The utilisation of a school self-evaluation instrument

Educational Studies

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 371-389

  Schildkamp, Kim ^a   Visscher, Adrie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Data use; Performance feedback; Quality care; School improvement; Self evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955789921     PISSN: 03055698     EISSN: 14653400     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03055690903424741     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Campbell, R.J., L. Kyriakides, R.D. Muijs, and W. Robinson. 2003. Differential teacher effectiveness: Towards a model for research and teacher appraisal. Oxford Review of Education 29, no. 3: 347-62.
2. Coe, R., and A.J. Visscher. 2002a. Introduction. In School improvement through performance feedback, ed. A.J. Visscher and R. Coe, xi-xix. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger BV.
3. Coe, R., and A.J. Visscher. 2002b. Drawing up the balance sheet for school performance feedback systems. In School improvement through performance feedback, ed. A.J. Visscher and R. Coe, 221-54. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger BV.
4. De Heus, P., R. van der Leeden, and B. Gazendam. 1995. Toegepaste data-analyse. Technieken voor niet-experimenteel onderzoek in de sociale wetenschappen [Applied data-analysis. Methods for non-experimental research in social sciences]. 's-Gravenhage: Elsevier Bedrijfsinformatie bv.
5. Eggens, T.J.H.M., and P.F. Sanders, eds. 1993. Psychometrie in de praktijk [Psychometrics in practice]. Arnhem: CITO.
6. Field, A. 2003. Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows. London: Sage.
7. Hammond, P., and T. Yeshanew. 2007. The impact of feedback on school performance. Educational Studies 33, no. 2: 99-113.
8. Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77, no. 1: 81-112.
9. Hendriks, M., and R. Bosker. 2003. ZEBO instrument voor zelfevaluatie in het basisonderwijs. Handleiding bij een geautomatiseerd hulpmiddel voor kwaliteitszorg in basisscholen [ZEBO instrument for self-evaluation in primary education. Manual for a computerassisted tool for quality care in primary education]. Enschede: Twente University Press.
10. Hendriks, M., S. Doolaard, and R.J. Bosker. 2002. Using school effectiveness as a knowledge base for self-evaluation in Dutch schools: The ZEBO-project. In School improvement through performance feedback, ed. A.J. Visscher and R. Coe, 115-42. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger BV.
11. Inspectie van het onderwijs. 2005. Toezichtkader primair onderwijs 2005. Inhoud en werkwijze van het inspectietoezicht [Supervision framework primary education 2005. Content and method of inspection]. Utrecht: Inspectie van het onderwijs.
12. Janssens, F.J.G. 2005. Toezicht in discussie. Over onderwijstoezicht en educational governance [Discussing supervision: About supervising educational governance]. Enschede: Universiteit Twente.
13. Kluger, A.N., and A. DeNisi. 1996. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin 119, no. 2: 254-84.
14. Marx, E.C.H., O.A. De Vries, S.A.M. Veenman, and P. Sleegers. 1995. School en klas [Teacher and class]. In Onderwijskunde: Een kennisbasis voor professionals [Educational science: A knowledge base for professionals], ed. J. Lowyck and N. Verloop, 43-77. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
15. Rossi, P.H., H.E. Freeman, and M.W. Lipsey. 1999. Evaluation: A systematic approach. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Scheerens, J., and R.J. Bosker. 1997. The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
17. Schildkamp, K. 2007. The utilisation of a self-evaluation for primary education. Enschede: Ipskamp.
18. Van Petegem, P., and J. Vanhoof. 2002a. Feedback of indicators to schools. In Benchmarking the quality of education, ed. J. Scheerens and M. Hendriksm, 131-62. Enschede: Universiteit Twente.
19. Van Petegem, P., and J. Vanhoof. 2002b. Flemish school school heads on their use of individual school feedback. In Benchmarking the quality of education, ed. J. Scheerens and M. Hendriks, 263-73. Enschede: Universiteit Twente.
20. Van Petegem, P., and J. Vanhoof. 2004. Feedback over schoolprestatie-indicatoren als strategisch instrument voor schoolontwikkeling? Lessen uit twee Vlaamse cases [Feedback on performance indicators as a strategic instrument for school development? Lessons from two Flemish cases]. Pedagogische Studiën 5: 338-53.
21. Visscher, A.J. 2002. A framework for studying school performance feedback systems. In School improvement through performance feedback, ed. A.J. Visscher and R. Coe, 41-72. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger BV.
22. Weiss, C.H. 1998a. Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation 19, no. 1: 21-33.
23. Weiss, C.H. 1998b. Improving the use of evaluations: Whose job is it anyway? In Advances in educational productivity, ed. A.J. Reynolds and H.J. Walberg, Vol. 7, 263-76. Greenwich/London: JAI Press.