Problem solving in MNCs: How local and global solutions are (and are not) created

Journal of International Business Studies

Volumn 43, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 746-771

  Tippmann, Esther ^a   Scott, Pamela Sharkey ^b   Mangematin, Vincent ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Ireland)

^c GRENOBLE ECOLE DE MANAGEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

case theoretic approaches; global learning; knowledge transfer and innovation in MNCs MNEs; knowledge seeking behavior; Multinational corporations (MNCs) and enterprises (MNEs); organizational learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868520490     PISSN: 00472506     EISSN: 14786990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2012.25     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. Ambos, T. C., Ambos, B., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. 2006. Learning from foreign subsidiaries: An empirical investigation of head-quarters' benefits from reverse knowledge transfers. Inter-national Business Review, 15(3): 294-312.
2. Ambos, T. C., Andersson, U., & Birkinshaw, J. 2010. What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational sub-sidiaries? Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7): 1099-1118.
3. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2002. The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary perfor-mance and competence development in the multi-national corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 979-997.
4. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. 1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3): 630-640.
5. Baden-Fuller, C., & Winter, S. 2007. Replicating knowledge practices: Principles or templates? London: Cass Business School, City University.
6. Baer, M., Dirks, K. T., & Nickerson,J. A. 2012. Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management Journal, advance online publication 17 July, doi: 10.1002/ smj.2004.
7. Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. 2004. Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4): 523-549.
8. Balogun, J., Jarzabkowski, P., & Vaara, E. 2011. Selling, resistance and reconciliation: A critical discursive approach to subsidiary role evolution in MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(6): 765-786.
9. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Managing across borders: The transnational solution, (2nd edn). London: Random House Business Books.
10. Beck, T. E., & Plowman, D. A. 2009. Experiencing rare and unusual events richly: The role of middle managers in animating and guiding organizational interpretation. Organi-zation Science, 20(5): 909-924.
11. Becker-Ritterspach, F. A. A., Saka-Helmhout, A., & Hotho, H. J. 2010. Learning in multinational enterprises as the socially embedded translation of practices. Critical Perspectives on InternationalBusiness, 6(1): 8-37.
12. Birkinshaw, J. 1997. Entrepreneurship in multinational corpora-tions: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18(3): 207-229.
13. Birkinshaw, J. 1999. The determinants and consequences of subsidiary initiative in multinational corporations. Entrepre-neurship: Theory & Practice, 24(1): 11-38.
14. Birkinshaw,J., Hood, N., & Jonsson, S. 1998. Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3): 221-241.
15. Birkinshaw, J., Brannen, M. Y., & Tung, R. L. 2011. From a distance and generalizable to up close and grounded: Reclaiming a place for qualitative methods in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5): 573-581.
16. Blomkvist, K., Kappen, P., & Zander, I. 2010. Quo vadis? The entry into new technologies in advanced foreign subsidiaries of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9): 1525-1549.
17. Boschma, R. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assess-ment. RegionalStudies, 39(1): 61-74.
18. Bouquet, C., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008. Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3): 577-601.
19. Bouquet, C., Morrison, A., & Birkinshaw, J. 2009. International attention and multinational enterprise performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1): 108-131.
20. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1997. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 1-34.
21. Buckley, P. J., & Carter, M. J. 2004. A formal analysis of knowledge combination in multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5): 371-384.
22. Burgelman, R. A. 1983. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2): 223-244.
23. Burgelman, R. A. 1991. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organization Science, 2(3): 239-262.
24. Carlile, P. R. 2002. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4): 442-455.
25. Ciabuschi, F., Forsgren, M., & Martin, O. M. 2011. Rationality vs ignorance: The role of MNE headquarters in subsidiaries' innovation processes. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(7): 958-970.
26. Cowan, D. A. 1990. Developing a classification structure of organizational problems: An empirical investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2): 366-390.
27. Cross, R., & Sproull, L. 2004. More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organization Science, 15(4): 446-462.
28. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. Behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29. Dellestrand, H., & Kappen, P. 2012. The effects of spatial and contextual factors on headquarters resource allocation to MNE subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(3): 219-243.
30. Dunbar, R. L. M., & Garud, R. 2009. Distributed knowledge and indeterminate meaning: The case of the Columbia shuttle flight. Organization Studies, 30(4): 397-421.
31. Edwards, T., & Tempel, A. 2010. Explaining variation in reverse diffusion of HR practices: Evidence from the German and British subsidiaries of American multinationals. Journal of World Business, 45(1): 19-28.
32. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532-550.
