Genomic selection requires genomic control of inbreeding

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Sonesson, Anna K ^a   Woolliams, John A ^b,c   Meuwissen, Theo H E ^b  

^a Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences ^*

^b University of Life Sciences   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ESTIMATION METHOD; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOMICS; INBREEDING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; SIMULATION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOME; INBREEDING; PEDIGREE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, DOMESTIC; BAYES THEOREM; GENOME; INBREEDING; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84864961655     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-27     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Henderson C, Applications of Linear Models in Animal Breeding Canada: Guelph University Press 1984
2. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, Genetics 2001 157 1819 1829 11290733 (Pubitemid 32298846)
3. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Goddard ME, Genetica 2009 136 245 257 10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0 18704696
4. Assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identy-by-descent sharing between full siblings. Visscher PM, Medland SE, Ferreira MAR, Morley KI, Zhu G, Cornes BK, Montgomery GW, Martin NG, PLoS Genet 2006 2 41 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020041 16565746
5. The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Daetwyler HD, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA, Genetics 2010 185 1021 1031 10.1534/genetics.110.116855 20407128
6. Genetic architecture of complex traits and accuracy of genomic prediction: coat colour, milk-fat percentage, and type in Holstein cattle as contrasting model traits. Hayes BJ, Pryce J, Chamberlain AJ, Bowman PJ, Goddard ME, PLoS Genet 2010 6 1001139 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001139 20927186
7. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Meuwissen THE, J Anim Sci 1997 75 934 940 9110204 (Pubitemid 127441682)
8. Dynamic selection procedures for constrained inbreeding and their consequences for pedigree development. Grundy B, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA, Genet Res 1998 72 159 168 10.1017/S0016672398003474 (Pubitemid 28563163)
9. The distribution of the effects of genes affecting quantitative traits in livestock. Hayes B, Goddard ME, Genet Sel Evol 2001 33 209 229 10.1186/1297-9686-33-3-209 11403745 (Pubitemid 32591810)
10. The number of loci that affect milk production traits in dairy cattle. Chamberlain AJ, McPartlan HC, Goddard ME, Genetics 2007 177 1117 1123 10.1534/genetics.107.077784 17720910 (Pubitemid 350005659)
11. The accuracy of genomic selection in Norwegian red cattle assessed by cross-validation. Luan T, Woolliams JA, Lien S, Kent M, Svendsen M, Meuwissen THE, Genetics 2009 183 1119 1126 10.1534/genetics.109.107391 19704013
12. Genome partitioning of genetic variation for complex traits using common SNPs. Yang J, Manolio TA, Pasquale LR, Boerwinkle E, Caporaso N, Cunningham JM, de Andrade M, Feenstra B, Feingold E, Hayes MG, Hill WG, Landi MT, Alonso A, Lettre G, Lin P, Ling H, Lowe W, Mathias RA, Melbye M, Pugh E, Cornelis MC, Weir BS, Goddard ME, Visscher PM, Nat Genet 2011 43 519 525 10.1038/ng.823 21552263
13. Effect of linkage on the control of inbreeding in selection programmes. Fernández B, Santiago E, Toro MA, Caballero A, Genet Sel Evol 2000 32 249 264 10.1186/1297-9686-32-3-249 14736391 (Pubitemid 30415975)
14. Benefits from marker-assisted selection under an additive polygenic genetic model. Villanueva B, Pong-Wong R, Fernández J, Toro MA, J Anim Sci 2005 83 1747 1752 16024693
15. Restricting coancestry and inbreeding at a specific position on the genome by using optimized selection. Roughsedge T, Pong-Wong R, Woolliams JA, Villanueva B, Genet Res 2008 90 199 208 (Pubitemid 351586897)
16. Marker-assisted selection reduces expected inbreeding but can result in large effects of hitchhiking. Pedersen LD, Sorensen AC, Berg P, J Anim Breed Genet 2010 127 189 198 20536636
17. Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs. Sonesson AK, Meuwissen THE, Genet Sel Evol 2009 41 37 10.1186/1297-9686-41-37 19566932
18. Fisher RA, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection Oxford: Clarendon 1930
19. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Wright S, Genetics 1931 16 97 159 17246615
20. The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations. Kimura M, Genetics 1969 61 893 903 5364968
21. The combination of linkage values, and the calculation of distances between the loci of linked factors. Haldane JBS, J Genet 1919 8 299 309
22. Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA, PLoS One 2008 3 3395 10.1371/journal.pone.0003395
23. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Smith MJ, Haigh J, Genet Res 1974 23 23 35 10.1017/S0016672300014634 4407212
24. Inbreeding adjustments and effect on genetic trend estimates. VanRaden PM, Interbull Bull 2005 33 81 84