The role of public, private, non-profit and community sectors in shaping mixed-income housing outcomes in the US

Urban Studies

Volumn 44, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 2357-2377

  Fraser, James C ^a   Kick, Edward L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; HOUSING CONDITIONS; HOUSING MARKET; INCOME DISTRIBUTION; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; NEIGHBORHOOD; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP; THEORETICAL STUDY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 35649028390     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00420980701540952     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Associated Press (2000) Durham receives $35 million grant to refurbish public housing. Newswires
2. Bloom, H. S., Riccio, J. A., Verma, N. and Walter, J. (2005) Promoting Work in Public Housing: The Effectiveness of Jobs-Plus, MDRC Publications, New York
3. Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. (2002) Cities and the geographies of 'actually existing neoliberalism'. Antipode, 34:3, pp. 349-379.
4. Brophy, P. C. and Burnett, K. (2003) Building a new framework for community development in weak-market cities
5. Brophy, P. C. and Smith, R. N. (1997) Mixed-income housing: Factors for success. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 3:2, pp. 3-31.
6. Chattanooga Housing Authority, Chattanooga Neighborhood Enterprises, Regional Planning Agency and Rivercity Company (1997) Southside redevelopment plan (amendment to the downtown areas improvement plan)
7. Clark, S. L. (2002) Where the poor live: How federal housing policy shapes residential communities. Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development, 31:1, pp. 69-79.
8. Coleman, J. (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, pp. 95-120.
9. Collins, M. E., Curley, A. M., Clay, C. and Lara, R. (2005) Evaluation of social services in a HOPE VI housing development: Resident and staff perceptions of success and barriers. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28, pp. 47-59.
10. Coulton, C., Chow, J., Wang, E. and Su, M. (1996) Geographic concentration of affluence and poverty in 100 metropolitan areas. Urban Affairs Review, 32, pp. 186-216.
11. Durham Housing Authority and The Community Builders (2000) Hope VI application, Durham Housing Authority, Durham, NC
12. Durham Planning Department (2003) Subsidized housing location policy report, City and County of Durham Planning Department, Durham, NC
13. Ellen, I. G. and Turner, M. A. (1997) Does neighborhood matter? Assessing resident evidence. Housing Policy Debate, 8:4, pp. 833-866.
14. Elwood, S. (2002) GIS and collaborative urban governance: Understanding their implications for community action and power. Urban Geography, 22:8, pp. 737-759.
15. FFIEC (Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council) (2005) Home Mortgage Disclosure Act statistics 1998-2004.
16. Finkel, A., Lennon, K. and Eisenstadt, E. (2000) HOPE VI: A promising vintage. Policy Studies Review, 17:23, pp. 104-119.
17. Fraser, J. (2004) Beyond gentrification: Mobilizing communities and claiming space. Urban Geography, 25:5, pp. 437-457.
18. Fraser, J. and Kick, E. (2005) Understanding community building in urban America: Transforming neighborhood identity. The Journal of Poverty, 9:1, pp. 23-44.
19. Fraser, J., Lepofsky, J., Kick, E. and Williams, J. P. (2003) The construction of the local and the limits of contemporary community-building in the United States. Urban Affairs Review, 38:3, pp. 417-445.
20. Fraser, J., Rohe, W. and Warren, C. (2005) Few Gardens Hope VI evaluation: Community and social service provision, The Center for Urban and Regional Studies, Chapel Hill, NC
21. Fraser, J., van Zandt, S., Rohe, W. and Warren, C. (2004) Impacts of relocation on former residents of Few Gardens: Neighborhood quality, Chapel Hill, NC
22. GAO (US General Accounting Office) (2003) Public housing: HOPE VI resident issues and changes in neighborhoods surrounding grant sites, US General Accounting Office, Washington, DC
23. Goetz, E. G. (2005) Comment: Public housing demolition and the benefits to low income families. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71:4, pp. 407-410.
24. Greenbaum, S. (2002) Social capital and deconcentration: Theoretical and policy paradoxes of the HOPE VI program. North American Dialogue, 5:1, pp. 9-13.
25. Harris, L. E. and Kaye, D. R. (2004) How are HOPE VI families faring? Health, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC
26. Harvey, D. (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler B, 71, pp. 3-17.
27. (2004) The Herald-Sun, Durham, NC
28. HUD (US Department of Housing and Urban Development) (2000) Community and supportive services for original residents: General guidance for the HOPE VI program (draft), US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC
29. Icon Architecture, New Synergy, Inc. and J. Davis Architects (2002) Durham HOPE VI Neighborhood Revitalization, Durham Housing Authority and The Community Builders, Durham, NC
30. Jencks, C. and Mayer, S. (1990) The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. Inner-city Poverty in the United States, pp. 111-186. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
31. Jessop, B. (2002) Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A state-theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34:3, pp. 453-472.
32. Joseph, M. L., Chaskin, R. J. and Webber, H. S. (2007) The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Review, 42:3, pp. 369-409.
