To move or not to move: Relationships to place and relocation choices in HOPE VI

Housing Policy Debate

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 271-308

  Kleit, Rachel Garshick ^a   Manzo, Lynne C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Community development and revitalization; Low income housing; Mobility

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750455130     PISSN: 10511482     EISSN: 10511482     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2006.9521571     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abt Associates, Inc. 1996. An Historical and Baseline Assessment of HOPE VI. Vol. I. Cross-Site Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
2. Altman, Irwin, and Setha Low. 1992. Place Attachment. Human Behavior and Environments: Advances in Theory and Research Series, No. 12. New York: Plenum.
3. Amerigo, Maria, and Juan Ignacio Aragones. 1990. Residential Satisfaction in Council Housing. Journal of Environmental Psychology 10:313-25.
4. Brown, Barbara B., and Douglas D. Perkins. 1992. Disruptions in Place Attachment. In Place Attachment, Human Behavior and Environments: Advances in Theory and Research Series, No. 12, ed. Irwin Altman and Setha Low, 279-307. New York: Plenum.
5. Bruin, Marilyn J., and Christine C. Cook. 1997. Understanding Constraints and Residential Satisfaction among Low-Income Single-Parent Families. Environment and Behavior 29(4):532-53.
6. Buron, Larry, Susan J. Popkin, Diane Levy, Laura E. Harris, and Jill Khadduri. 2002. The HOPE VI Resident Tracking Study: A Snapshot of the Current Living Situation of Original Residents from Eight Sites. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
7. Cunningham, Mary K., and Susan J. Popkin (with Erin B. Godfrey and Beata A. Bednarz). 2002. CHA Relocation Counseling Assessment Final Report. Urban Institute No. 07011-000-05. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
8. Freeman, Lance. 1998. Interpreting the Dynamics of Public Housing: Cultural and Rational Choice Explanations. Housing Policy Debate 9(2):323-53.
9. Fried, Marc. 1966. Grieving for a Lost Home: Psychological Costs of Relocation. In Urban Renewal. The Record and the Controversy, ed. James Q. Wilson, 359-79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Fried, Marc. 2000. Continuities and Discontinuities of Place. Journal of Environmental Psychology 20(3):193-205.
11. Giuliani, M. Vittoria, and Roberta Feldman. 1993. Place Attachment in a Developmental and Cultural Context. Journal of Environmental Psychology 13:267-74.
12. Goetz, Edward G. 2003. Clearing the Way: Deconcentrating the Poor in Urban America. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
13. Kingsley, George T., Jennifer Johnson, and Kathryn L. S. Pettit. 2003. Patterns of Section 8 Relocation in the HOPE VI Program. Journal of Urban Affairs 25(4):427-47.
14. Kleit, Rachel Garshick. 2001. Neighborhood Relations in Scattered-Site and Clustered Public Housing. Journal of Urban Affairs 23(4-5):409-30.
15. Kleit, Rachel Garshick, and Jennifer Allison. 2002. HOPE VI for High Point: Baseline Report. Report to the Seattle Housing Authority. Seattle: University of Washington, Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs. World Wide Web page (accessed June 24, 2006).
16. Kleit, Rachel Garshick, Sheri Reder, and Allegra Abramo. 2004. HOPE VI for High Point Interim Report: Panel Study Baseline and Initial Relocation Outcomes. Report to the Seatle Housing Authority. Seattle: University of Washington, Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs. World Wide Web page (accessed June 24, 2006).
17. Kuha, Jouni. 2004. AIC and BIC: Comparisons of Assumptions and Performance. Sociological Methods and Research 33(2):188-229.
18. Lee, Barrett A., R. S. Oropesa, and James Kanan. 1994. Neighborhood Context in Residential Mobility. Demography 31(2):249-70.
19. Manzo, Lynne C. 2003. Beyond Home and Haven: Toward a Reconceptualization of Place Attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23(1):46-61.
20. Manzo, Lynne C. 2005. For Better or Worse: Exploring Multiple Dimensions of Place. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25(1):67-85.
