Social interaction in mixed-income developments: Relational expectations and emerging reality

Journal of Urban Affairs

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 209-237

  Chaskin, Robert J ^a   Joseph, Mark L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOUSING; INCOME; POVERTY; URBAN AREA; URBAN SOCIETY;

CHICAGO; ILLINOIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79954997171     PISSN: 07352166     EISSN: 14679906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00537.x     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Anderson, E. (1990). Streetwise. Chicago The University of Chicago Press.
2. Arthurson, K. (2002). Creating inclusive communities through balancing social mix: A critical relationship or tenuous link Urban Policy and Research, 20(3), 245-261.
3. Atkinson, R., & Kintrea, K. (2000). Owner-occupation, social mix, and neighbourhood impacts. Policy and Politics, 28(1), 93-108.
4. August, M. (2008). Social mix and Canadian public housing redevelopment: Experiences in Toronto. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 17(1), 82-100.
5. Bailey, N., Haworth, A., Manzi, T., Paranagamage, P., & Roberts, M. (2006). Creating and sustaining mixed income communities. Coventry, UK Chartered Institute of Housing/Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
6. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice-Hall.
7. Berube, A. (2005). Mixed communities in England: A U.S. perspective on evidence and policy prospects. York, UK Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
8. Bowly, D. (1978). The poorhouse: Subsidized housing in Chicago, 1895-1976. Carbondale Southern Illinois University Press.
9. Briggs, X. (1998). Brown kids in white suburbs: Housing mobility and the many faces of social capital. Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), 177-221.
10. Brophy, P., & Smith, R. (1997). Mixed-income housing: Factors for success. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy and Development Research, 3(2), 3-31.
11. Buron, L., Popkin, S., Levy, D., Harris, L., & Khadduri, J. (2002). The HOPE VI resident tracking study: A snapshot of the current living situation of original residents from eight sites. A report prepared by Abt Associates, Inc. and the Urban Institute for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Washington, DC The Urban Institute .
12. Chaskin, R. J., & Joseph, M. L. (2010a). Building "community" in mixed-income developments: Assumptions, approaches and early experiences. Urban Affairs Review, 45(3), 299-335.
13. Chaskin, R. J., & Joseph, M. L. (2010b, March). Social norms and social control: Uses and expectations of space and place in mixed-income public housing developments. Paper presented at the Urban Affairs Association meeting, Honolulu, Hawaii .
14. Chicago Housing Authority (2008). FY2008 moving to work annual plan: Plan for transformation year 9. Chicago Chicago Housing Authority.
15. Chicago Housing Authority (2009). The plan for transformation overview: Goals and progress of the plan. The plan for transformation at 10: The symposium. Chicago Chicago Housing Authority.
16. Chicago Housing Authority (2010). FY 2009 moving to work annual report: Plan for transformation year 10. Chicago Chicago Housing Authority.
17. Cisneros, H. G., & Engdahl, L. (2009). From despair to hope: Hope VI and the new promise of public housing in America's Cities. Washington, DC The Brookings Institution.
18. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Summer), 95-120.
19. Cove, E., Turner, M. A., Briggs, X., & Duarte, C. (2008). Can escaping from poor neighborhoods increase employment and earnings? Washington, DC The Urban Institute.
20. Daly, M., & Silver, H. (2008). Social exclusion and social capital: A comparison and critique. Theory and Society, 37(6), 537-566.
21. DeLuca, S. (2005). The continuing relevance of the Gautreaux program for housing mobility: Recent evidence. In P. Tegeler, M. Cunningham, & M. A. Turner (Eds.), Keeping the promise: Preserving and enhancing housing mobility in the section 8 housing choice voucher program (pp. 25-42). Washington, DC Poverty & Race Research Action Council.
22. Drake, S., & Cayton, H. R. (1945). Black metropolis: A study of negro life in a northern city. Chicago The University of Chicago Press.
23. Duneier, M. (1992). Slim's table: Race, respectability, and masculinity. Chicago The University of Chicago Press.
24. Elliott, J. R. (1999). Social isolation and labor market insulation: Network and neighborhood effects on less-educated urban workers. The Sociological Quarterly, 40(2), 199-216.
