The future of clinical practice guidelines in urology

European Urology

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 72-74

  Dahm, Philipp ^a,b   Chapple, Christopher R ^c,l   Konety, Badrinath R ^d,m   Joyce, Adrian D ^e,f   Parsons, Keith ^g,h   Wolf Jr , J Stuart ^a,i   Razvi, Hassan ^j,n   N'Dow, James ^e,g,k  

^a American Urological Association   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE   (United Kingdom)

^d Societe Internationale de   (Canada)

^e British Association of Urological Surgeons   (United Kingdom)

^f ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^g Italy   (Netherlands)

^h ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^j Canadian Orthopaedic Association   (Canada)

^k UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^l ROYAL HALLAMSHIRE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^m UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FUTUROLOGY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UROLOGY;

FORECASTING; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; UROLOGY;

EID: 79957928832     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.04.007     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. T.M. Shaneyfelt, M.F. Mayo-Smith, and J. Rothwangl Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature JAMA 281 1999 1900 1905 (Pubitemid 29242803)
2. P. Dahm, L.L. Yeung, M. Gallucci, G. Simone, and H.J. Schünemann How to use a clinical practice guideline J Urol 181 2009 472 479
3. Canfield SE, Dahm P. Rating the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using GRADE. World J Urol. In press. DOI:10.1007/s00345-011- 0667-2.
4. M. Faraday, H. Hubbard, B. Kosiak, and R. Dmochowski Staying at the cutting edge: a review and analysis of evidence reporting and grading; the recommendations of the American Urological Association BJU Int 104 2009 294 297
5. Wolf JS Jr, Hubbard H, Faraday MM, Forrest JB. Clinical practice guidelines to inform evidence-based clinical practice. World J Urol. In press. DOI:10.1007/s00345-011-0656-5.
6. G. Aus, C. Chapple, and T. Hanûs The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines methodology: a critical evaluation Eur Urol 56 2009 859 864