Mixed-income developments and low rates of return: Insights from relocated public housing residents in Chicago

Housing Policy Debate

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 377-405

  Joseph, Mark L ^a   Chaskin, Robert J ^b  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

HOPE VI; Mobility; Public housing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868138538     PISSN: 10511482     EISSN: 2152050X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2012.680479     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bennett, Larry, Janet L. Smith, and Patricia A. Wright, eds. 2006. Where are poor people to live? Transforming public housing communities. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
2. Boyd, Melody. 2008. The role of social networks in making housing choices: The experience of the Gautreaux Two Resident Mobility Program. Cityscape 10, no. 1: 41-63.
3. Briggs, Xavier de Souza, Susan J. Popkin, and John Goering. 2010. Moving to opportunity: The story of an American experiment to fight Ghetto Poverty. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
4. Brooks, Fred, Carole Zugazaga, James Wolk, and Mary Ann Adams. 2005. Resident perceptions of housing, neighborhood, and economic conditions after relocation from public housing undergoing HOPE VI redevelopment. Journal of Research on Social Work Practice 16, no. 6: 481-90.
5. Brophy, Paul C., and Rhonda N. Smith. 1997. Mixed-income housing: Factors for success. Cityscape 3, no. 2: 3-31.
6. Buron, Larry, Susan Popkin, Diane Levy, Laura Harris, and Jill Khadduri. 2002. The HOPE VI resident tracking study: A snapshot of the current living situation of original residents from eight sites. A Report prepared by Abt. Associates, Inc. and the Urban Institute for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
7. Bushey, Claire. 2008. Housing agency struggles to speed up residents' return. Chi-Town Daily News, June 18. http://www.chitowndailynews.org/Chicago_news/Housing_agency_ struggles_to_speed_up_residents_return,14858. Accessed July 2, 2008.
8. Chaskin, Robert J., and Mark L. Joseph. 2010. Building community in mixed-income developments: Assumptions, approaches, and early experiences. Urban Affairs Review 45, no. 3: 299-335.
9. Chaskin, Robert J., and Mark L. Joseph. 2011. Relational expectations and emerging reality: the nature of social interaction in mixed-income developments. Journal of Urban Affairs. 32, no. 2: 209-37. Chaskin, Robert J., and Mark L. Joseph. Forthcoming. "Positive" gentrification, social inclusion, and the "right to the city" in mixed-income communities: Uses and expectations of space and place. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Chaskin, Robert J., Mark L. Joseph, Sara Voelker, and Amy Dworsky. Forthcoming. Public housing transformation and resident relocation: Comparing destinations and household characteristics in Chicago. Cityscape 14, no. 1: 183-214.
10. Chicago Housing Authority. 2007. FamilyWorks overview presentation. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Housing Authority.
11. Chicago Housing Authority. 2008. FY2009 moving to work annual plan: Plan for transformation year 10. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Housing Authority.
12. Chicago Housing Authority. 2009. CHA's response to BPI's mid-course report on Chicago's plan for transformation. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Housing Authority.
13. Chicago Housing Authority. 2010. FY2009 moving to work annual report: Plan for transformation year 10. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Housing Authority.
14. Chicago Housing Authority. 2011. The plan for transformation: An update on relocation. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Housing Authority.
15. Cisneros, Henry G., and Lora Engdahl, eds. 2009. From despair to hope: Hope VI and the new promise of public housing in America's cities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
16. Clampet-Lundquist, Susan. 2004. HOPE VI relocation: Moving to new neighborhoods and building new ties. Housing Policy Debate 15, no. 2: 415-47.
17. Comey, Jennifer. 2007. Hope VI'ed and on the move. Brief No. 1. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
18. Cunningham, Mary K., Susan J. Popkin, and Martha R. Burt. 2005. Public housing transformation and the hard to house. Brief. No. 9. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
19. Dobies, Kathryn L. 2008. Agencies scramble to help evicted tenants. Medill Reports, August 27. http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/govt/story.aspx?id=156895. Accessed February 22, 2010.
20. Dobies, Kathryn L., and Erin Halasz. 2008. Renters face eviction, betrayal in landlord foreclosure. Medill Reports, August 27. http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/ govt/story.aspx?id=156898. Accessed February 22, 2010.
21. Fraser, James C., and Edward L. Kick. 2007. The role of public, private, non-profit and community sectors in shaping mixed-income housing outcomes in the U.S. Urban Studies 44, no. 12: 2357-77.
22. Gibson, Karen J. 2007. The relocation of the Columbia Villa community: Views from the residents. Journal of Planning Education and Research 27, no. 1: 5-19.
23. Goetz, Edward G. 2003. Clearing the way: Deconcentrating the poor in urban America. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
24. Goetz, Edward G. 2010. Better neighborhoods, better outcomes? Explaining relocation outcomes in HOPE VI. Cityscape 12, no. 1: 5-32.
25. Illinois Assisted Housing Action Research Project. 2010. Are we home yet? Creating real choice for housing choice voucher families in Chicago. http://www.housingactionil.org/downloads/IHARP_HCV_Report_2010.pdf. Accessed February 22, 2010.
26. Imbroscio, David. 2008. '[U]nited and Actuated by Some Common Impulse of Passion': Challenging the dispersal consensus in American housing policy research. Journal of Urban Affairs 30, no. 2: 111-30.
