Quo vadis? the entry into new technologies in advanced foreign subsidiaries of the multinational enterprise

Journal of International Business Studies

Volumn 41, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1525-1549

  Blomkvist, Katarina ^a   Kappen, Philip ^a   Zander, Ivo ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

innovation and R D; longitudinal (or time series) studies; multinational corporations (MNCs) and enterprises (MNEs); subsidiary development, expansion, and growth; subsidiary roles

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649568820     PISSN: 00472506     EISSN: 14786990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2010.22     Document Type: Article

References (118)

1. Abu-Libdeh, H., Turnbull, B. W., & Clark, L. C. 1990. Analysis of multi-type recurrent events in longitudinal studies: Application to a skin cancer prevention trial. Biometrics, 46(4): 1017-1034.
2. Allison, P. D. 1995. Survival analysis using the SAS system: A practical guide. Cary, NC: The SAS Institute.
3. Allison, P. D. 1996. Fixed-effects partial likelihood for repeated events. Sociological Methods and Research, 25(2): 207-222.
4. Almeida, P. 1996. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter): 155-165.
5. Almeida, P., & Phene, A. 2004. Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9): 847-864.
6. Andersson, U., & Forsgren, M. 1996. Subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation. International Business Review, 5(5): 487-508.
7. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2002. The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 979-996.
8. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2007. Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: A business network view. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5): 802-818.
9. Archibugi, D., & Pianta, M. 1992. Specialization and size of technological activities in industrial countries: The analysis of patent data. Research Policy, 21(1): 79-93.
10. Asakawa, K. 2001. Organizational tension in international R&D management: The case of Japanese firms. Research Policy, 30(5): 735-757.
11. Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. 1998. International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1): 7-26.
12. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
13. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1990. The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review, 15(4): 603-625.
14. Beck, N., Katz, J. N., & Tucker, R. 1998. Taking time seriously: Time-series cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 42(4): 1260-1288.
15. Belderbos, R. 2003. Entry mode, organizational learning, and R&D in foreign affiliates: Evidence from Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 24(3): 235-259.
16. Bertrand, O., & Zuniga, P. 2006. R&D and M&A: Are cross-border M&A different? An investigation on OECD countries. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(2): 401-423.
17. Birkinshaw, J. 1999. The determinants and consequences of subsidiary initiative in multinational corporations. Entrepre-neurship Theory and Practice, 24(1): 9-36.
18. Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. 1998a. Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 773-795.
19. Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. (Eds) 1998b. Multinational corporate evolution and subsidiary development. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
20. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & Zorn, C. 2002. Duration models for repeated events. The Journal of Politics, 64(4): 1069-1094.
21. Brouthers, K., & Brouthers, L. 2001. Explaining the national cultural distance paradox. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1): 177-189. (Pubitemid 33585065)
22. Cantwell, J. 1989. Technological innovation and multinational corporations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
23. Cantwell, J. 1991. The international agglomeration of R&D. In M. Casson (Ed.), Global research strategy and international competitiveness: 104-132. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
24. Cantwell, J. 1995. Multinational corporations and innovatory activities: Towards a new, evolutionary approach. In J. Molero (Ed.), Technological innovation, multinational corporations and international competitiveness: 21-58. Reading, UK: Harwood Academic Publishers.
25. Cantwell, J., & Janne, O. 2000. The role of multinational corporations and national states in the globalization of innovatory capacity: The European perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12(2): 243-262.
26. Cantwell, J., & Mudambi, R. 2005. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12): 1109-1128.
27. Cantwell, J., & Narula, R. 2001. The eclectic paradigm in the global economy. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2): 155-172.
28. Cantwell, J., & Piscitello, L. 2000. Accumulating technological competence: Its changing impact on corporate diversification and internationalization. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(1): 21-49.
