Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic ablative therapy: A comparison of surgical and functional outcomes in a matched control study

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 25, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1867-1872

  Kiriluk, Kyle J ^a   Shikanov, Sergey A ^a   Steinberg, Gary D ^a   Shalhav, Arieh L ^a   Lifshitz, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABLATION THERAPY; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOMYOLIPOMA; ARTERY CLAMP; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; BODY MASS; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOABLATION; DATA BASE; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; EPIGASTRIC PAIN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; GROUPS BY AGE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYPERVOLEMIA; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY TUMOR; LAPAROSCOPIC ABLATIVE THERAPY; LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHRON SPARING SURGERY; ONCOCYTOMA; OPERATION DURATION; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; RETROPERITONEAL HEMATOMA; SMALL RENAL MASS; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE RETENTION;

ABLATION TECHNIQUES; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KIDNEY FUNCTION TESTS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 82455198705     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0087     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, et al. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1296-1305.
2. Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7:735-740.
3. Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, et al. Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2008;179:468-473.
4. Lamb GW, Bromwich EJ, Vasey P, Aitchison M. Management of renal masses in patients medically unsuitable for nephrectomy-natural history, complications, and outcome. Urology 2004;64:909-913.
5. Klatte T, Patard JJ, de Martino M, et al. Tumor size does not predict risk of metastatic disease or prognosis of small renal cell carcinomas. J Urol 2008;179:1719-1726.
6. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 2009;182: 1271-1279.
7. Gill IS, Novick AC, Meraney AM, et al. Laparoscopic renal cryoablation in 32 patients. Urology 2000;56:748-753.
8. Walther MC, Shawker TH, Libutti SK, et al. A phase 2 study of radio frequency interstitial tissue ablation of localized renal tumors. J Urol 2000;163:1424-1427.
9. Breda A, Finelli A, Janetschek G, et al. Complications of laparoscopic surgery for renal masses: Prevention, management, and comparison with the open experience. Eur Urol 2009;55:836-850.
10. Hegarty NJ, Gill IS, Desai MM, et al. Probe-ablative nephronsparing surgery: Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation. Urology 2006;68(suppl 1):7-13
11. Turna B, Kaouk JH, Frota R, et al. Minimally invasive nephron sparing management for renal tumors in solitary kidneys. J Urol 2009;182:2150-2157.
12. Lucas SM, Stern JM, Adibi M, et al. Renal function outcomes in patients treated for renal masses smaller than 4 cm by ablative and extirpative techniques. J Urol 2008;179:75-80.
13. Desai MM, Aron M, Gill IS. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal tumor. Urology 2005;66(suppl 5):23-28.
14. Bird VG, Carey RI, Ayyathurai R, Bird VY. Management of renal masses with laparoscopic-guided radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 2009;23:81-88.
15. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39(suppl 1): S1-S266.
16. Orvieto MA, Chien GW, Tolhurst SR, et al. Simplifying laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Technical considerations for reproducible outcomes. Urology 2005;66:976-980
17. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213.
18. Desai MM, Gill IS. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumour: Current status at the Cleveland Clinic. BJU Int 2005; 95(suppl 2):41-45.
19. Deane LA, Lee HJ, Box GN, et al. Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: A comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution. J Endourol 2008;22:947-952.
20. O'Malley RL, Berger AD, Kanofsky JA, et al. A matchedcohort comparison of laparoscopic cryoablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating renal masses. BJU Int 2007;99:395-398.
21. Weight CJ, Kaouk JH, Hegarty NJ, et al. Correlation of radiographic imaging and histopathology following cryoablation and radio frequency ablation for renal tumors. J Urol 2008;179:1277-1283.
22. Matin SF, Ahrar K, Cadeddu JA, et al. Residual and recurrent disease following renal energy ablative therapy: A multi-institutional study. J Urol 2006;176:1973-1977.
23. Kunkle DA, Uzzo RG. Cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation of the small renal mass: A meta-analysis. Cancer 2008; 113:2671-2680.
24. Klatte T, Mauermann J, Heinz-Peer G, et al. Perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of laparoscopic renal cryoablation and open partial nephrectomy: A matched pair analysis. J Endourol 2011;25:991-997.
25. Kunkle DA, Egleston BL, Uzzo RG. Excise, ablate or observe: The small renal mass dilemma-a meta-analysis and review. J. Urol 2008;179:1227-1234.