The importance and perspectives of international studies in educational effectiveness

Educational Research and Evaluation

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 499-511

  Creemers, Bert P M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751532728     PISSN: 13803611     EISSN: 17444187     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13803610600873978     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Brookover, W. B., Beady, C., Flood, P., & Schweitzer, J. (1979). School systems and student achievement: Schools make a difference. New York: Praeger.
2. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16.
3. Campbell, R. J., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, R. D., & Robinson, W. (2004). Assessing teacher effectiveness: A differentiated model. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
4. Carney, S. (2003). Globalisation, neo-liberalism and the limitations of school effectiveness research in developing countries: The case of Nepal. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1(1), 87-101.
5. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733.
6. Carroll, J. B. (1989). The Carroll model: A 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Educational Researcher, 18, 26-31.
7. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. F., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D. et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
8. Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.
9. Creemers, B. P. M. (2002). From school effectiveness and school improvement to effective school improvement: Background, theoretical analysis, and outline of the empirical study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8(4), 343-362.
10. Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2006). Critical analysis of the current approaches to modelling educational effectiveness: The importance of establishing a dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(3), 347-366.
11. Davies, L. (2004). Comparative education in an increasingly globalised world. Comparative Education Bulletin, 7, 1-26.
12. De Jong, R., Westerhof, K. J., & Kruiter, J. H. (2004). Empirical evidence of a comprehensive model of school effectiveness: A multilevel study in mathematics in the first year of junior general education in the Netherlands. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(1), 3-31.
13. Driessen, G., & Sleegers, P. (2000). Consistency of teaching approach and student achievement: An empirical test. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(1), 57-79.
14. Edmonds, R. R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15-27.
15. Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel statistical models (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
16. Hopkins, D., Reynolds, D., & Gray, J. (1999). Moving on and moving up: Confronting the complexities of improvement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(1), 22-40.
17. Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H. et al. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effects of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.
18. International Organization for the Evaluation of Student Achievement (IEA). (2004a). Trends in mathematics and science studies: Mathematics 2003. Boston: TIMSS & Pirls International Study Center.
19. International Organization for the Evaluation of Student Achievement (IEA). (2004b). Trends in mathematics and science studies: Science 2003. Boston: TIMSS & Pirls International Study Center.
20. Kyriakides, L. (2005a). Extending the comprehensive model of educational effectiveness by an empirical investigation. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 103-152.
21. Kyriakides, L. (2005b, January). International comparative studies and educational effectiveness modeling: A secondary analysis of TIMSS 1999 data. Paper presented at the MORE Symposium at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement Conference, Barcelona, Spain.
22. Kyriakides, L., Campbell, R. J., & Gagatsis, A. (2000). The significance of the classroom effect in primary schools: An application of Creemers' comprehensive model of educational effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(4), 501-529.
23. Kyriakides, L., & Tsangaridou, N. (2004, April). School effectiveness and teacher effectiveness in physical education. Paper presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
24. Levine, D. U., & Lezotte, L. W. (1990). Unusually effective schools: A review and analysis of research and practice. Madison, WI: The National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.
25. Lubbers, M. (2004). Social Fabric of the Classroom. Peer Relations in Secondary Education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, GION, Groningen Institute for Educational Research, Groningen.
26. MacDonald, B. (1991). Critical introduction from innovation to reform - a framework for analysing change. In J. Rudduck (Ed.), Innovation and change: Developing involvement and understanding. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
27. Mortimore, P. (2001). Globalisation, effectiveness and improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(1), 229-249.
28. Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters: The junior years. Wells, UK: Open Books.
29. Monk, D. H. (1992). Education productivity research: An update and assessment of its role in education finance reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(4), 307-332.
30. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from Pisa 2003. Paris: OECD.
31. Reynolds, D. (2000). School effectiveness: The international dimension. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 232-256). London: Falmer Press.
32. Reynolds, D., Creemers, B. P. M., Bird, J., Farrell, S., & Swint, F. (1994). School effectiveness - the need for an international perspective. In D. Reynolds, B. P. M. Creemers, P. S. Nesselrodt, E. C. Schaffer, S. Stringfield, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Advances in school effectiveness research and practice. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
33. Reynolds, D., Creemers, B., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie C. (1998). Climbing an educational mountain: Conducting the International School Effectiveness Research Project (ISERP). In G. Walford (Ed.), Doing research about education (pp. 111-124). London: Falmer Press.
34. Reynolds, D., Creemers, B., Stringfield, S., Teddlie, C., & Schaffer, G. (Eds.). (2002). World class schools. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
35. Reynolds, D., Creemers, B. P. M., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2000). World class schools: Some preliminary findings from the international school effectiveness research project. In J. Peschar & M. Van der Wal (Eds.), Education contested: Changing relations between state, market and civil society in modern European education. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
36. Reynolds, D., Sullivan, M., & Murgatroyd, S. J. (1987). The comprehensive experiment. Lewes, UK: Falmer Press.
37. Rosenshine, B. (1983). Teaching functions in instructional programs. The Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 335-351.
38. Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., & Ouston, J. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours. London: Open Books.
39. Scheerens, J. (1992). Effective schooling: Research, theory and practice. London: Cassell.
40. Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
41. Scheerens, J., & Creemers, B. P. M. (1996). School effectiveness in the Netherlands: The modes influence of a research programme. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(2), 181-195.
42. Scheerens, J., Vermeulen, C. J. A. J., & Pelgrum, W. J. (1989). Generalizibility of instructional and school effectiveness indicators across nations. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(7), 789-799.
43. Schon, D. A. (1971). Beyond the stable state. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
44. Stringfield, S. C., & Slavin, R. E. (1992). A hierarchical longitudinal model for elementary school effects. In B. P. M. Creemers & G. J. Reezigt (Eds.), Evaluation of educational effectiveness (pp. 35-69). Groningen, The Netherlands: ICO, Interuniversity Center for Educational Research.
45. Sun, H. (2003). National contexts and effective school improvement. An exploratory study in eight European countries. Groningen, The Netherlands: GION, Groningen Institute for Educational Research.
46. Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press.
47. Thrupp, M. (2001). Sociological and political concerns about school effectiveness research: Time for a new research agenda. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(1), 7-40.
48. Townsend, T., Clarke, P., & Ainscow, M. (Eds.). (1999). Third millennium schools. A world of difference in school effectiveness and school improvement. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
49. Van der Werf, M. P. C. (2004, October). (Social) psychological factors as determinants of educational attainment in secondary education. Paper presented at the conference (Social) Psychological Factors as Determinants of Educational Attainment in Secondary Education, Groningen, The Netherlands.