The Predictive Validity of a General Risk/Needs Assessment Inventory on Sexual Offender Recidivism and an Exploration of the Professional Override

Criminal Justice and Behavior

Volumn 39, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1511-1538

  Wormith, J Stephen ^a   Hogg, Sarah ^b   Guzzo, Lina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^b Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services   (Canada)

Author keywords

LS CMI; override; recidivism prediction; risk assessment; sexual offenders; structured professional judgment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868697023     PISSN: 00938548     EISSN: 15523594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093854812455741     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Abbott B. R.Throwing the baby out with the bath water: Is it time for clinical judgment to supplement actuarial risk assessment?.Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law. 2011;39:222-230.
2. Andrews D. A.,Bonta J.LSI-R: The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems; 1995:.
3. Andrews D. A.,Bonta J.The Level of Service Inventory-Revised: Screening Version. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems; 1998:.
4. Andrews D. A.,Bonta J.The psychology of criminal conduct. 2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis Matthew Bender.New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis Matthew Bender; 2010:.
5. Andrews D. A.,Bonta J.,Hoge R. G.Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 1990;17:19-52.
6. Andrews D. A.,Bonta J.,Wormith J. S.The Level of Service Inventory: Ontario Revision. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services; 1995:.
7. Andrews D. A.,Bonta J.,Wormith J. S.The Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems; 2004:.
8. Andrews D. A.,Bonta J.,Wormith J. S.The recent past and near future of risk/need assessment.Crime & Delinquency. 2006;52:7-27.
9. Andrews D. A.,Guzzo L.,Raynor P.,Rowe R. C.,Rettinger L. J.,Brews A.,Wormith J. S.Are the major risk/need factors predictive of both female and male reoffending? A test with the eight domains of the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. I.nternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2012;56:113-133.
10. Barbaree H. E.,Langton C.,Peacock E. J.Different actuarial risk measures produce different risk rankings for sexual offenders.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2006;18:423-440.
11. Blanchette K.,Brown S. L.The assessment and treatment of women offenders. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2006:.
12. Boer D. P.,Hart S. D.,Kropp P. R.,Webster C. D.Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk-20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute; 1997:.
13. BontaJ.YessineA. K. (2005). The National Flagging System: Identifying and responding to high-risk, violent offenders (User Report 2005-03). Ottawa: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada. Retrieved from https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/res/cor/rep/2005-04-flg-sysm-eng.aspx.
14. British Columbia Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General. (2004). Assessing the risk of reoffending. Retrieved from: http://www.probation.ie/pws/websitepublishing.nsf/attachmentsbytitle/Assessing+Risk+of+Re-offending/$file/Assessing+Risk+of+Re-offending.pdf.
15. Caldwell M. F.,Dickinson C.Sex offender registration and recidivism risk in juvenile sexual offenders.Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 2009;27:941-956.
16. Campbell T. W.Sex offenders and actuarial risk assessments: Ethical considerations.Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 2003;21:269-279.
17. CampbellT. W.DeClueG. (2010). Flying blind with naked factors: Problems and pitfalls in adjusted-actuarial sex-offender risk assessment. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 75-191. Retrieved from http://www.forensicpsychologyunbound.ws/OAJFP/Volume_2_2010_files/Campbell%202010.pdf.
18. Cohen J.Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988:.
19. Craig L. A.,Browne K. D.,Stringer I.Comparing sex offender risk assessment measures on a UK sample.International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2004;48:7-27.
20. Cronbach L. J.Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika. 1951;16:297-334.
21. DempsterR. J. (1998). Prediction of sexually violent recidivism: A comparison of risk assessment instruments (Unpublished master's thesis). Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
22. Doren D. M.Evaluating sex offenders: A manual for civil commitments and beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002:.
23. Douglas K. S.,Cox D. N.,Webster C. D.Violence risk assessment: Science and practice.Legal and Criminological Psychology. 1999;4:149-184.
24. Eher R.,Retternberger M.,Matthes A.,Schilling F.Stable dynamic risk factors in child sexual abusers: The incremental predictive power of narcissistic personality traits beyond the STATIC-99/STABLE-2007 priority categories on sexual reoffense.Sexual Offender Treatment. 2010;5:1-12.
25. Epperson D. L.,Kaul J. D.,Huot S. J. Poster session presented at the 14th Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers; 1995New Orleans, LA; 1995.
26. Garb H. N.Race bias, social class bias, and gender bias in clinical judgment.Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 1997;4:99-120.
27. Gentry A. L.,Dulmus C. N.,Theriot M. T.Comparing sex offender risk classification using the STATIC-99 and LSI-R assessment instruments.Research on Social Work Practice. 2005;15:557-563.