21. McCarty, Maggie. 2005. HOPE VI: Background, Funding, and Issues. Order Code RL32236. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service.
22. Michelson, William. 1977. Environmental Choice, Human Behavior, and Residential Satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Morris, Earl W, Sue R. Crull, and Mary Winter. 1976. Housing Norms, Housing Satisfaction, and the Propensity to Move. Journal of Marriage and the Family 38:309-20.
24. National Housing Law Project, Poverty and Race Research Action Council, Sherwood Research Associates, and Everywhere and Now Public Housing Residents Organizing Nationally Together (ENPHRONT). 2002. False HOPE: A Critical Assessment of the HOPE VI Public Housing Redevelopment Program. Oakland, CA: National Housing Law Project.
25. Popkin, Susan J., Mary K. Cunningham, and Martha Burt. 2005. Public Housing Transformation and the Hard-to-House. Housing Policy Debate 16(1):1-24.
26. Popkin, Susan J., Bruce Katz, Mary K. Cunningham, Karen D. Brown, Jeremy Gustafson, and Margery Austin Turner. 2004. A Decade of HOPE VI: Research Findings and Policy Challenges. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
27. Popkin, Susan J., Diane K. Levy, Laura E. Harris, Jennifer Comey, Mary K. Cunningham, and Larry F. Buron. 2002. HOPE VI Panel Study: Baseline Report. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
28. Rossi, Peter H. 1955. Why Families Move. Glencoe, IL: Free.
29. Salama, Jerry J. 1999. The Redevelopment of Distressed Public Housing: Early Results from HOPE VI Projects in Atlanta, Chicago, and San Antonio. Housing Policy Debate 10(1): 95-142.
30. Seattle Housing Authority. 2003. Re-Occupancy Meeting Minutes. Unpublished paper.
31. Seattle Housing Authority. 2005. Development: High Point Redevelopment Plan. World Wide Web page (last modified June 23).
32. Seattle Housing Authority, Mithun, Streeter & Associates, SvR Design Company, and Nakano Associates. 2002. High Point HOPE VI Redevelopment Master Plan, Prepared for the Seattle Design Commission. Seattle: Seattle Housing Authority.
33. Smith, Robin E. (with Arthur Naparstek, Susan Popkin, Lesley Bartlett, Lisa Bates, Jessica Cigna, Russell Crane, and Elisa Vinson). 2002. Housing Choice for HOPE VI Relocatees. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, Metropolitan Housing and Communities Policy Center.
34. Speare, Alden. 1974. Residential Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable in Residential Mobility. Demography 11(2):173-88.
35. Speare, Alden Jr., Sidney Goldstein, and William H. Frey. 1975. Residential Mobility, Migration, and Metropolitan Change. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
36. Stokols, Daniel, and Sally A. Shumaker. 1981. People in Places: A Transactional View of Settings. In Cognition, Social Behavior, and the Environment, ed. John H. Harvey, 441-88. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Tuan, Yi-Fu. 1974. Topophilia. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
38. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2003a. HOPE VI Program Authority and Funding History. World Wide Web page (accessed June 11).
39. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2003b. A Picture of Subsidized Households - 1998. World Wide Web page (accessed February 14, 2005).
40. Vale, Lawrence J. 1997. Empathological Places: Residents' Ambivalence toward Remaining in Public Housing. Journal of Planning Education and Research 16:159-75.
41. Vale, Lawrence J. 2002. Reclaiming Public Housing: A Half Century of Struggle in Three Public Neighborhoods. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Varady, David P., and Carole C. Walker. 2000. Vouchering Out Distressed Subsidized Developments: Does Moving Lead to Improvements in Housing and Neighborhood Conditions? Housing Policy Debate 11(1):115-62.
43. Varady, David P., and Xinhao Wang. 2001. Can Public Housing Authorities Attract and Hold Upwardly Mobile Households? A Report from Cincinnati. Journal of Urban Affairs 23(3-4):431-50.
44. Zielenbach, Sean. 2003a. Catalyzing Community Development: HOPE VI and Neighborhood Revitalization. Journal of Affordable Housing 13(2):40-80.
45. Zielenbach, Sean. 2003b. The Economic Impacts of HOPE VI on Neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Housing Research Foundation.