Institutions, environmental management and long-term ecological sustenance

Ambio

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 112-117

  Hukkinen, Janne ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAPLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031922669     PISSN: 00447447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Groombridge, B. (ed.). 1992. Global Biodiversity: Status of the Earth's Living Resources. Compiled by World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Chapman & Hall, London.
2. Redclift, M. 1992. Sustainable Development: Exploring the Contradictions. Routledge, London.
3. World Commission on Environment and Development. 1990. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
4. Norgaard, R.B. 1994. Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and a Coevolutionary Revisioning of the Future. Routledge, London.
5. Kurki-Suonio, I. and Heikkilä, M. (eds). 1994. Kestävän kehityksen edellytykset Suomessa: Imatran Voima Oy:n 60-vuotisjuhlajulkaisu (Preconditions of Sustainable Development in Finland). Tammi, Helsinki. (In Finnish).
6. Hukkinen, J. 1990. Unplugging Drainage: Toward Sociotechnical Redesign of San Joaquin Valley's Agricultural Drainage Management. Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering. University of California, Berkeley.
7. Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A. 1983. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley.
8. North, D. 1992. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. For an in-depth analysis of institutional questions in smaller scale environmental management projects, see Ostrom, E. 1994. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. Festinger, L. 1962. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
11. Assmuth, T., Poutanen, H., Strandberg, T., Melanen, M., Penttilä, S. and Kalevi, K. 1990. Environmental Impacts of Hazardous Wastes in Landfills. Series A:67. National Board of Waters and the Environment, Helsinki. (In Finnish, summary in English).
12. Vahvelainen, S. and Isaksson, K.-E. 1992. Industrial waste. Environment Series 1992:1. Statistics Finland, Helsinki, p. 102. (In Finnish, summary in English).
13. Hukkinen, J. 1995. Corporatism as an impediment to ecological sustenance: The case of Finnish waste management. Ecol. Econ. 15, 59-75.
14. Hukkinen, J. 1995. Long-term environmental policy under corporatist institutions. Eur. Environ. 5, 98-105.
15. More on analysis of mental models, see a 1992 special issue of J. Mgmt Stud. 29, 261-389.
16. Pearl, J. 1988. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo.
17. Wilson, R. J. 1974. Introduction to Graph Theory. Academic Press, New York.
18. Koivukoski, E. 1992. Ongelmajätehuoltoa 10 vuotta (10 years of hazardous waste management). Mainos Wallin, Riihimäki. (In Finnish).
19. Agricultural Drainage and Salt Management in the San Joaquin Valley, Final Report. 1979. San Joaquin Valley Interagency Drainage Program, Fresno.
20. Developing Options, An Overview of Efforts to Solve Agricultural Drainage and Drainage-Related Problems in the San Joaquin Valley. 1987. San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program, Sacramento.
21. Comprehensive Plan for Water Resources Development: Central Valley Basin, California. 1945. Project Planning Report No. 2-4.0-3, November, US Bureau of Reclamation, Washington, DC.
22. The California Waler Plan. 1957. Bulletin No. 3, California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento.
23. San Joaquin Valley Drainage Advisory Group. 1969. Final Report. California Department of Water Resources, Fresno.
24. Agricultural Drainage and Salt Management in the San Joaquin Valley, Final Report. 1979. San Joaquin Valley Interagency Drainage Program, Fresno.
25. A Management Plan for Agricultural Subsurface Drainage and Related Problems on the Westside San Joaquin Valley. 1990. San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program, Sacramento.
26. Hukkinen, J. 1993. Bayesian analysis of agricultural drainage problems in California's San Joaquin valley. J. Environ. Mgmt 37, 183-200.
27. Hukkinen, J., Roe, E. and Rochlin, G. 1990. A salt on the land: A narrative analysis of the controversy over irrigation-related salinity and toxicity in California's San Joaquin valley. Policy Sci. 23, 307-329.
28. Preliminary Planning Alternatives for Solving Agricultural Drainage and Drainage-Related Problems in the San Joaquin Valley. 1989. San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program, Sacramento.
29. Hukkinen, J. 1991. Sociotechnical analysis of irrigation drainage in Central California. J. Water Res. Planning Mgmt, ASCE 117, 217-234.
30. Robinson, N.A. (ed.). 1993. Agenda 21: Earth's Action Plan. IUCN environmental policy & law paper no. 27. Oceana, New York.
31. Habermas, J. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Trans. T. McCarthy. Beacon Press, Boston.
32. Wilson, J.Q. and Rachal, P. 1977. Can the government regulate itself? The Public Interest, No. 46, Winter, 3-14.
33. Scott, W.R. 1987. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems, 2nd Ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
34. Churchman, C.W. 1983. The Systems Approach, Revised and Updated. Dell, New York.
35. Dovers, S.R. 1995. A framework for scaling and framing policy problems in sustainability. Ecol. Econ. 12, 93-106.
36. Wolf, S.A. and Allen, T.F.H. 1995. Recasting alternative agriculture as a management model: The value of adept scaling. Ecol. Econ. 12, 5-12.
37. Opschoor, H. and van der Straaten, J. 1993. Sustainable development: An institutional approach. Ecol. Econ. 7, 203-222.
38. Uusitalo, L. 1991. Suomalaiset ja ympäristö. Tutkimus taloudellisen käyttäytymisen rationaalisuudesta (Finns and the environment. A study of the rationality of economic behavior). Acta Academiae Oeconomicae Helsingiensis, A:49. The Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki. (In Finnish).
39. Constanza, R., Daly, H., Hawken, P. and Woodwell, J. 1995. Non-partisan ecological tax reform: A win-win proposal that is economically efficient, socially equitable, and ecologically sustainable. Int. Soc. Ecol. Econ. Newsl. 6, 3, 8.
40. March, J.G and Simon, H.A. 1994. Organizations, Second Edition. Blackwell, Cambridge.
41. The Economist. 1995. Climate change: Smoke. 8 April, 58.
42. The article is based on a paper presented at the International Workshop on Biodiversity Management: Theoretical and Methodological Problems at the Satakunta Environmental Research Centre in Port on 23-24 August 1995. I thank all the participants of the workshop and Chuck Dyke, Yrjö Haila, and two anonymous reviewers in particular for valuable comments on earlier versions of the article. Some of the arguments appear in a different form in my forthcoming book Institutions in Environmental Management. Routledge Ltd, London.
43. First submitted 25 January 1996. Accepted for publication after revision 4 February 1997.