Creating mixed-income developments in Chicago: Developer and service provider perspectives

Housing Policy Debate

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 91-118

  Joseph, Mark L ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Development revitalization; HOPE VI; Mixed income housing; Public housing

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955025514     PISSN: 10511482     EISSN: 2152050X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511481003599894     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Boston, Thomas D. 2005. Environment matters: The effect of mixed-income revitalization on the socio-economic status of public housing residents: A case study of Atlanta. Working Paper 1, Georgia Institute of Technology.
2. Brophy, Paul C., and Rhonda N. Smith. 1997. Mixed-income housing: Factors for success. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy and Development Research 3, no. 2: 3-31.
3. Chicago Housing Authority. 2005. FY2006 annual plan: Plan for transformation year 7. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Housing Authority.
4. Chicago Housing Authority. 2006. FY2007 annual plan: Plan for transformation year 8. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Housing Authority.
5. Costigan, Patrick M., and Leo V. Quigley. 2006. Resident success in economically integrated, Socially diverse housing. Washington, DC: The Community Builders.
6. Cunningham, Mary K., Susan J. Popkin, and Martha Burt. 2005. Public housing transformation and the "Hard to house. ". In A roof over their heads. Policy brief 9. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
7. Epps, Gayle. 1996. Emerging strategies for revitalizing public housing communities. Housing Policy Debate 7, no. 3: 563-88.
8. Fischer, Paul. 2002. Where are the public housing families going? An update. Lake Forest, IL: Lake Forest College.
9. Goetz, Edward. 2003. Housing dispersal programs. Journal of Planning Literature 18, no. 13-16.
10. Grossman, Kate. N. 2006. Where did all the people go? Chicago, IL: Chicago Sun-Times. World Wide Web page http://www.suntime.com/news/metro/90244.CST-NWSmain10. article (accessed January 29, 2007).
11. Joseph, Mark L. 2006. Is mixed-income development an antidote to urban poverty? Housing Policy Debate 17, no. 2: 209-34.
12. Joseph, Mark L., Robert J. Chaskin, and Henry S. Webber. 2007. The theoretical basis for confronting poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Review 42, no. 3: 369-409.
13. Khadduri, Jill. 2001. Deconcentration: What do we mean? What do we want? Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research 5, no. 2: 69-84.
14. Kleit, Rachel G. 2005. HOPE VI new communities: Neighborhood relationships in mixedincome housing. Environment and Planning A 37, no. 8: 1413-41.
15. Metropolitan Planning Council. 2003. CHA plan for transformation July 2003 progress report. Chicago, IL: Metropolitan Planning Council.
16. Metropolitan Planning Council. 2005a. CHA plan for transformation July 2005 update. Chicago, IL: Metropolitan Planning Council.
17. Metropolitan Planning Council. 2005b. CHA plan for transformation November 2005 update. Chicago, IL: Metropolitan Planning Council.
18. Metropolitan Planning Council. 2006. CHA plan for transformation August 2006 update. Chicago, IL: Metropolitan Planning Council.
19. National Opinion Research Center. 2006. Resident relocation survey: Phase III first follow-up findings and methodology. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
20. NeighborWorks America. 2006. Seven strategies for successfully marketing and stabilizing the occupancy ofmixed-income/mixed-race properties.Washington, DC:NeighborWorks America.
21. Olivo, Antonio. 2005. CHA asks status of 51,000 on waiting list. Chicago, IL: Chicago Tribune. August 2, 2005.
22. Popkin, Susan J. 2002. The Hope VI program: What about the residents? Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
23. Popkin, Susan J., Bruce Katz, Mary Cunningham, Karen D. Brown, Jeremy Gustafson, and Margery Turner. 2004. A decade of Hope VI: Research findings and policy challenges. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute and The Brookings Institution.
24. Popkin, Susan J., Larry F. Buron, Diane K. Levy, and Mary K. Cunningham. 2000. The Gautreaux legacy: What might mixed-income and dispersal strategies mean for the poorest public housing tenants? Housing Policy Debate 11, no. 4: 911-42.
25. Requejo, Roberto. 2003. CHA takes first step to transform service connectors. Chicago, IL: Metropolitan Planning Council. World Wide Web page http://www.metroplanning.org/articleDetail.asp?objectID=1667 (accessed February 7, 2007).
26. Requejo, Roberto. 2004. New service connector program serves 11,000 public housing households. Chicago, IL: Metropolitan Planning Council. World Wide Web page http://www.metroplanning.org/articleDetail.asp?objectID=2026 (accessed February 7, 2007).
27. Requejo, Roberto. 2006. Housing Associate, Metropolitan Planning Council. Personal communication April 28.
28. Rosenbaum, James E., Linda K. Stroh, and Cathy Flynn. 1998. Lake Parc place: A study of mixed-income housing. Housing Policy Debate 9, no. 4: 703-40.
29. Salama, J. 1999. The redevelopment of distressed public housing: Early results from HOPE IV projects in Atlanta, Chicago, and San Antonio. Housing Policy Debate 10, no. 1: 95-142.
30. Schubert, Michael, and Alison Thresher. 1996. Lessons from the field: Three case studies of mixed-income housing developments. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois at Chicago, Great Cities Institute Working Paper.
31. Schwartz, Alex, and Tajbakhsh Kian. 1997. Mixed income housing: Unanswered questions. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy and Development Research 3, no. 2: 71-92.
32. Smith, Alistair. 2002. Mixed-income housing developments: Promise and reality. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University.
33. Suchman, Diane. 1995. Mixed-income housing. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
34. Turbov, Mindy, and Valerie Piper. 2005. HOPE VI and mixed-finance redevelopments: A catalyst for neighborhood renewal. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
35. Varady, David P., Raffel Jeffrey A., Sweeney Stephanie, and Denson Latina. 2005. Attracting middle income families in the HOPE VI public housing revitalization program. Journal of Urban Affairs 27, no. 2: 149-64.
36. Venkatesh, Sudhir A., Isil Celimli, Douglas Miller, Alexandra Murphy, and Beauty Turner. 2004. Chicago public housing transformation: A research report. Working Paper. New York, NY: Columbia University Center for Urban Research and Policy.
37. Von Hoffman, Alexander. 1996. High ambitions: The past and future of American low-income housing policy. Housing Policy Debate 7, no. 3: 423-46.
38. Williams, Kale, Paul Fischer, and Mary Ann Russ. 2003. Temporary relocation, permanent choice: Serving families with rent vouchers during the Chicago Housing Authority Plan for transformation. Chicago, IL: Commissioned by the Metropolitan Planning Council for the Chicago Housing Authority.