransford J (eds) Perceiving, acting, and knowing: toward an ecological psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 67-82.
13. Hallnäs L, Redström J (2002) From use to presence: on the expressions and aesthetics of everyday computational things. ACM Trans Comput-Human Interact 9(2): 106-124.
14. Hancock PA, Pepe AA, Murphy LL (2005) Hedonomics: the power of positive and pleasurable ergonomics. Ergonomics in design: The quarterly of human factors applications 13(1): 8-14.
15. Hassenzahl M (2004) The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Comput Interact 19(4): 319-349.
16. Hodges BH, Baron RM (2007) On making social psychology more ecological and ecological psychology more social. Ecol Psychol 19(2): 79-84.
17. Hornbæk K (2006) Current practice in measuring usability: challenges to usability studies and research. Int J Human-Comput Stud 64(2): 79-102.
18. Hummels CCM, van der Helm A (2004) ISH and the search for resonant tangible interaction. Pers Ubiquit Comput 8(5): 385-388.
19. Jacques R, Preece J, Carey T (1995) Engagement as a design concept for multimedia. Canad J Educ Commun 24(1): 49-59.
20. Johnson DW, Johnson RT (2005) New Developments in social interdependence theory. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr 131(4): 285-358.
21. Kreijns K, Kirschner PA, Jochems W, van Buuren H (2007) Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Comput Educ 49(2): 176-192.
22. Laurel B (1991) Computers as theatre. Addison-Wesley, Reading.
23. Lindley CA (2004) Ludic engagement and immersion as a generic paradigm for human-computer interaction design. In: Proc. ICEC2004. Springer, pp 3-13.
24. Luckin R, du Boulay B (1999) Ecolab: the development and evaluation of a Vygotskian design framework. Int J Artif Intell Educ 10: 198-220.
25. Ludvigsen M (2006) Designing for social interaction-co-located, physical social computing. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Design, Aarhus School of Architecture.
26. Malone TW (1981) Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognit Sci 4: 333-369.
27. Manninen T (2002) Contextual virtual interaction as part of ubiquitous game design and development. Pers Ubiquit Comput 6(6): 390-406.
28. Nishida T (2007) Social intelligence design and human computing. Artificial intelligence for human computing. LNAI 4451: 190-214.
29. Norman DA (2004) Emotional design: why we love or hate everyday things. Basic Books, New York.
30. Novak TP, Hoffman DL, Yung YF (2000) Measuring the customer experience in on-line environments: a structural modeling approach. Mark Sci 19(1): 22-42.
31. Overbeeke CJ, Djajadiningrat JP, Hummels CCM, Wensveen SAG (2002) Beauty in usability: forget about ease of use!. In: Green WS, Jordan PW (eds) Pleasure with products: beyond usability. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 9-18.
32. Quesenbury W (2002) The five dimensions of usability. In: Albers M, Mazur B (eds) Content and complexity: information design in technical communication. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 81-102.
33. Reeves B, Malone TW, O'Driscoll T (2008) Leadership's online labs. Harv Bus Rev 5: 58-66.
34. Rozendaal MC, Keyson DV, de Ridder H (2007a) Interactivity, vividness and richness in user interfaces. In: International workshop on social intelligence design (SID07). Trento, Italy, pp 269-278.
35. Rozendaal MC, Keyson DV, de Ridder H (2007b) Product behavior and appearance effects on experienced engagement during experiential and goal-directed tasks. In: International conference on designing pleasurable products and interfaces (DPPI07). Helsinki, Finland, pp 181-194.
36. Rozendaal MC, Keyson DV, de Ridder H, Craig PO (2009a) Game feature and expertise effects on experienced richness, control and engagement in game play. AI Soc 24(2): 123-133.
37. Rozendaal MC, Keyson DV, de Ridder H (2009b) Product features and task effects on experienced richness, control and engagement in voicemail browsing. Pers Ubiquit Comput 13(5): 343-354.
38. Sanders D, Welk DS (2005) Strategies to scaffold student learning: applying Vygotsky's zone of proximal development. Nurse Educator 30(5): 203-207.
39. Spencer-Rodgers J, Hamilton DL, Sherman SJ (2007) The central role of entitativity in stereotypes of social categories and task groups. J Pers Soc Psychol 92(3): 369-388.
40. Stangor C (2004) Social groups in action and interaction. Psychology Press, New York.
41. Steuer J (1992) Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J Commun 42(2): 73-93.
42. Volet S, Wosnitza M (2004) Social affordances and students' engagement in cross-national online learning: an exploratory study. J Res Int Educ 3(1): 5-30.
43. Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind and society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
44. Webster J, Ho H (1997) Audience engagement in multimedia presentations. DATA BASE Adv Inf Syst 28(2): 63-77.
45. Wensveen SAG (2005) A Tangibility approach to affective interaction. Doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
46. Wensveen SAG, Overbeeke CJ, Djajadiningrat JP (2004) Freedom of fun, freedom of interaction. Interactions 11(5): 59-60.