Systematic review of perioperative and quality-of-life outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer

European Urology

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1097-1117

  MacLennan, Steven ^a   Imamura, Mari ^a   Lapitan, Marie C ^b   Omar, Muhammad Imran ^a   Lam, Thomas B L ^a,c   Hilvano Cabungcal, Ana M ^b   Royle, Pam ^d   Stewart, Fiona ^a,e   MacLennan, Graeme ^e   MacLennan, Sara J ^a   Dahm, Philipp ^f   Canfield, Steven E ^g   McClinton, Sam ^c   Griffiths, T R Leyshon ^h   Ljungberg, Börje ⁱ   N'Dow, James ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES MANILA   (Philippines)

^c ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^h LEICESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adrenalectomy; Cryoablation; HIFU; Localised renal cancer; Lymphadenectomy; Meta analysis; Nephron sparing surgery; Partial nephrectomy; Perioperative and quality of life outcomes; Radical nephrectomy; Radiofrequency ablation; Systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANCER SURGERY; CRYOTHERAPY; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY FUNCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MORBIDITY; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; NEPHRECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84868593970     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.028     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Guideline for management of the clinical stage 1 renal mass. American Urological Association Web site. http://www.auanet.org/resources.cfm?ID=442. Updated 2009. Accessed May 2011.
2. D. Delakas, I. Karyotis, and G. Daskalopoulos Nephron-sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma with a normal contralateral kidney: a European three-center experience Urology 60 2002 998 1002
3. K.G. Kwan, E.D. Matsumoto, R.J. Ablin, and P. Gold Radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation of renal tumours Curr Oncol 14 2007 34 38
4. J.S. Lam, O. Shvarts, and M. Alemozaffarder Nephron-sparing surgery as the new gold standard for T1 <= 7 cm renal cell carcinoma: results of a contemporary UCLA series J Urol 171 Suppl 2004 469
5. B. Ljungberg, N.C. Cowan, and D.C. Hanbury EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update Eur Urol 58 2010 398 406
6. C.T. Nguyen, S.C. Campbell, and A.C. Novick Choice of operation for clinically localized renal tumor Urol Clin North Am 35 2008 645 655
7. R.G. Uzzo, and A.C. Novick Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes J Urol 166 2001 6 18
8. P. Dahm, C.R. Chapple, and B.R. Konety The future of clinical practice guidelines in urology Eur Urol 60 2011 72 74
9. S. MacLennan, M. Imamura, and M.C. Lapitan Systematic review of oncological outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer Eur Urol 61 2012 972 993
10. Imamura M, MacLennan S, Lapitan MC, et al. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of surgical management for localised renal cell carcinoma. Aberdeen, UK: University of Aberdeen, Academic Urology Unit, October 2011. European Association of Urology Web site. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/refs/ LRCC-report-v19-20120216.pdf.
11. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.2. The Cochrane Col laboration, 2011. Cochrane Handbook Web site. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/. Accessed May 2011.
12. J.E. Ware Jr., and C.D. Sherbourne The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection Med Care 30 1992 473 483
13. Reeves B, Shea B, Wells G. Classifying non-randomised studies (NRS) and the assessing the risk of bias for a systematic review. Paper presented at: Workshop at 18th Cochrane Colloquium; 2010; Keystone, CO, USA.
14. J.P. Higgins, S.G. Thompson, J.J. Deeks, and D.G. Altman Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses BMJ 327 2003 557 560
15. B. Peng, J.-H. Zheng, D.-F. Xu, and J.-Z. Ren Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy and open nephrectomy for radical treatment of renal cell carcinoma: a comparison of clinical outcomes Acad J Second Military Med University 27 2006 1167 1169
16. C. Gratzke, M. Seitz, and F. Bayrle Quality of life and perioperative outcomes after retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy (RN), open RN and nephron-sparing surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma BJU Int 104 2009 470 475
17. A.K. Hemal, A. Kumar, and R. Kumar Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison J Urol 177 2007 862 866
18. M.M. Desai, B. Strzempkowski, and S.F. Matin Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy J Urol 173 2005 38 41
19. T. Nambirajan, S. Jeschke, and H. Al-Zahrani Prospective, randomized controlled study: transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy Urology 64 2004 919 924
20. R.B. Nadler, S. Loeb, and J.Q. Clemens A prospective study of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for T1 tumors - is transperitoneal, retroperitoneal or hand assisted the best approach? J Urol 175 2006 1230 1233
21. A.H. Gabr, Y. Gdor, S.A. Strope, W.W. Roberts, and J.S. Wolf Jr. Approach and specimen handling do not influence oncological perioperative and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy J Urol 182 2009 874 880
22. A.K. Hemal, and A. Kumar A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and robotic radical nephrectomy for T1-2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma World J Urol 27 2009 89 94
23. Y. Park, S. Lee, and J. Ku Laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma: comparison with conventional laparoscopic surgery J Endourol 23 Suppl 2009 A194
24. N. Soga, M. Kato, and S. Masui Comparison of radical nephrectomy techniques in one center: minimal incision portless endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery Int J Urol 15 2008 1018 1021
25. M. D'Armiento, R. Damiano, and B. Feleppa Elective conservative surgery for renal carcinoma versus radical nephrectomy: a prospective study Br J Urol 79 1997 15 19
26. H. Van Poppel, L. Da Pozzo, and W. Albrecht A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma Eur Urol 51 2007 1606 1615
27. V. Poulakis, U. Witzsch, R. de Vries, M. Moeckel, and E. Becht Quality of life after surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: comparison between radical nephrectomy and nephron-sparing surgery Urology 62 2003 814 820