29. Cantwell, J., & Santangelo, G. D. 2000. Capitalism, profits and innovation in the new techno-economic paradigm. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10(1/2): 131-157.
30. Chiesa, V. 1995. Globalizing R&D around centres of excellence. Long Range Planning, 28(6): 19-28.
31. Delaney, E. 1998. Strategic development of multinational subsidiaries in Ireland. In J. Birkinshaw & N. Hood (Eds), Multinational corporate evolution and subsidiary development: 239-267. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
32. Dosi, G. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3): 147-162.
33. Dougherty, D., & Hardy, C. 1996. Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5): 1120-1153.
34. Doz, Y., & Prahalad, C. K. 1991. Managing DMNCs: A search for a new paradigm. Strategic Management Journal, 12(Summer): 145-164.
35. Drogendijk, R., & Slangen, A. 2006. Hofstede, Schwartz, or managerial perceptions? The effects of different cultural distance measures on establishment mode choices by multinational enterprises. International Business Review, 15(4): 361-380.
36. Dunning, J. H. 1994. Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity. Research Policy, 23(1): 67-88.
37. Ensign, P. C., Birkinshaw, J. M., & Frost, T. S. 2000. R&D centres of excellence in Canada. In U. Holm & T. Pedersen (Eds), The emergence and impact of MNC centres of excellence: A subsidiary perspective: 131-153. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
38. Ezell, M. E., Land, K. C., & Cohen, L. E. 2003. Modeling multiple failure time data: A survey of variance-corrected proportional hazard models with empirical applications to arrest data. Sociological Methodology, 33: 111-167.
39. Feinberg, S. E., & Gupta, A. K. 2004. Knowledge spillovers and the assignment of R&D responsibilities to foreign subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8/9): 823-845.
40. Feldman, M. P. 2000. Location and innovation: The new economic geography of innovation, spillovers, and agglomeration. In G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman & M. P. Gertler (Eds), The Oxford handbook of economic geography: 373-394. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Forsgren, M. 2008. Theories of the multinational firm: A multidimensional creature in the global economy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
42. Forsgren, M., & Pedersen, T. 2000. Subsidiary influence and corporate learning: Centres of excellence in Danish foreign-owned firms. In U. Holm & T. Pedersen (Eds), The emergence and impact of MNC centres of excellence: A subsidiary perspective: 68-78. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
43. Forsgren, M., Holm, U., & Johanson, J. 1995. Division headquarters go abroad: A step in the internationalization of the multinational corporation. Journal of Management Studies, 32(4): 475-491.
44. Forsgren, M., Johanson, J., & Sharma, D. 2000. Development of MNC centres of excellence. In U. Holm & T. Pedersen (Eds), The emergence and impact of MNC centres of excellence: A subsidiary perspective: 45-67. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
45. Fratocchi, L., & Holm, U. 1998. Centres of excellence in the international firm. In J. Birkinshaw & N. Hood (Eds), Multinational corporate evolution and subsidiary development: 189-212. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
46. Frost, T. S. 2001. The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries' innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2): 101-123.
47. Furu, P. 2000. Characteristics of R&D centres of excellence in MNCs. In U. Holm & T. Pedersen (Eds), The emergence and impact of MNC centres of excellence: A subsidiary perspective: 200-218. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
48. Gerybadze, A., & Reger, G. 1999. Globalization of R&D: Recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations. Research Policy, 28(2-3): 251-274.
49. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. 1988. Creation, adoption and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 365-388.
50. Hagedoorn, J., & Cloodt, M. 2003. Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32(8): 1365-1379.
51. Hair Jr, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. 1998. Multivariate data analysis, (5th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
52. Håkanson, L., & Nobel, R. 1993a. Determinants of foreign R&D in Swedish multinationals. Research Policy, 22(5-6): 397-411.
53. Håkanson, L., & Nobel, R. 1993b. Foreign research and development in Swedish multinationals. Research Policy, 22(5-6): 373-396.
54. Håkanson, L., & Zander, U. 1986. Managing international research and development. Stockholm: Sveriges Mekanförbund.
55. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. 1994. Competing for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
56. Hedlund, G. 1986. The hypermodern MNC: A heterarchy? Human Resource Management, 25(1): 9-35.
