The legacy of D. A. Andrews in the field of criminal justice: How theory and research can change policy and practice

International Journal of Forensic Mental Health

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 78-82

  Wormith, J Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Effective correctional treatment; Offender risk assessment; Risk need responsivity (RNR)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84555218770     PISSN: 14999013     EISSN: 19329903     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14999013.2011.577138     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Andrews, D. A. (1969). Aversive treatment procedures in the modification of smoking. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Kingston Ontario: Queen’s University.
2. Andrews, D. A. (1980). Some experimental investigations of the principles of differential association through the deliberate manipulation of the structure of service systems. American Sociological Review, 45, 448–462.
3. Andrews, D. A. (2001). Principles of effective correctional programs. In L. L. Motiuk and R. C. Serin (Eds.), Compendium 2000 on effective correctional programming (pp. 9–17). Ottawa: Correctional Services of Canada.
4. Andrews, D. A. (2006). Enhancing adherence to risk-needs-responsivity: Making quality a matter of policy. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 595–602.
5. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1994). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
6. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). The level of service inventory-Revised. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
7. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct. (5th Ed.). New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis.
8. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19–52.
9. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2004). Level of Service/Case Management Inventor (LS/CMI): An offender assessment system: User’s manual. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
10. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7–27.
11. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (in press a). The Risk-Need- Responsivity (RNR)Model: Does adding the good lives model contribute to effective crime prevention? Criminal Justice and Behavior.
12. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., Wormith, J. S., Guzzo, L., Brews, A., Rettinger, J., & Rowe, R. (2011). Sources of variability in estimates of predictive validity: A specification with LS general risk/need. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 413–432.
13. Andrews, D. A., Guzzo, L., Raynor, P., Rowe, R., Rettinger, L. J., Brews, A., & Wormith, J. S. (in press b). Are the major risk/need factors predictive of both female and male reoffending? A test with the eight domains of the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. doi: 10.1177/0306624X10395716
14. Andrews, D. A., & Robinson, D. (1984). The Level of Supervision Inventory: Second report. Report to Research Services. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Correctional Services.
15. Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369–404.
16. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1959). Adolescent aggression. New York: Ronald.
17. Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. (2003). Gender responsive strategies: Research, practice and guiding principles for women offenders. Washington DC: NIC, US Department of Justice.
18. Bonta, J. (2010). Donald Arthur Andrews June 13, 1941 –October 22, 2010: An appreciation. Federal Probation, 74 (3). http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FederalCourts/PPS/Fedprob/2010-12/andrews.html
19. Bonta, J. (2011). Obituary: Donald Arthur Andrews, 13 June 1941 –22 October, 1010. Psychology Crime & Law, 17, 93–95.
20. Broten, L. (2010). Letter from the Minister of Child and Youth Services of Ontario, October 28, 2010.
21. Cullen, F. T. (2005). The twelve people who saved rehabilitation: How the science of criminology made a difference. Criminology, 43, 1–42.
22. Dolman, A. (2002). Carleton’s most wanted BA. Carleton University Magazine. Spring, 12–13.
23. Forth, A. (2011). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct: The Legacy of Don Andrews. Symposium presented at the Second International Conference of Correctional and Criminal Justice Psychology. Toronto, June.
24. Freud, S. (1953). A general introduction to psychoanalysis. New York: Permabooks.
25. Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D. A. (1979). Psychological consultation in correctional agencies: Case studies and general issues. In J. J. Platt & R. W. Wicks (Eds.), The psychological consultant (pp.127–212). New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
26. Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D. A. (1990). Tertiary prevention: what the metaanalyses of the offender treatment literature tell us about “what works.” Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32, 173–184.
27. Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D. A. (2001). Correctional Program Assessment Inventory –2000 (CPAI-2000). Scoring manual. St. John, NB: University of New Brunswick.
28. Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (1999). The forgotten issue in effective correctional treatment: Program implementation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 180–187.
29. Glaser, D. (1975). Achieving better questions: A half-century’s progress in correctional research. Federal Probation, 39, 3–9.
30. Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. T. (1950). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Hannah-Moffat, K. (2009). Gridlock or mutability: Reconsidering “gender” and risk assessment. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 209–219.
32. Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (2002). Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI). Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems.
33. Holtfreter, K., & Cupp, R. (2007).Gender and risk assessment: The empirical status of the LSI-R forwomen. Journal of ContemporaryCriminal Justice, 23, 363–382.
34. Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. (1998). The importance of evaluating correctional programs: Assessing outcome and quality. Corrections Management Quarterly, 2, 22–29.
35. Latessa, E. J., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2006). What works in reducing recidivism? University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 3, 521–535.
36. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science; selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper & Row.
37. Lipsey, M. W. (1999). Can rehabilitative program reduce the recidivism of juvenile offenders? An inquiry into the effectiveness of practical programs. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law, 6, 611–642.
38. Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A Review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 1–44.
39. Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. M. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13, 676 offenders and 97 correctional programs? Crime and Delinquency, 52, 77–93.
40. Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 575–594.
41. Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35, 22–54.
42. McGuire, J. (2002). Integrating findings from research reviews. In J. McGuire (Ed.), Offender rehabilitation and treatment: Effective programmes and policies to reduce reoffending (pp. 3–38). Chchester, UK: Wiley.
43. Morgan, R. D., Flora, D. B., Kroner, D. G., Mills, J. F., Varghese, F., & Steffan, J. S. (in press). Treating offenders with mental illness: A research synthesis. Law and Human Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10979-011-9271-7
44. Ottawa Citizen (2011). Obituary, Donald Arthur Andrews. October 26, 2010. Retrieved from http://www.legacy.com/can-ottawa/Obituaries.asp?page=lifestory&personid=146251548.
45. Skeem, J. L., Manchak, S., & Peterson, J. K. (in press). Correctional policy for offenders with mental disorder: Creating a new paradigm for recidivism reduction. Law & Human Behavior.
46. Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1970). Principles of criminology (6th Ed). New York: Lippincott.
47. Taylor K. N., & Blanchette, K. (2009) The women are not wrong: It is the approach that is debatable. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 221–229.
48. Toronto Globe & Mail. Obituary, Donald Arthur Andrews. October, 27, 2010. Retrieved from http://v1.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/Deaths.20101027.93247177/BDAStory/BDA/deaths.
49. Van Voorhis, P., Wright, E. M., Salisbury, E., & Bauman, A. (2010). Women’s risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of a gender-responsive supplement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 261–288.
50. Ward, T., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation: Beyond the risk paradigm. New York, NY: Routledge.
51. Ward, T., Melser, J., & Yates, P. M. (2007). Reconstructing the Risk-Need- Responsivity model: A theoretical elaboration and evaluation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 208–228.
52. Ward, T., & Stewart, C. (2003). Criminogenic needs and human needs: A theoretical model. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 9, 125–143.
53. Wormith, J. S. (2011). The Application of Andrewsian Psychology to Correctional Agencies. Symposium presented at the Second International Conference of Correctional and Criminal Justice Psychology. Toronto, June.