28. B.P. Butler, A.C. Novick, D.P. Miller, S.A. Campbell, and M.R. Licht Management of small unilateral renal cell carcinomas: radical versus nephron-sparing surgery Urology 45 1995 34 40
29. J.H. Lee, C.H. You, and G.E. Min Comparison of the surgical outcome and renal function between radical and nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinomas Korean J Urol 48 2007 671 676
30. B. Shekarriz, J. Upadhyay, and H. Shekarriz Comparison of costs and complications of radical and partial nephrectomy for treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma Urology 59 2002 211 215
31. M.N. Simmons, B.I. Chung, and I.S. Gill Perioperative efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors larger than 4 cm Eur Urol 55 2009 199 208
32. A. Dash, A.J. Vickers, and L.R. Schachter Comparison of outcomes in elective partial vs radical nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma of 4-7 cm BJU Int 97 2006 939 945
33. I.S. Gill, L.R. Kavoussi, and B.R. Lane Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors J Urol 178 2007 41 46
34. B.R. Lane, and I.S. Gill 7-year oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy J Urol 183 2010 473 479
35. E.M. Gong, M.A. Orvieto, and K.C. Zorn Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy in clinical T1a renal tumors J Endourol 22 2008 953 957
36. M. Marszalek, H. Meixl, M. Polajnar, M. Rauchenwald, K. Jeschke, and S. Madersbacher Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients Eur Urol 55 2009 1171 1178
37. M. Aron, P. Koenig, and J.H. Kaouk Robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison from a high-volume centre BJU Int 102 2008 86 92
38. S.D. Wu, D.P. Viprakasit, and J. Cashy Radiofrequency ablation-assisted robotic laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without renal hilar vessel clamping versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes J Endourol 24 2010 385 391
39. M.M. Desai, M. Aron, and I.S. Gill Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal tumor Urology 66 Suppl 2005 23 28
40. R.L. O'Malley, A.D. Berger, and J.A. Kanofsky A matched-cohort comparison of laparoscopic cryoablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating renal masses BJU Int 99 2007 395 398
41. Y.H. Ko, H.S. Park, and G. Moon du A matched-cohort comparison of laparoscopic renal cryoablation using ultra-thin cryoprobes with open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal cell carcinoma Cancer Res Treat 40 2008 184 189
42. J.H.M. Blom, H. Van Poppel, and J.M. Maréchal Radical nephrectomy with and without lymph-node dissection: final results of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized phase 3 trial 30881 Eur Urol 55 2009 28 34
43. W.C. Huang, A.S. Levey, and A.M. Serio Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study Lancet Oncol 7 2006 735 740
44. A.C. Novick, and I. Derweesh Open partial nephrectomy for renal tumours: current status BJU Int 95 Suppl 2 2005 35 40
45. C.J. Weight, B.T. Larson, and A.F. Fergany Nephrectomy induced chronic renal insufficiency is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death and death from any cause in patients with localized cT1b renal masses J Urol 183 2010 1317 1323
46. H.J. Tan, E.C. Norton, and Z. Ye Long-term survival following partial vs radical nephrectomy among older patients with early-stage kidney cancer JAMA 307 2012 1629 1635
47. M. Sun, F. Abdollah, and S.F. Shariat Propensity-score matched comparison of complications, blood transfusions, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality between open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a national series Eur J Surg Oncol 38 2012 80 87
48. D.C. Kang, D.A. Palmer, and M. Zarei A systematic review of the quality of evidence of ablative therapy for small renal masses J Urol 187 2012 44 47
49. P. McCulloch, D.G. Altman, and W.B. Campbell No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations Lancet 374 2009 1105 1112
50. K.D. Baik, Y.H. Park, K.T. Kim, S.B. Lee, and H.H. Kim Comparative study on operative costs of laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma J Endourol 25 2011 A22 A23
51. Y.H. Park, K.D. Baik, K.T. Kim, S.B. Lee, and H.H. Kim Prospective randomized controlledtrial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma J Endourol 25 2011 A85 A86
52. K.J. Kiriluk, S.A. Shikanov, G.D. Steinberg, A.L. Shalhav, and D.A. Lifshitz Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic ablative therapy: a comparison of surgical and functional outcomes in a matched control study J Endourol 25 2011 1867 1872
53. M. Kates, G.M. Badalato, M. Pitman, and J.M. McKiernan Increased risk of overall and cardiovascular mortality after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma 2 cm or less J Urol 186 2011 1247 1253
54. H.J. Tan, J.S. Wolf Jr., Z. Ye, J.T. Wei, and D.C. Miller Population-level comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for patients with kidney cancer Cancer 117 2011 4184 4193
55. F. Altunrende, R. Autorino, and S. Hillyer Image guided percutaneous probe ablation for renal tumors in 65 solitary kidneys: functional and oncological outcomes J Urol 186 2011 35 41
56. F. Bouliere, M. Crepel, and P. Bigot Nephron-sparing surgery is superior to radical nephrectomy in preserving renal function outcome in tumors larger than 4 cm Prog Urol 21 2011 842 850
57. S.H. Jeon, T.G. Kwon, and K.H. Rha Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a retrospective analysis of multi-center results BJU Int 107 2011 817 821
58. S.A. Mir, S.L. Best, and C. Donnally III Minimally invasive nephrectomy: the influence of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery on patient selection, outcomes, and morbidity Urology 77 2011 631 634
59. C.R. Mitchell, T.D. Atwell, and A.J. Weisbrod Renal function outcomes in patients treated with partial nephrectomy versus percutaneous ablation for renal tumors in a solitary kidney J Urol 186 2011 1786 1790
60. T. Takagi, T. Kondo, and J. Iizuka Postoperative renal function after partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease: a comparison with radical nephrectomy Int J Urol 18 2011 472 476
61. M.A. White, R. Autorino, and G. Spana Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy: surgical technique and comparative outcomes Eur Urol 59 2011 815 822