57. Hedlund, G., & Åman, P. 1984. Managing relationships with foreign subsidiaries: Organization and control in Swedish MNCs. Stockholm: Sveriges Mekanförbund.
58. Hedlund, G., & Ridderstråle, J. 1995. International development projects: Key to competitiveness, impossible, or mismanaged? International Studies of Management and Organization, 25(1-2): 121-157.
59. Hitt, M., Hoskisson, R., Ireland, R., & Harrison, J. 1991. Effects of acquisitions on R&D inputs and outputs. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3): 693-706.
60. Hitt, M., Hoskisson, R., Johnson, R., & Moesel, D. 1996. The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5): 1084-1119.
61. Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations, (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
62. Holm, U., & Pedersen, T. (Eds) 2000. The emergence and impact of MNC centres of excellence: A subsidiary perspective. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
63. Jaffe, A. B. 1986. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms' patents, profits, and market value. American Economic Review, 76(5): 984-1001.
64. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577-598.
65. Jiang, S.-T., Landers, T. L., & Rhoads, T. R. 2005. Semiparametric proportional intensity models robustness for right-censored recurrent failure data. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 90(1): 91-98.
66. Jiang, S.-T., Landers, T. L., & Rhoads, T. R. 2006. Assessment of repairable-system reliability using proportional intensity models: A review. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 55(2): 328-336.
67. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23-32.
68. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 1990. The mechanism of internationalization. International Marketing Review, 7(4): 11-24.
69. Kappen, P. 2009. Technological evolution in foreign subsidiaries: Among average Joes, superstars and the new kids on the block, Doctoral thesis No. 141, Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University.
70. Kelly, P. J., & Lim, L. L.-Y. 2000. Survival analysis for recurrent event data: An application to childhood infectious diseases. Statistics in Medicine, 19(1): 13-33.
71. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 411-432.
72. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3): 383-397.
73. Kuemmerle, W. 1997. Building effective R&D capabilities abroad. Harvard Business Review, 75(2): 61-70.
74. Lawless, J. F., Wigg, M. B., Tuli, S., Drake, J., & Lamberti-Pasculli, M. 2001. Analysis of repeated failures of durations, with application to shunt failures for patients with paediatric hydrocephalus. Applied Statistics, 50(4): 449-465. (Pubitemid 33405908)
75. Mudambi, R. 1998. The role of duration in multinational investment strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(2): 239-262.
76. Mudambi, R. 2008. Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(5): 699-725.
77. Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. 2004. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5): 385-406.
78. Narula, R. 2002. Innovation systems and "inertia" in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systemic lock-in. Research Policy, 31(5): 795-816.
79. Papanastassiou, M. 1999. Technology and production strategies of multinational enterprise (MNE) subsidiaries in Europe. International Business Review, 8(2): 213-232.
80. Papanastassiou, M., & Pearce, R. D. 1998. Individualism and interdependence in the technological development of MNEs: The strategic positioning of R&D in overseas subsidiaries. In J. Birkinshaw & N. Hood (Eds), Multinational corporate evolution and subsidiary development: 50-75. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
81. Patel, P. 1995. Localised production of technology for global markets. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1): 141-153.
82. Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. 1991. Large firms in the production of the world's technology: An important case of "non-globalization". Journal of International Business Studies, 22(1): 1-21.
83. Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. 1995. The localized creation of global technological advantage. In J. Molero (Ed.), Technological innovation, multinational corporations and new international competitiveness: The case of intermediate countries: 59-74. New York: Harwood Academic.
84. Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. 1998. The wide (and increasing) spread of technological competencies in the world's largest firms: A challenge to conventional wisdom. In A. D. Chandler, P. Hagström & Ö. Sölvell (Eds), The dynamic multinational firm: 192-213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
85. Pavitt, K. 1988a. International patterns of technological accumulation. In N. Hood & J.-E. Vahlne (Eds), Strategies in global competition: 126-157. London: Croom Helm.
86. Pavitt, K. 1988b. Uses and abuses of patent statistics. In A. F. J. van Raan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology: 509-536. North-Holland: Elsevier Science.