28. Girard L.,Wormith J.The predictive validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Ontario Revision on general and violent recidivism among various offender groups.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2004;31:150-181.
29. Gretton H. M.,McBride M.,Hare R. D.,O'Shaughnessy R.,Kumka G.Psychopathy and recidivism in adolescent sex offenders.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2001;28:427-449.
30. Hanley J. A.,McNeil B. J.The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology. 1982;143:29-36.
31. Hanley J. A.,McNeil B. J.A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.Radiology. 1983;148:839-843.
32. HansonR. (1997). The Development of a Brief Actuarial risk Scale for Sexual Offense Recidivism. Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada. Retrieved from http://www.defenseforsvp.com/Resources/Hanson_Static-99/RRASOR.pdf.
33. Hanson R. K.What do we know about sex offender risk assessment?.Psychology, Public Policy and Law. 1998;4:50-72.
34. Hanson R. K.The psychological assessment of risk for crime and violence.Canadian Psychology. 2009;50:172-180.
35. Hanson R. K.,Bussière M. T.Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1998;66:348-362.
36. HansonR. K.HarrisA. (2000a). The Sex Offender Need Assessment Rating (SONAR): A method for measuring change in risk levels. Ottawa: Corrections Research, Department of the Solicitor General of Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/res/cor/rep/sonar-eebds-eng.aspx.
37. Hanson R. K.,Harris A. J. R.Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sex offense recidivism.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2000b;27:6-35.
38. HansonR. K.HarrisJ. R.ScottT.-L.HelmusL. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The dynamic supervision project (User Report No. 2007-05). Ottawa: Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2007/ps-sp/PS3-1-2007-5E.pdf.
39. Hanson R. K.,Morton-Bourgon K. E.The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2005;73:1154-1163.
40. Hanson R. K.,Morton-Bourgon K. E.The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.Psychological Assessment. 2009;21:1-21.
41. HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (1999). STATIC-99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (User Report No. 1999-02). Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/res/cor/rep/_fl/1999-02-st99-imp-rsk-ssmnt-eng.pdf.
42. Hanson R. K.,Thornton D.Improving risk assessment for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales.Law and Human Behavior. 2000;24:119-136.
43. Hare R. D.The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems; 1991:.
44. HarrisA. J. R.HansonR. K. (2004). Sex offender recidivism: A simple question (Corrections Users Report No. 2004-03). Ottawa: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/res/cor/rep/2004-03-se-off-eng.aspx.
45. Harris G. T.,Rice M. E.,Quinsey V. L.,Lalumière M. L.,Boer D.,Lang C.A multi-site comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders.Psychological Assessment. 2003;15:413-425.
46. Hart S. D. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services; 2008Vienna, Austria; 2008.
47. Hart S. D.,Kropp P. R.,Laws D. R.,Klaver J.,Logan C.,Watt K. A.The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP). Burnaby, Canada: Simon Fraser University, Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute; 2003:.
48. Helmus L.,Hanson R. K.,Thornton D.Reporting STATIC-99 in light of new research on recidivism norms.The Forum. 2009;21:38-45.
49. Hoge R. D.,Andrews D. A.Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory: User's manual. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems; 2002:.
50. Ireland Probation & Welfare Services. (Undated). Assessing the risk of reoffending. Retrieved from: http://www.probation.ie/pws/websitepublishing.nsf/attachmentsbytitle/Assessing+Risk+of+Re-offending/$file/Assessing+Risk+of+Re-offending.pdf.
51. Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision. (2007). Sex offender assessment information survey (4-2007). Retrieved from http://www.interstatecompact.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=jLoQPVeviaQ%3D&tabid=105&mid=431.
52. Kropp P. R.,Hart S. D.Law and Human Behavior. Guide: Reliability and validity in adult male offenders; 2000:101-118.
53. KroppP. R.HartS. D. (2004). The development of the Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk (B-SAFER): A tool for criminal justice professionals. Ottawa: Research and Statistics Division, Justice Canada. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/pi/rs/rep-rap/2005/rr05_fv1-rr05_vf1/p5.html.
54. Kropp P. R.,Hart S. D.,Webster C. D.,Eaves D.Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA). Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems; 1999:.
55. LanaganP. A.SchmittE. L.DuroseM. R. (2003). Recidivism of sex offenders release from prison in 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/rsorp94.pdf.
56. Looman J.,Abracen J.Comparison of measures of recidivism in sexual offenders.Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2010;25:791-807.
57. Maletzky B.Treating the sexual offender. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1991:.
58. Morton K. E.Psychometric properties of four risk assessment measures with male adolescent sexual offenders.Dissertation Abstracts International. 2003 1833;41:.
59. Nuffield J.Parole decision making in Canada. Ottawa: Solicitor General of Canada; 1982:.
60. Olver M. E.,Wong S. C. P.,Nicholaichuk T. P.,Gordon A.The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change.Psychological Assessments. 2007;19:318-329.
61. Offences leading to incarceration. 1983;:.