33. Kleit, R. (2001) The role of neighborhood social networks in scattered site public housing residents' search for jobs. Housing Policy Debate, 12:3, pp. 541-573.
34. Land, K. C., McCall, P. L. and Cohen, L. E. (1991) Characteristics of US cities with extreme (high or low) crime rates: Results of discriminant analyses of 1960, 1970 and 1980 data. Social Indicators Research, 24, pp. 209-231.
35. Levy, D. K. and Kaye, D. R. (2004) How are HOPE VI families faring? Income and employment, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC
36. Levy, D. K., Comey, J. and Padilla, S. (2005) In the face of gentrification: Local case studies to mitigate displacement, The Urban Institute, Metropolitan Housing and Communities Policy Center, Washington, DC
37. Logan, J. and Molotch, H. (1987) Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
38. MacLeod, G. (2002) From urban entrepreneurialism to a 'revanchist city'? On the spatial injustices of Glasgow's renaissance. Antipode, 34:3, pp. 602-624.
39. Mallach, A. (2001) Comment: A new paradigm-full of pluses and minuses. Bright Ideas, 20:3, pp. 39-41.
40. Morgen, S. and Maskovsky, J. (2003) The anthropology of welfare 'reform': New perspectives on US urban poverty in the post-welfare era. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, pp. 315-338.
41. (1998) The News and Observer, p. A1. Raleigh, NC
42. (2003) The News and Observer, p. B3. Raleigh, NC
43. (2003) Hope in Durham. The News and Observer, p. B1.
44. (2004) Federal audit rips Durham. The News and Observer, NC
45. (2005) Durham grant study: Housing lags spending. The News and Observer, p. B1.
46. (2005) 3 on list for job in Durham. The News and Observer, p. B1.
47. Peck, J. and Tickell, A. (2002) Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34:3, pp. 380-404.
48. Popkin, S. J., Buron, L., Levy, D. K. and Cunningham, M. K. (2000) The Gautreaux legacy: What might mixed-income and dispersal strategies mean for the poorest public housing tenants. Housing Policy Debate, 11:4, pp. 911-942.
49. Popkin, S. J., Cunningham, M. K. and Burt, M. (2005) Public housing transformation and the hard-to-house. Housing Policy Debate, 16:1, pp. 1-24.
50. Popkin, S. J., Katz, B. and Cunningham, M. K. (2004) A decade of HOPE VI: Research findings and policy challenges, The Urban Institute and Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
51. Popkin, S. J., Levy, D. K. and Harris, L. E. (2002) HOPE VI panel study: baseline report, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC
52. Porter, M. E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press, New York
53. Porter, M. E. (1995) The competitive advantage of the inner city. Harvard Business Review, pp. 55-71.
54. Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon and Schuster, New York
55. Quercia, R. G. and Galster, G. C. (1997) Threshold effects and the expected benefits of attracting middle-income households to the central city. Housing Policy Debate, 8:2, pp. 409-436.
56. RiverCity Company (1997) Southside Redevelopment Plan.
57. Salama, J. J. (1999) The redevelopment of distressed public housing: early results from HOPE VI projects in Atlanta, Chicago, and San Antonio. Housing Policy Debate, 10:1, pp. 95-142.
58. Schubert, M. (2000) Neighborhood revitalization strategy, Lyndhurst Foundation, Chattanooga, TN
59. Schubert, M. (2001) Revitalizing the smart growth debate-revisited. Bright Ideas, 20:3, pp. 37-38.
60. SETNIS (2003) Report prepared for the Lyndhurst Foundation. Neighborhood analysis, Chattanooga, TN
61. Skalski, G. (2005) Housing agency cuts 27 spots. Durham Herald Sun, p. C1.
62. Slater, T., Curran, W. and Lees, L. (2004) Gentrification research: New directions and critical scholarship. Environment and Planning A, 36, pp. 1141-1150.
63. Smith, A. (2002) Mixed-income housing developments: Promise and reality, Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University and Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, Cambridge, MA
64. Smith, N. (2002) New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode, 34:3, pp. 327-350.
65. Turnham, J. and Bonjorni, J. (2004) Review of neighborhood revitalization initiatives, Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, Washington, DC
66. US Bureau of the Census (2000) American fact finder data sets, 2000 decennial census: Summary file (SF) 4 (.
67. Varady, D. P., Raffel, J. A., Sweeney, S. and Denson, L. (2005) Attracting middle-income families in the HOPE VI public housing revitalization program. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27:2, pp. 149-164.
68. Weber, R. (2002) Extracting value from the city: Neoliberalism and urban redevelopment. Antipode, 34:3, pp. 519-540.
69. Wexler, H. J. (2001)THOPE VI: Market means/public ends: the goals, strategies, and midterm lessons of HUD's urban revitalization demonstration program. Journal of Affordable Housing, 10:3, pp. 195-233.
70. Whitzman, C. and Slater, T. (2006) Village ghetto land. Urban Affairs Review, 41:5, pp. 673-696.
71. Wilkins, C. S. (2002) Barriers to creating and sustaining mixed income communities.. and how to overcome the barriers (discussion draft), Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, Washington, DC
72. Wilson, W. J. (1987) The Truly Disadvantaged, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
73. Wilson, W. J. (1996) When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor, Vintage Books, New York
74. Zielenbach, S. (2003) The Economic Impact of HOPE VI on Neighborhoods, Housing Research Foundation, Washington, DC