25. Fraser, J. C., & Kick, E. L. (2007). The role of public, private, non-profit and community sectors in shaping mixed-income housing outcomes in the US. Urban Studies, 44(12), 2357-2377.
26. Freeman, L. (2006). There goes the 'hood: Views of gentrification from the ground up. Philadelphia Temple University Press.
27. Freudenburg, W. R. (1986). The density of acquaintanceship: An overlooked variable in community research American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 27-63.
28. Furstenberg, F. (1993). How families manage risk and opportunity in dangerous neighborhoods. In W. J. Wilson (Ed.), Sociology and the public agenda (pp. 231-258). Newbury Park, CA Sage Publications.
29. Gittell, R., & Vidal, A. (1998). Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications.
30. Goering, J., & Feins, J. (2003). Choosing a better life? Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity social experiment. Washington, D.C .: The Urban Institute Press.
31. Goetz, E. G. (2003). Housing dispersal programs. Journal of Planning Literature, 18(1), 3-16.
32. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
33. Graves, E. M. (2010). The structuring of urban life in a mixed-income housing "community." City and Community, 9(1), 109-131.
34. Hogan, J. (1996). Scattered-site housing: Characteristics and consequences. Seattle, Washington Prepared for The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
35. Hyra, D. (2008). The new urban renewal: The economic transformation of Harlem and Bronzeville. Chicago University of Chicago Press.
36. Imbroscio, D. (2008). [U]nited and actuated by some common impulse of passion. Journal of Urban Affairs, 30(2), 111-130.
37. Joseph, M. L. (2008). Early resident experiences at a new mixed-income development in Chicago. Journal of Urban Affairs, 30(3), 229-257.
38. Joseph, M. L. (2010). Creating mixed-income developments in Chicago: Developer and service provider perspectives. Housing Policy Debate, 20(1), 91-118.
39. Joseph, M. L., & Chaskin, R. J. (2010). Life in a mixed-income development: Resident perceptions at two developments in Chicago. Urban Studies, 47(11), 2347-2366.
40. Joseph, M. L., Chaskin, R. J., & Webber, H. S. (2007). The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Review, 42(1), 369-409.
41. Kasarda, J. D. (1990). City jobs and residents on a collision course: The urban underclass dilemma. Economic Development Quarterly, 4(4), 313-319.
42. Katz, M. B. (1993). The underclass debate. Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press.
43. Kleit, R. G. (2001). The role of neighborhood social networks in scattered-site public housing residents' search for jobs. Housing Policy Debate, 12(3), 541-573.
44. Kleit, R. G. (2002). Job search networks and strategies in scattered-site public housing. Housing Studies, 17(1), 83-100.
45. Kleit, R. G. (2005). HOPE VI new communities: Neighborhood relationships in mixed-income housing. Environment and Planning A, 37(8), 1413-1441.
46. Kling, J., Liebman, J., Katz, L., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2004). Moving to opportunity and tranquillity: Neighborhood effects on adult economic self-sufficiency and health from a randomized housing voucher experiment. Working Paper #481, Industrial Relations Section, Princeton University .
47. Lewis, O. (1966). La vida: A Puerto Rican family in the culture of poverty. New York Random House.
48. Lin, N., & Dumin, M. (1986). Access to occupations through social ties. Social Networks, 8, 365-385.
49. Lin, N., Vaughn, J. C., & Ensel, W. M. (1981). Social resources and occupational attainment. Social Forces, 59(4), 1164-1181.
50. Mendenhall, R. (2004, October). Pathways to economic independence: Qualitative results from the Gautreaux residential mobility program. Paper presented at the Association of Public Policy Analysis and Management Conference, Atlanta, GA .
51. Metropolitan Planning Council (2005). CHA plan for transformation July 2005 update. Chicago Metropolitan Planning Council.
52. Murray, C. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy 1950-1980. New York Basic Books.
53. Musterd S., & Andersson, R. (2005). Housing mix, social mix and social opportunities. Urban Affairs Review, 40, 761-790.