62. Parent G.,Guay J. P.,Knight R. A.An assessment of long-term risk of recidivism by adult sex offenders: One size doesn't fit all.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2011;38:188-209.
63. Petrila J.,Otto R. K.The sexual predator: Legal issues, clinical issues, special populations. Schlank A., ed. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute; 2001:.
64. Prentky R. A.,Lee A. F. S.,Knight R. A.,Cerce D.Recidivism rates among child molesters and rapists: A methodological analysis.Law and Human Behavior. 1997;21:635-659.
65. Public Safety Canada. (2010). Corrections and conditional release statistical overview: Annual report-2010. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/res/cor/rep/2010-ccrso-eng.aspx.
66. Quinsey V.,Harris G.,Rice M.,Cormier C.Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1998:.
67. Quinsey V. L.,Harris G. T.,Rice M. E.,Cormier C. A.Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. 2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2006:.
68. QuirkD.NutbrownV.ReynoldsR. (1991). A practical measure of offence seriousness: Sentence severity. Brampton, Canada: Ontario Correctional Institute. Retrieved from http://regreynolds.ca/Articles/Criminality/Offence%20Severity.pdf.
69. Rice M. E.,Harris G. T.Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen's.d r. Law and Human Behavior. 2005;29:615-620.
70. Rosenthal R.The handbook of research synthesis. Cooper H. M.Hedges L. V., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994:.
71. Rossegger A.,Laubacher A.,Moskvitin K.,Villmar T.,Palermo G. B.,Endrass J.Risk assessment instruments in repeat offending: The usefulness of FOTRES.International Journal Offender Therapy Comparative Criminology. 2011;55:716-731.
72. Rowe R. C. Paper presented at the 51st annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology; 1999Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 1999.
73. Simourd D. J.,Malcolm B.Reliability and validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised among federally incarcerated sex offenders.Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 1998;13:261-274.
74. SkowronC. (2004, December). Differentiation and predictive factors in adolescent sexual offending (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
75. Sreenivasan S.,Weinberger L. E.,Frances A.,Cusworth-Walker S.Alice in actuarial-land: Through the looking glass of changing STATIC-99 norms.Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law. 2010;38:400-406.
76. Stasiuk E.,Winter K.,Nixon B.Awaiting trial: Accused persons remanded to custody. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services; 1996:.
77. Thornton D. Structured anchor clinical judgment risk assessment (SACJ): Proceedings of the NOTA Conference; 1997Brighton, United Kingdom; 1997.
78. Thornton D.,Mann R.,Webster S.,Blud L.,Travers R.,Friendship C.,Erikson M.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Vol. 989. Sexually coercive behavior: Understanding and management. Prentky R. A.Janus E. S.Seto M. C., ed. New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences; 2003:225-235.
79. Urbaniok F.FOTRES: Forensisches Operationalisiertes Therapie-Risiko-Evaluations-System. Bern, Switzerland: Zytglogge; 2007:.
80. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2001). Juveniles who have sexually offended: A review of the professional literature report. Retrieved from http://www.ojjdp.ncjrs.org/.
81. Van Voorhis P.,Wright E. M.,Salisbury E.,Bauman A.Women's risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of a gender-responsive supplement.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2010;37:261-288.
82. VranaG. C.SrogaM.GuzzoL. (2008). Predictive validity of the LSI-OR among a sample of adult male sexual assaulters. Unpublished manuscript, Nipissing University, North Bay, Canada.
83. Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (2005). Involuntary commitment of sexually violent predators: Comparing state laws. Olympia: Author. Retrieved from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/rptfiles/05-03-1101.pdf.
84. Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (2006). Sex offender sentencing in Washington State: Predicting recidivism based on the LSI-R. Olympia: Author. Retrieved from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/rptfiles/06-02-1201.pdf.
85. Webster C. D.,Douglas K. S.,Eaves D.,Hart S. D.HCR-20: Assessing the risk for violence. Vancouver, Canada: Simon Fraser University, Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute; 1997:.
86. Worling J. R.,Curwen T.Estimates of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR) Version 2.0. Toronto, Canada: SAFE-T Program, Thistletown Regional Centre; 2001:.
87. Wormith J. S.Research to practice: Applying risk/needs assessment to offender classification.Forum on Corrections Research. 1997;9:26-31.
88. Wormith J. S.The legacy of D. A. Andrews in the field of criminal justice: How theory and research can change policy and practice.International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 2011;10:78-82.
89. Wormith J. S.,Hogg S.,Guzzo L.The predictive validity of sexual offender recidivism with a general risk/needs assessment inventory. Saskatoon, Canada: University of Saskatchewan; 2011:.
90. Wormith J. S.,Olver M. E.,Stevenson H. E.,Girard L.The long-term prediction of offender recidivism using diagnostic, personality, and risk/need approaches to offender assessment.Psychological Services. 2007;4:287-305.
91. Yang M.,Wong S. C. P.,Coid J.The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools.Psychological Bulletin. 2010;136:740-767.