27. Joseph, Mark. 2006. Is mixed-income development an antidote to urban poverty? Housing Policy Debate 17, no. 2: 209-34.
28. Joseph, Mark. 2008. Early resident experiences at a new mixed-income development in Chicago. Journal of Urban Affairs 30, no. 3: 229-57.
29. Joseph, Mark. 2010. Creating mixed-income developments in Chicago: Developer and service provider perspectives. Housing Policy Debate 20, no. 1: 88-115.
30. Joseph, Mark L., and Robert J. Chaskin. 2010. Living in a mixed-income development: Resident perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of two developments in Chicago. Urban Studies. 47, no. 11: 2347-66.
31. Joseph, Mark L., Robert J. Chaskin, and Henry S. Webber. 2007. The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Review 42, no. 3: 369-409.
32. Kingsley, G. Thomas, Jennifer Johnson, and Kathryn L.S. Pettit. 2003. Patterns of section 8 relocation in the Hope VI program. Journal of Urban Affairs 25, no. 4: 427-47.
33. Kleit, Rachel G. 2005. HOPE VI new communities: Neighborhood relationships in mixedincome housing. Environment and Planning A 37, no. 8: 1413-41.
34. Kleit, Rachel G., and Lynn C. Manzo. 2004. To move or not to move: Relationships to place and relocation choices in HOPE VI. Housing Policy Debate 17, no. 2: 271-308.
35. Kleit, Rachel G., and Martha Galvez. 2011. The location choices of public housing residents displaced by redevelopment: Market constraints, personal preferences, or social information? Journal of Urban Affairs 33, no. 4: 375-407,
36. Levy, Diane, and Megan Gallagher. 2006. HOPE VI and neighborhood revitalization. Final report. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
37. Manzo, Lynne C., Rachel G. Kleit, and Dawn Couch. 2008. Moving three times is like having your house on fire once: The experience of place and impending displacement among public housing residents. Urban Studies 45, no. 9: 1855-78.
38. Marquis, Gerald P., and Soumen Ghosh. 2008. Housing opportunities for people everywhere (HOPE VI): Who gets back in? The Social Science Journal 45: 401-18.
39. Metropolitan Planning Council. 2003. CHA plan for transformation July 2003 progress report. Chicago, IL: Metropolitan Planning Council.
40. Olivo, Antonio. 2005a. Rules leave new CHA homes empty: Strict guidelines draw criticism. Chicago Tribune, February 16, p. 3.
41. Olivo, Antonio. 2005b. Report hits CHA for losing residents: Many former tenants are now off the books. Chicago Tribune, July 22, p.1.
42. Pattillo, Mary. 2007. Black on the block: The politics of race and class in the city. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
43. Pattillo, Mary. 2009. Investing in poor, black neighborhoods "as is. " In Public housing and the legacy of segregation, eds. Margery A. Turner, Susan J. Popkin, and Lynette Rawlins, 31-46. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
44. Polikoff, Alex, E. Hoy McConnell II, Julie Elena Brown, Katie Hill, Kate Pomper, Nadia Underhill, Roseann Aviles, Kelli Harsch, Peter Shaw, and Jessica Falk. 2009. The third side: A mid-course report on Chicago's transformation of public housing. Chicago, IL: Business and Professional People for the Public Interest.
45. Popkin, Susan J. 2007. Testimony before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Housing, Transportation, and Community Development, and the U.S. House Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity. http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/901088_HOPE_VI.pdf. Accessed July 25, 1007.
46. Popkin, Susan J., Bruce Katz, Mary Cunningham, Karen D. Brown, Jeremy Gustafson, and Margery Turner. 2004. A decade of Hope VI: Research findings and policy challenges. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute and The Brookings Institution.
47. Popkin, Susan J., Diane K. Levy, and Larry Buron. 2009. Has HOPE VI transformed residents' lives? New evidence from the HOPE VI panel study. Housing Studies 24, no. 4: 477-502.
48. Popkin, Susan J., Diane K. Levy, and Larry Buron. 2010. A glass half-empty? New evidence from the HOPE VI panel study. Housing Policy Debate 20, no. 1: 43-63.
49. Rogal, Brian J. 2005. Uncertain prospects: Displaced Chicago housing authority tenants wonder if they will qualify to return to rebuilt public housing. Chicago Reporter, March 1. http://www.chicagoreporter.com/index.php/c/Inside_Stories/d/Uncertain_Prospects. Accessed December 2, 2009.
50. Smith, Alistair. 2002. Mixed-income housing developments: Promise and reality. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University.
51. Smith, Robin E., Arthur Naparstek, Susan Popkin, Lesley Bartlett, Lisa Bates, Jessica Cigna, Russell Crane, and Elisa Vinson. 2002. Housing choice for HOPE VI relocatees: Final report. Prepared for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
52. Snyderman, Robin, and Steven D. Dailey II. 2000. Public housing in the public interest. Chicago housing authority transformation plan update October 2000 MPC fact sheet #1. Chicago, IL: Metropolitan Planning Council.
53. Vale, Lawrence J. 1997. Empathological places: Residents' ambivalence toward remaining in public housing. Journal of Planning Education and Research 16, no. 3: 159-75.
54. Venkatesh, Sudhir. 2002. The Robert Taylor homes relocation study. New York, NY: Center for Urban Research and Policy, Columbia University.
55. Venkatesh, Sudhir, and Isil Celimli. 2004. Tearing down the community. Shelterforce Online, Issue 138. http://www.nhi.org/online/issues/138/chicago.html. Accessed June 30, 2007.
56. Wilen, William P. 2006. The Horner model: Successfully redeveloping public housing. Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy 1, no. 1: 62-95.
57. Williams, Kale, Paul Fischer, and Mary Ann Russ. 2003. Temporary relocation, permanent choice: serving families with rent vouchers during the Chicago housing authority plan for transformation. Chicago, IL: Metropolitan Planning Council.