Novel strategies to minimize progeny inbreeding while maximizing genetic gain using genomic information

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 95, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 377-388

  Pryce, J E ^a,b   Hayes, B J ^a,b,c   Goddard, M E ^a,b,d  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES   (Australia)

^b University of Melbourne   (Australia)

^c LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Genomic; Inbreeding; Mating plan; Runs of homozygosity

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CATTLE; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPE; HOMOZYGOTE; INBREEDING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPES; HOMOZYGOTE; INBREEDING; MALE; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 84055189906     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4254     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Coster, A. 2010. Package to deal with pedigree data. Accessed Jan. 5, 2011. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pedigree/pedigree.pdf.
2. Daetwyler H.D., Villanueva B., Bijma P., Woolliams J.A. Inbreeding in genome-wide selection. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2007, 124:369-376.
3. Daetwyler H.D., Wiggans G.R., Hayes B.J., Woolliams J.A., Goddard M.E. Imputation of genotypes from sparse to high density using long-range phasing. Genetics 2011, doi:10.1534/genetics.111.128082.
4. Haile-Mariam M.E., Bowman P.J., Goddard M.E. A practical approach for minimising inbreeding and maximising genetic gain in dairy cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2007, 39:369-389.
5. Hayes B.J. Technical note: Efficient parentage assignment and pedigree reconstruction with dense single nucleotide polymorphism data. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:2114-2117.
6. Hayes B.J., Visscher P.M., Goddard M.E. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet. Res. (Camb.) 2009, 91:47-60.
7. Hayes B.J., Visscher P.M., McPartlan H.C., Goddard M.E. Novel multilocus measure of linkage disequilibrium to estimate past effective population size. Genome Res. 2003, 13:635-643.
8. Kinghorn B.P. Managing genetic change under operational and cost constraints. Proc. 36th National Congress of the South African Association of Animal Science 1998, 9-16.
9. Kinghorn B.P. An algorithm for efficient constrained mate selection. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2011, 43:4.
10. Kirin M., McQuillan R., Franklin C.S., Campbell H., McKeigue P.M., Wilson J.F. Genomic runs of homozygosity record population history and consanguinity. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e13996.
11. Lillehammer M., Meuwissen T.H.E., Sonesson A. A comparison of dairy cattle breeding designs that use genomic selection. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:493-500.
12. MacLeod I.M., Meuwissen T.H.E., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E. A novel predictor of multilocus haplotype homozygosity: Comparison with existing predictors. Genet. Res. (Camb.) 2009, 91:413-426.
13. Man, W. Y. N. 2004. Inbreeding in Australian Holstein Friesian cattle. PhD Thesis. University of Sydney, Australia.
14. Matukumalli L.K., Lawley C.T., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Allan M.F., Heaton M.P., O'Connell J., Moore S.S., Smith T.P.L., Sonstegard T.S., Van Tassell C.P. Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e5350.
15. Meuwissen T.H.E. Maximizing the response of selection with a predetermined rate of inbreeding. J. Anim. Sci. 1997, 75:934-940.
16. Meuwissen T.H.E., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001, 157:1819-1829.
17. Pryce J.E., Bolormaa S., Chamberlain A.J., Bowman P.J., Savin K., Goddard M.E., Hayes B.J. A validated genome wide association study in two dairy cattle breeds for variable length haplotypes. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:3331-3345.
18. Pryce J.E., Goddard M.E., Raadsma H.W., Hayes B.J. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:5455-5466.
19. Pryce J.E., van der Werf J.H.J., Haile-Mariam M., Malcolm B., Goddard M.E. Updated index weights for the Australian Profit Ranking in dairy cattle. Proc. Assoc. Advmt. Anim. Genet. 2009, 18:143-146.
20. Schaeffer L.R. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2006, 123:218-223.
21. Scheet P., Stephens M.A. A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: Applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 78:629-644.
22. Smith L.A., Cassell B.G., Pearson R.E. The effects of inbreeding on lifetime performance of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81:2729-2737.
23. Sonesson A.K., Woolliams J.A., Meuwissen T.H.E. Maximising genetic gain whilst controlling rates of genomic inbreeding using genomic optimum contribution selection. Proc. 9th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod 2010, Abstract 0892.
24. Toro M., Varona M. Genomic selection and mate allocation. Proc. 9th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod 2010, Abstract 0268.
25. VanRaden P.M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:4414-4423.
26. Wray N.R., Goddard M.E. Increasing long-term response to selection. Genet. Sel. Evol. 1994, 26:431-451.
27. Yang J., Benyamin B., McEvoy B.P., Gordon S., Henders A.K., Nyholt D.R., Madden P.A., Heath A.C., Martin N.G., Montgomery G.W., Goddard M.E., Visscher P.M. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:565-569.