33. Felin, T., & Foss, N. J. 2009. Organizational routines and capabilities: Historical drift and a course-correction toward microfoundations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(2): 157-167.
34. Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. 2000. Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 154-177.
35. Floyd, S. W., & Wooldridge, B. 1999. Knowledge creation and social networks in corporate entrepreneurship: The renewal of organizational capability. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 23(3): 123-143.
36. Foss, N. J., & Pedersen, T. 2004. Organizing knowledge processes in the multinational corporation: An introduction. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5): 340-349.
37. Foss, N. J., Husted, K., & Michailova, S. 2010. Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: Levels of analysis, governance mechanisms, and research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3): 455-482.
38. Frost, T. S., Birkinshaw, J. M., & Ensign, P. C. 2002. Centers of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Manage-ment Journal, 23(11): 997-1018.
39. Galunic, C. D., & Rodan, S. 1998. Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schum-peterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12): 1193-1201.
40. Ghemawat, P. 2001. Distance still matters. The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8): 137-147.
41. Ghoshal, S. 1986. The innovative multinational: A differentiated network of organizational roles and management processes, Unpublished PhD dissertation, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
42. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. 1988. Creation, adoption, and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 365-388.
43. Gnyawali, D. R., Singal, M., & Mu, S. C. 2009. Knowledge ties among subsidiaries in MNCs: A multi-level conceptual model. Journal of International Management, 15(4): 387-400.
44. Golden, B. R. 1992. Research notes. The past is the past-or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4): 848-860.
45. Gray, P. H., & Meister, D. B. 2006. Knowledge sourcing methods. Information & Management, 43(2): 142-156.
46. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. 1991. Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 16(4): 768-792.
47. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. 2000. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4): 473-496.
48. Haas, M. R., & Hansen, M. T. 2007. Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 28(11): 1133-1153.
49. Hansen, M. T. 1999. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1): 82-111.
50. Hansen, M. T., & Løvás, B. 2004. How do multinationals leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8/9): 801-822.
51. Hansen, M. T., Mors, M. L., & Løvás, B. 2005. Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5): 776-793.
52. Hedlund, G. 1994. A model of knowledge management and the n-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15(Summer special issue): 73-90.
53. Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 9-30.
54. Holm, U., & Pedersen, T. 2000. The emergence and impact of MNC centres ofexcellence: A subsidiaryperspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
55. Huber, G. P., & Power, D. J. 1985. Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal, 6(2): 171-180.
56. Jarzabkowski, P. 2005. Strategy as practice: An activity-based approach. London: Sage.
57. Jick, T. D. 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4): 602-611.
58. Johnson, G., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. 2003. Micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity-based view. Journal of ManagementStudies, 40(1): 3-22.
59. Kanter, R. M. 1982. The middle manager as innovator. Harvard Business Review, 60(4): 95-105.
60. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4): 625-645.
61. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institu-tional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 215-233.
62. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2003. Social capital in multinational corporations and a micro-macro model of its formation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 297-317.
63. Lampel, J., Shamsie, J., & Shapira, Z. 2009. Experiencing the improbable: Rare events and organizational learning. Organi-zation Science, 20(5): 835-845.
64. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
65. Lyles, M. A. 1981. Formulating strategic problems: Empirical analysis and model development. Strategic Management Journal, 2(1): 61-75.
66. Lyles, M. A., & Mitroff, I. I. 1980. Organizational problem formulation: An empirical study. Administrative Science Quar-terly, 25(1): 102-119.
67. Mantere, S. 2008. Role expectations and middle managerstrategic agency. Journal of Management Studies, 45(2): 294-316.
68. Meyer, K. E., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. 2011. Multinational enterprises and local contexts: The opportunities and chal-lenges of multiple embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 235-252.
69. Miller, C. C., Cardinal, L. B., & Glick, W. H. 1997. Retro-spective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1): 189-204.
70. Mom, T.J. M., Van Den Bosch, F. A.J., & Volberda, H. W. 2007. Investigating managers' exploration and exploitation activ-ities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6): 910-931.
71. Monteiro, F., Arvidsson, N., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations: Explaining subsidiary isolation and its performance implications. Organization Science, 19(1): 90-107.
72. Morgan, K. 2004. The exaggerated death of geography: Learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(1): 3-21.
73. Mudambi, R., & Swift, T. 2009. Professional guilds, tension and knowledge management. Research Policy, 38(5): 736-745.
74. Nachum, L., & Zaheer, S. 2005. The persistence of distance? The impact of technology on MNE motivations for foreign investment. Strategic Management Journal, 26(8): 747-767.
75. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
76. Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Elements of a theory of human problem solving. Psychological Review, 65(3): 151-166.
77. Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. 2004. A knowledge-based theory of the firm: The problem-solving perspective. Organi-zation Science, 15(6): 617-632.
78. Nickerson, J., Yen, C. J., & Mahoney, J. T. 2012. Exploring the problem-finding and problem-solving approach fordesigning organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(1): 52-72.
79. Nohria, N., & Ghoshal, S. 1997. The differentiated network: Organizing multinational corporations for value creation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
80. Nonaka, I. 1994.Adynamic theoryo for ganizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1): 14-37.
81. Noorderhaven, N., & Harzing, A.-W. 2009. Knowledge-sharing and social interaction within MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(5): 719-741.
82. Nooteboom, B. 2000. Learning by interaction: Absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 4(1/2): 69-92.
83. Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., & van den Oord, A. 2007. Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36(7): 1016-1034.
84. Piscitello, L. 2011. Strategy, location, and the conceptual metamorphosis of the MNE. Global StrategyJournal, 1(1-2): 127-131.
85. Polanyi, M. 1966. The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Co.
86. Postrel, S. 2002. Islands ofshared knowledge: Specialization and mutual understanding in problem-solving teams. Organization Science, 13(3): 303-320.
87. Prahalad, C. K., & Doz, Y. L 1987. The multinational mission: Balancing local demands and global vision. New York: Free Press.
88. Qin, Y., Mudambi, R., & Meyer, K. E. 2008. Conventional and reverse knowledgeflows in multinational corporations. Journal of Management, 34(5): 882-902.
89. Rouleau, L., & Balogun, J. 2011. Middle managers, strategic sensemaking and discursive competence. Journal of Manage-ment Studies, 48(5): 953-983.
90. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 1992. A note on the transnational solution and the transaction cost theory of multinational strategic management. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 761-771.
91. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2001. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3): 237-251.
92. Rugman, A. M., Verbeke, A., & Wenlong, Y. 2011. Re-conceptualizing Bartlett and Ghoshal's classification of national subsidiary roles in the multinational enterprise. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 253-277.
93. Saka-Helmhout, A. 2009. Agency-based view of learning within the multinational corporation. Management Learning, 40(3): 258-274.
94. Saka-Helmhout, A. 2010. Organizational learning as a situated routine-based activity in international settings. Journal of World Business, 45(1): 41-48.
95. Simon, H. A. 1962. The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6): 467-482.
96. Simon, H. A. 1973. The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4(3-4): 181-201.
97. Simon, H. A., & Barenfeld, M. 1969. Information-processing analysis of perceptual processes in problem solving. Psycholo-gical Review, 76(5): 473-483.
98. Smith, G. F. 1988. Towards a heuristic theory of problem structuring. ManagementScience, 34(12): 1489-1506.
99. Smith, G. F. 1989. Defining managerial problems: A framework for prescriptive theorizing. Management Science, 35(8): 963-981.
100. Spender, J. C. 1989. Industry recipes: An enquiry into the nature and sources of managerial judgement. Oxford: Blackwell.
101. Starbuck, W. H. 2009. Cognitive reactions to rare events: Perceptions, uncertainty, and learning. Organization Science, 20(5): 925-937.
102. Tallman, S., & Chacar, A. S. 2011. Knowledge accumulation and dissemination in MNEs: A practice-based framework. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 278-304.
103. Tsang, E. W. K., & Yip, P. S. L. 2007. Economic distance and the survival offoreign direct investments. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5): 1156-1168.
104. Tushman, M. L., & Scanlan, T. J. 1981. Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their ante-cedents. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2): 289-305.
105. Vaccaro, A., Brusoni, S., & Veloso, F. M. 2011. Virtual design, problem framing, and innovation: An empirical study in the automotive industry. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1): 99-122.
106. van Wijk, R., Jansen,J.J. P., & Lyles, M. A. 2008. Inter-and intra-organizational knowledge transfer: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4): 830-853.
107. Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavilainen- Mäntymäki, E. 2011. Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5): 740-762.
108. Whittington, R. 2003. The work of strategizing and organizing: For a practice perspective. Strategic Organization, 1(1): 117-125.
109. Wilson, J. M., Boyer O'Leary, M., Metiu, A., & Jett, Q. R. 2008. Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organization Studies, 29(7): 979-1002.
110. Wooldridge, B., & Floyd, S. W. 1990. The strategy process, middle management involvement, and organizational perfor-mance. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3): 231-241.
111. Wooldridge, B., Schmid, T., & Floyd, S. W. 2008. The middle management perspective on strategy process: Contributions, synthesis, and future research. Journal of Management, 34(6): 1190-1221.
112. Wuyts, S., Colombo, M. G., Dutta, S., & Nooteboom, B. 2005. Empirical tests of optimal cognitive distance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 58(2): 277-302.
113. Yamin, M., Tsai, H.-J. S., & Holm, U. 2011. The performance effects of headquarters' involvement in lateral innovation transfers in multinational corporations. Management Interna-tional Review, 51(2): 157-177.
114. Zaheer, S., Schomaker, M. S., & Nachum, L. 2012. Distance without direction: Restoring credibility to a much-loved construct. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1): 18-27.