87. Pearce, R. D. 1989. The internationalisation of research and development by multinational enterprises. London: Macmillan.
88. Pearce, R. D. 1999a. The evolution of technology in multinational enterprises: The role of creative subsidiaries. International Business Review, 8(2): 125-148.
89. Pearce, R. D. 1999b. Decentralised R&D and strategic competitiveness: Globalised approaches to generation and use of technology in multinational enterprises (MNEs). Research Policy, 28(2-3): 157-178.
90. Pearce, R. D., & Papanastassiou, M. 1999. Overseas R&D and the strategic evolution of MNEs: Evidence from laboratories in the UK. Research Policy, 28(1): 23-41.
91. Phene, A., & Almeida, P. 2008. Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5): 901-919.
92. Porter, M. E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
93. Powell, W. W., & Snellman, K. 2004. The knowledge economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 30: 199-220.
94. Randoy, T., & Li, J. 1998. Global resource flows and MNE network integration. In J. Birkinshaw & N. Hood (Eds), Multinational corporate evolution and subsidiary development: 76-101. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
95. Reger, G. 2002. Internationalisation of research and development in Western European, Japanese and North American multinationals. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 2(2/3): 164-185.
96. Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. 1985. Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 10(3): 435-454.
97. Ronstadt, R. C. 1978. International R&D: The establishment and evolution of research and development abroad by seven US multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 9(1): 7-24.
98. Sahal, D. 1985. Technological guideposts and innovation avenues. Research Policy, 14(2): 61-82.
99. Schmookler, J. 1950. The interpretation of patent statistics. Journal of the Patent Office Society, 32(2): 123-146.
100. Schwartz, S. 1994. Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi & G. Yoon (Eds), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, methods, and applications: 85-122. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
101. Singh, J. 2007. Asymmetry of knowledge spillovers between MNCs and host country firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5): 764-786.
102. Smith, K. G., Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. 2005. Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2): 346-357.
103. The Conference Board Total Economy database. (2008). GGDC. December, http://www.conference-board.org/economics/database.cfm.
104. Therneau, T. M., & Hamilton, S. A. 1997. rhDNase as an example of recurrent event analysis. Statistical Medicine, 16(18): 2029-2047.
105. UNCTAD. 2005. World investment report: Transnational corporations and the internationalization of R&D. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
106. Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 35-67.
107. Verbeke, A., & Kenworthy, T. P. 2008. Multidivisional vs metanational governance of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6): 940-956.
108. Verbeke, A., Chrisman, J. J., & Yuan, W. 2007. A note on strategic renewal and corporate venturing in the subsidiaries of multinational enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(4): 585-600.
109. Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. 2001. Learning through acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3): 457-476.
110. Wallmark, T., & McQueen, D. 1986. 100 viktiga innovationer under tiden 1945-1980, [100 important innovations over the period 1945-1980] Studentlitteratur.
111. Wortmann, M. 1990. Multinationals and the internationalization of R&D: New developments in German companies. Research Policy, 19(2): 175-183.
112. Yamin, M. 2002. Subsidiary entrepreneurship and the advantage of multinationality. In V. Havila, M. Forsgren & H. Håkanson (Eds), Critical perspectives on internationalization: 133-150. Amsterdam: Pergamon Press.
113. Yamin, M., & Forsgren, M. 2006. Hymer's analysis of the multinational organization: Power retention and the demise of the federative MNE. International Business Review, 15(2): 166-179.
114. Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341-363.
115. Zaheer, S., & Mosakowski, E. 1997. The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal, 18(6): 439-463.
116. Zander, I. 1998. The evolution of technological capabilities in the multinational corporation: Dispersion, duplication and potential advantages from multinationality. Research Policy, 27(1): 17-35.
117. Zander, I. 1999. Whereto the multinational? The evolution of technological capabilities in the multinational network. International Business Review, 8(3): 261-291.
118. Zander, I., & Zander, U. 1996. The oscillating multinational firm: Alfa Laval in the period 1890-1990. In I. Björkman & M. Forsgren (Eds), The nature of the international firm: Nordic contributions to international business research: 89-115. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.