Ecological efficiency of voluntary conservation of Boreal-forest biodiversity;Eficiencia ecoĺogica de la conservacíon voluntaria de la biodiversidad de bosques boreales

Conservation Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 339-347

  Mönkkönen, Mikko ^a   Ylisirniö, Anna Liisa ^b   Hämäläinen, Tanja ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAPLAND   (Finland)

^c NONE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Coarse woody debris; Conservation programs; Epiphytic lichens; Polypore fungi; Privately owned land; Protected areas

Indexed keywords

BOREAL FOREST; COARSE WOODY DEBRIS; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EPIPHYTE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FUNGUS; INCENTIVE; LICHEN; NATURE CONSERVATION; PROTECTED AREA; SITE SELECTION;

ARCTIC; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FINLAND; LICHENS; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME; TREE;

ARCTIC REGIONS; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; FINLAND; LICHENS; TIME FACTORS; TREES;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

FUNGI;

EID: 62549095862     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01082.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ahti, T., P. M. Jorgensen, H. Kristinsson, R. Moberg, U. Sochting, and G. Thor, editors. 1999. Nordic lichen flora. Volume 1. Calicioid lichens and fungi. Nordic Lichen Society, Uddevalla, Sweden.
2. Ando, A., J. Camm, S. Polasky, and A. Solow. 1998. Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science 279 : 2126 2128.
3. Angelstam, P., and L. Andersson. 2001. Estimates of the needs for forest reserves in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research Supplement 3 : 38 51.
4. Anonymous. 2003. Conservation biological criteria for forest protection in southern Finland. Finnish environment 634. Ministry of the environment, Helsinki.
5. Bader, P., S. Jansson, and B. G. Jonsson. 1995. Wood-inhabiting fungi and substratum decline in selectively logged boreal spruce forests. Biological Conservation 72 : 355 362.
6. Balmford, A., and T. Whitten. 2003. Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the costs be met? Oryx 37 : 238 250.
7. Dettki, H., and P.-A. Esseen. 2003. Modelling long-term effects of forest management on epiphytic lichens. Forest Ecology and Management 175 : 223 238.
8. Esseen, P. A., K. E. Renhorn, and R. B. Petersson. 1996. Epiphytic lichen biomass in managed and old-growth boreal forests: effect of branch quality. Ecological Applications 6 : 228 238.
9. Halme, P., et al. 2008. Perennial polypores as indicators of annual and red-listed polypores. Ecological Indicators. In press.
10. Hanski, I. 2005. The shrinking world: ecological consequences of habitat loss. Pages 1-307 in O. Kinne, editor. Excellence in ecology. Volume 14. International Ecology Institute, Oldendorf-Luhe, Germany.
11. Innes, R., S. Polasky, and J. Tschirhart. 1998. Takings, compensation and endangered species protection on private lands. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 : 35 52.
12. Jonsson, B. G., and M. Jonsell. 1999. Exploring potential biodiversity indicators in boreal forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 8 : 1417 1433.
13. Junninen, K., M. Similä, J. Kouki, and H. Kotiranta. 2006. Assemblages of wood-inhabiting fungi along the gradients of succession and naturalness in boreal pine-dominated forests in Fennoscandia. Ecography 29 : 75 83.
14. Juutinen, A., and M. Mönkkönen. 2007. Alternative targets and economic efficiency of selecting protected areas for biodiversity conservation in boreal forest. Environmental and Resource Economics 37 : 713 732.
15. Juutinen, A., M. Mönkkönen, and A.-L. Sippola. 2006. Cost-efficiency of decaying wood as a surrogate for overall species richness in boreal forests. Conservation Biology 20 : 74 84.
16. Juutinen, A., E. Mäntymaa, M. Mönkkönen, and R. Svento. 2008. Voluntary agreements in protecting privately owned forests in Finland - to buy or to lease? Forest Policy and Economics 10 : 230 239.
17. Knight, R. L. 1999. Private lands: the neglected geography. Conservation Biology 13 : 223 224.
18. Knight, A. T., and R. M. Cowling. 2007. Embracing opportunism in the selection of priority conservation areas. Conservation Biology 21 : 1124 1126.
19. Kotiranta, H., and T. Niemelä. 1996. Threatened polypores in Finland. Ympäristöopas (in Finnish with English summary). Finnish environment 10. Finnish Environment Institute, Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki.
20. Kuusinen, M. 1995. Cyanobacterial macrolichens on Populus tremula as indicators of forest continuity in Finland. Biological Conservation 75 : 43 49.
