Interaction-based feature selection and classification for high-dimensional biological data

Bioinformatics

Volumn 28, Issue 21, 2012, Pages 2834-2842

  Wang, Haitian ^a,b   Lo, Shaw Hwa ^c   Zheng, Tian ^c   Hu, Inchi ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

^b CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CLASSIFICATION; EPISTASIS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MULTIGENE FAMILY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, NEOPLASTIC; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL;

EID: 84868034825     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts531     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Agresti, A. (1996) An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Wily, New York.
2. Beketic-Oreskovic, L. et al. (2011) Prognostic significance of carbonic anhydrase IX (CA-IX), endoglin (CD105) and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) in breast cancer patients. Pathol. Oncol. Res., 17, 593-33.
3. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate-A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. JRSS B, 57, 289-33.
4. Breiman, L. (2001) Random forests. Mach. Learn., 45, 532.
5. Carlborg, O. and Haley, C.S. (2004) Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies. Nat. Rev. Genet., 5, 618-33.
6. Chernoff, H. et al. (2009) Discovering influential variables: a method of partitions. Ann. Appl. Stat., 3, 1335-33.
7. Cordell, H.J. (2009) Detecting gene-gene interactions that underlies human diseases. Nat. Rev. Genet., 10, 392-33.
8. Dash, M. and Liu, H. (1997) Feature selection for classification. Intel. Data Anal., 1, 131-33.
9. Dietterich, T.G. (2000) Ensemble methods in machine learning. In Kittler, J. and Roli, F. (eds.) First International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.(.). Springer, New York, pp. 1-15.
10. Efron, B. et al. (2001) Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. JASA, 96, 1151-33.
11. Fan, J. and Lv, J. (2008) Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 70, 849-33.
12. Freund, Y. and Schapire, R. (1997) A decision-theoretic generalization of online learning and an application to boosting. J. Comput. Sys. Sci., 55, 119-33.
13. Golub, T.R. et al. (1999) Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science, 286, 531-33.
14. Guyon, I. et al. (2002) Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machine. Mach. Learn., 46, 389-33.
15. Guyon, I. and Elisseeff, A. (2003) An introduction to variable and feature selection. JMLR, 3, 1157-33.
16. Hall, P. (1988) The Theory of Coverage Process. Wily, New York.
17. Khan, A.I. et al. (2011) Negative epistasis between beneficial mutations in an evolving bacterial population. Science, 332, 1193-33.
18. Kooperberg, C. et al. (2010) Structures and assumptions: strategies to harness gene x gene and gene x environment interactions in GWAS. Stat. Sci., 24, 472-33.
19. Liu, H. and Yu, L. (2005) Toward integrating feature selection algorithms for classification and clustering. IEEE Tran. Knowl Data Eng., 17, 491-33.
20. Lo, S.H. and Zheng, T. (2002) Backward haplotype transmission association algo-rithm\a fast multiple-marker screening method. Hum. Her., 53, 197-33.
21. Moore, J.H. and Williams, S.M. (2009) Epistasis and its implication for personal genetics. Am. J. Hum. Gen., 853, 309-33.
22. Perou, C.M. et al. (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature, 406, 747-33.
23. Pinheiro, C. et al. (2011) GLUT1 and CAIX expression profiles in breast cancer correlate with adverse prognostic factors and MCT1 overexpression. Histol. Histopathol., 26, 1279-33.
24. Saeys, Y. et al. (2007) A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics, 23, 2507-33.
25. Schwender, H. and Ickstadt, K. (2008) Identification of SNP interactions using logic regression. Biostatistics, 9, 187-33.
26. Shao, H. et al. (2008) Genetic architecture of complex traits: large phenotypic effects and pervasive epistasis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 19910-33.
27. Sotiriou, C. et al. (2003) Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 10393-33.
28. Tibshirani, R. (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 58, 267-33.
29. Tibshirani, R. and Efron, B. (2002) Pre-validation and inference in microarray. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol., 1, Article 1.
30. van't Veer, L.J. et al. (2002) Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature, 415, 530-33.
31. Yuan, M. and Lin, Y. (2006) Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 68, 49-33.
32. Zawistowski, J.S. et al. (2002) KRIT1 association with the integrin-binding protein ICAP-1: a new direction in the elucidation of cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM1) pathogenesis. Hum. Mol. Genet., 11, 389-33.
33. Zhang, J. et al. (2001) Interaction between krit1 and icap1alpha infers perturbation of integrin beta1-mediated angiogenesis in the pathogenesis of cerebral cavernous malformation. Hum. Mol. Genet., 10, 2953-33.
34. Zhang, H. et al. (2006) Gene selection using support vector machine with non-convex penalty. Bioinformatics, 22, 88-33.
35. Zhu, J.X. et al. (2008) On selection bias with prediction rules formed from gene expression data. J. Stat. Plann. Infer., 138, 374-33.
36. Zou, H. and Hastie, T. (2005) Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 67, 301-33.
37. Zuk, O. et al. (2011) The mystery of missing heritability: genetic interactions create phantom heritability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, Early Edition, 1-6.