Quality of life and perioperative outcomes after retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy (RN), open RN and nephron-sparing surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma

BJU International

Volumn 104, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 470-475

  Gratzke, Christian ^a,c   Seitz, Michael ^a   Bayrle, Florian ^a   Schlenker, Boris ^a   Bastian, Patrick J ^a   Haseke, Niko ^a   Bader, Markus ^a   Tilki, Derya ^a   Roosen, Alexander ^a   Karl, Alexander ^a   Reich, Oliver ^a   Wael Y Khoder, ^a   Wyler, Stephen ^b   Stief, Christian G ^a   Staehler, Michael ^a   Bachmann, Alexander ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

^c LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Health related quality of life (HRQoL); Nephron sparing surgery; Open radical nephrectomy; Renal cell carcinoma; Retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy

Indexed keywords

CREATININE;

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GERMANY; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; ILEUS; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL COMPONENT SUMMARY SCORE; MENTAL HEALTH; MORBIDITY; NEPHRECTOMY; NEPHRON SPARING SURGERY; OPEN RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATING ROOM PERSONNEL; OPERATION DURATION; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PNEUMOTHORAX; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROPERITONEOSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; SAFETY; SCORING SYSTEM; SEPSIS; SHORT FORM 36; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINE INCONTINENCE; WOUND INFECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEALTH STATUS; KIDNEY TUMOR; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEPHRON;

AGED; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; NEPHRONS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 69849089243     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08439.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. 1.Ljungberg B, Hanbury DC, Kuczyk MA et al. Renal cell carcinoma guideline. Eur Urol 2007; 51 : 1502-1510
2. Van Poppel H. Partial nephrectomy: the standard approach for small renal cell carcinoma? Curr Opin Urol 2003; 13 : 431-432
3. 3 Hollenbeck BK, Taub DA, Miller DC, D nn RL, Wei JT. N tional utilization trends of partial n phrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a ase of underutilization? Urology 2006; 67 : 254-259
4. Miller DC, Taub DA, Dunn RL, Wei JT, Hollenbeck BK. Laparoscopy for renal cell carcinoma: diffusion versus regionalization? J Urol 2006; 176 : 1102-1107
5. Bastide C, Paparel P, Guillonneau B. Minimally invasive surgery in oncologic urology: a recent review. Curr Opin Urol 2008; 18 : 190-197
6. Patel A, Wilson L, Blick C, Gurajala R, Rane A. Health-related quality of life after retroperitoneoscopic and handassisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Endourol 2005;19: 849-852
7. Porpiglia F, Volpe A, Billia M, Scarpa RM. Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy: analysis of the current literature. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 732-743
8. Colombo JR Jr, Haber GP, Jelovsek JE, Lane B, Novick AC, Gill IS. Seven years after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: oncologic and renal functional outcomes. Urology 2008; 71: 1149-1154
9. Lesage K, Joniau S, Fransis K, Van Poppel H. Comparison between open partial and radical nephrectomy for renal tumours: perioperative outcome and health-related quality of life. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 614-620
10. Ficarra V. Open radical nephrectomy versus open partial nephrectomy: is it still an issue? Eur Urol 2007; 51: 593-595
11. Dillenburg W, Poulakis V, Skriapas K et al. Retroperitoneoscopic versus open surgical radical nephrectomy for large renal cell carcinoma in clinical stage cT2 or cT3a: quality of life, pain and reconvalescence. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 314-1223
12. Poulakis V, Witzsch U, de Vries R, Moeckel M, Becht E. Quality of life after surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: comparison between radical nephrectomy and nephron-sparing surgery. Urology 2003; 62: 814-820
13. Shinohara N, Harabayashi T, Sato S, Hioka T, Tsuchiya K, Koyanagi T. Impact of nephron-sparing surgery on quality of life in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2001; 39: 114-119
14. Clark PE, Schover LR, Uzzo RG, Hafez KS, Rybicki LA, Novick AC. Quality of life and psychological adaptation after surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of the amount of remaining renal tissue. Urology 2001; 57: 252-256
15. Deger S, Wille A, Roigas J et al. Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy: techniques outcome. Eur Urol Suppl 2007; 6: 630-634
16. Robson CJ. Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1963; 89: 37-42
17. Traxer O, Gettman MT, Napper CA et al. The impact of intense laparoscopic skills training on the operative performance of urology residents. J Urol 2001; 166: 1658-1661
18. 18 Ficarra V, Novella G, Sarti A et al. Psycho-social well-being and general health status after surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma. Int Urol Nephrol 2002; 34: 441-446