21. McCune, B. 1993. Gradients in epiphyte biomass in three Pseudotsuga-Tsuga forests of different ages in westerns Oregon and Washington. Bryologist 96 : 405 411.
22. Margules, C. R., and R. L. Pressey. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405 : 243 253.
23. Martikainen, P. J., Siitonen, P. Punttila, L. Kaila, and J. Rauf. 2000. Species richness of Coleoptera in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland. Biological Conservation 94 : 199 209.
24. Mönkkönen, M., A. Juutinen, and E. Hurme. 2008. Setting targets: trade-offs between ecology and economics. Pages 328 351 in M.-A. Villard, P. Drapeau, and B. G. Jonsson, editors. Setting conservation targets for managed forest landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
25. Niemelä, T. 2005. Käävät - puiden sienet. Helsingin yliopiston Luonnontieteellinen keskusmuseo, kasvimuseo, Helsinki.
26. Nilsson, C., and F. Götmark. 1992. Protected areas in Sweden: is natural variety adequately represented. Conservation Biology 6 : 232 242.
27. Penttilä, R., J. Siitonen, and M. Kuusinen. 2004. Polypore diversity in managed and old-growth boreal Picea abies forests in southern Finland. Biological Conservation 117 : 271 283.
28. Penttilä, R., M. Lindgren, O. Miettinen, H. Rita, and I. Hanski. 2006. Consequences of forest fragmentation for polyporous fungi at two spatial scales. Oikos 114 : 225 240.
29. Pressey, R. L. 1994. Ad hoc reservations: forward or backward steps in developing representative reserve systems? Conservation Biology 8 : 662 668.
30. Rassi, P., A. Alanen, T. Kanerva, and I. Mannerkoski, editors. 2001. The 2000 red list of Finnish species. Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki (in Finnish).
31. Rosenzweig, M. L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
32. Segerson, K., and T. Miceli. 1998. Voluntary environmental agreements: good or bad news for environmental protection? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36 : 109 130.
33. Siitonen, J. 2001. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecological Bulletins 49 : 11 41.
34. Similä, M., J. Kouki, M. Mönkkönen, A.-L. Sippola, and E. Huhta. 2006. Co-variation and indicators of species diversity: can richness of forest-dwelling species be predicted in northern boreal forests? Ecological Indicators 6 : 686 700.
35. Sippola, A.-L., and P. Renvall. 1999. Wood-decomposing fungi and seed-tree cutting -a 40-year perspective. Forest Ecology and Management 115 : 183 201.
36. Sippola, A.-L., T. Lehesvirta, and P. Renvall. 2001. Effects of selective logging on coarse woody debris and diversity of wood-decaying polypores in Eastern Finland. Ecological Bulletins 49 : 243 254.
37. Smith, R., and J. Shogren. 2002. Voluntary incentive design for endangered species protection. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43 : 169 187.
38. Stokland, J. N. 1997. Representativeness and efficiency of bird and insect conservation in Norwegian boreal forest reserves. Conservation Biology 11 : 101 111.
39. Stokland, J. N., S. M. Tomter, and U. Söderberg. 2004. Development of dead wood indicators for biodiversity monitoring: experiences from Scandinavia. Pages 205 226 in M. Marchetti, editor. Monitoring and indicators of forest biodiversity in Europe - from ideas to operationality. EFI proceedings 51. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland.
40. Tonteri, T., and J. Siitonen. 2001. Lahopuu talousmetsissä valtakunnan metsien 9. inventoinnin tulosten mukaan - vertailu luonnonmetsiin. Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja 812 : 57 72.
41. Virkkala, R. 1996. Reserve network of forests in Finland and the need for developing the network - an ecological approach. Finnish environment 16. Finnish Environment Institute, Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki.
42. Virkkala, R., K. T. Korhonen, R. Haapalainen, and K. Aapala. 2000. Protected forests and mires in forest and mire vegetation zones in Finland based on the 8th National Forest Inventory. Finnish environment 395. Finnish Environment Institute, Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki.
43. Vitikainen, O., T. Ahti, M. Kuusinen, S. Lommi, and T. Ulvinen. 1997. Checklist of lichens and allied fungi of Finland. Norrlinia 6. University of Helsinki, Central Museum of Natural History, Botanical Museum, Helsinki.
44. Wätzold, F., and K. Schwerdtner. 2005. Why be wasteful when preserving a valuable resource? A review article on the cost-effectiveness of European biodiversity conservation policy. Biological Conservation 123 : 327 338.