54. Newman, K. S. (1999). No shame in my game: The working poor and the inner city. New York Knopf & Russell Sage Foundation.
55. Pattillo, M. (2008). Black on the block: The politics of race and class in the city. Chicago The University of Chicago Press.
56. Pattillo, M. (2009). Investing in poor and black neighborhoods "as is". In M. A. Turner, S. J. Popkin, & L. Rawlings (Eds.), Public housing transformation: Confronting the legacy of segregation (pp. 47-68). Washington DC Urban Institute Press.
57. Polikoff, A. (2006). Waiting for Gautreaux: A story of segregation, housing and the black ghetto. Evanston, IL Northwestern University Press.
58. Popkin, S. J. (2007). Testimony before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Housing, Transportation, and Community Development, and the U.S. House Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity. .
59. Popkin, S. J., Harris, L. E., & Cunningham, M. K. (2002). Families in transition: A qualitative analysis of the MTO experience. Final report to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research. Washington, DC The Urban Institute .
60. Popkin, S. J., Katz, B., Cunningham, M., Brown, K. D., Gustafson, J., & Turner, M. (2004). A decade of Hope VI: Research findings and policy challenges. Washington, DC The Urban Institute and The Brookings Institution.
61. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The revival of American community. New York Simon and Schuster.
62. Rankin, B. H., & Quane, J. M. (2002). Social contexts and urban adolescent outcomes: The interrelated effects of neighborhoods, families, and peers on African-American youth. Social Problems, 49(1), 79-100.
63. Rosenbaum, J. E., Stroh, L. K., & Flynn, C. (1998). Lake Parc Place: A study of mixed-income housing. Housing Policy Debate, 9(4), 703-740.
64. Rubinowitz, L. S., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2000). Crossing the class and color lines: From public housing to white suburbia. Chicago The University of Chicago Press.
65. Ruming, K. J., Mee, K. J., & McGuirk, P. M. (2004). Questioning the rhetoric of social mix: Courteous community or hidden hostility Australian Geographical Studies, 42(2), 234-248.
66. Sampson, R. J. (1999). What "community" supplies. In R. F. Ferguson & W. T. Dickens (Eds.), Urban problems and community development (pp. 241-292). Washington, DC The Brookings Institution Press.
67. Sampson, R. J., & Groves, B. W. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774-802.
68. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Earls, F. 1999. Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633-660.
69. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing neighborhood effects: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443-478.
70. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
71. Sard, B., & Staub, L. (2008). House bill makes significant improvements in "HOPE VI" Public housing revitalization program: Provisions to overcome employment barriers need strengthening. Washington, DC Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
72. Small, M. L., & Newman, K. (2001). Urban poverty after The Truly Disadvantaged: The rediscovery of the family, the neighborhood, and culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 23-45.
73. Smith, J. J., & Stovall, D. (2008). "Coming home" to new homes and new schools: Critical race theory and the new politics of containment. Journal of Education Policy, 23(2), 135-152.
74. Stack, C. B. (1974). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York Harper.
75. Stoloff, J. A., Glanville, J. L., & Bienenstock, E. J. (1999). Women's participation in the labor force: The role of social networks. Social Networks, 21, 91-108.
76. Suttles, G. D. (1972). The social construction of communities. Chicago The University of Chicago Press.
77. Tach, L. (2009). More than bricks and mortar: Neighborhood frames, social processes, and the mixed-income redevelopment of a public housing project. City and Community, 8(3), 273-303.
78. Talen, E. (2002). The social goals of New Urbanism. Housing Policy Debate, 13(1), 165-188.
79. Valentine, C. A. (1968). Culture and poverty: Critique and counter proposals. Chicago The University of Chicago Press.
80. Varady, D., & Walker, C. (2003). Housing vouchers and residential mobility. Journal of Planning Literature, 18(1), 17-30.
81. Wellman, B. (1979). The community question: The intimate networks of East New Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology, 85(5), 1201-1231.
82. Wilen, W. P. (2006). The Horner model: Successfully redeveloping public housing. Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, 1(1), 62-95.
83. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago The University of Chicago Press.
84. Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press.