Principles of tribological analysis of endoprostheses;Grundlagen zur tribologischen Analyse von Endoprothesen

Orthopade

Volumn 41, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 844-852

  Kretzer, J P ^a   Zietz, C ^b   Schroder C ^c   Reinders, J ^a   Middelborg, L ^b   Paulus, A ^c   Sonntag, R ^a   Bader, R ^b   Utzschneider, S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

^c LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Biological activity; Implant testing; Particle; Wear

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FRICTION; HUMAN; JOINT PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FRICTION; HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84867950785     PISSN: 00854530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00132-012-1948-1     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Al-Saffar N, Revell PA (1999) Pathology of the bone-implant interfaces. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 9:319-347 (Pubitemid 30090634)
2. Antoniou J, Zukor DJ, Mwale F et al (2008) Metal ion levels in the blood of patients after hip resurfacing: a comparison between twenty-eight and thirty-six-millimeter-head metal-on-metal prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 90(3):142-148
3. Barbour PS, Barton DC, Fisher J (1997) The influence of stress conditions on the wear of UHMWPE for total joint replacements. J Mater Sci Mater Med 8:603-611 (Pubitemid 27458480)
4. Bishop NE, Waldow F, Morlock MM (2008) Friction moments of large metal-on-metal hip joint bearings and other modern designs. Med Eng Phys 30:1057-1064
5. Bragdon CR, Jasty M, Muratoglu OK et al (2003) Third-body wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene in a hip simulator. J Arthroplasty 18:553-561 (Pubitemid 37040348)
6. Campbell P, Ma S, Yeom B et al (1995) Isolation of predominantly submicron-sized UHMWPE wear particles from periprosthetic tissues. J Biomed Mater Res 29(1):127-131
7. Catelas I, Campbell PA, Dorey F et al (2003) Semi-quantitative analysis of cytokines in MM THR tissues and their relationship to metal particles. Biomaterials 24:4785-4797 (Pubitemid 37188660)
8. Catelas I, Wimmer MA (2011) New insights into wear and biological effects of metal-on-metal bearings. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 93(2):76-83
9. Catelas I, Wimmer MA, Utzschneider S (2011) Polyethylene and metal wear particles: characteristics and biological effects. Semin Immunopathol 33:257-271
10. Chang CH, Fang HW, Ho YC et al (2008) Chondrocyte acting as phagocyte to internalize polyethylene wear particles and leads to the elevations of osteoarthritis associated NO and PGE2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 369:884-888
11. De Haan R, Pattyn C, Gill HS et al (2008) Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 90-B:1291-1297
12. Engh CA Jr, Macdonald SJ, Sritulanondha S et al (2009) 2008 John Charnley award: metal ion levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:101-111
13. Ezzet KA, Hermida JC, Steklov N et al (2012) Wear of polyethylene against oxidized zirconium femoral components effect of aggressive kinematic conditions and malalignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27(1):116-121
14. Fang HW, Hsu SM, Sengers JV (2003) Generation of narrowly distributed ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene particles by surface texturing techniques. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 67:741-749 (Pubitemid 37521381)
15. Fisher J, McEwen HM, Tipper JL et al (2004) Wear, debris, and biologic activity of cross-linked polyethylene in the knee: benefits and potential concerns. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:114-119 (Pubitemid 39506162)
16. Gallo J, Slouf M, Goodman SB (2010) The relationship of polyethylene wear to particle size, distribution, and number: A possible factor explaining the risk of osteolysis after hip arthroplasty. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 94:171-177
17. Galvin AL, Kang L, Udofia I et al (2009) Effect of conformity and contact stress on wear in fixed-bearing total knee prostheses. J Biomech 42:1898-1902
18. Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM et al (2009) Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 91(12):1566-1574
19. Goodman SB (2007) Wear particles, periprosthetic osteolysis and the immune system. Biomaterials 28:5044-5048 (Pubitemid 47488481)
20. Green TR, Fisher J, Matthews JB et al (2000) Effect of size and dose on bone resorption activity of macrophages by in vitro clinically relevant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene particles. J Biomed Mater Res 53:490-497
21. Grupp TM, Stulberg D, Kaddick C et al (2009) Fixed bearing knee congruency - influence on contact mechanics, abrasive wear and kinematics. Int J Artif Organs 32:213-223
22. Grupp TM, Utzschneider S, Schroder C et al (2010) Biotribology of alternative bearing materials for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Acta Biomater 6:3601-3610
23. Hallab NJ, Anderson S, Caicedo M et al (2005) Effects of soluble metals on human peri-implant cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 74:124-140 (Pubitemid 41099257)
24. Hallab NJ, Jacobs JJ (2009) Biologic effects of implant debris. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 67:182-188
25. Harman MK, Desjardins J, Benson L et al (2009) Comparison of polyethylene tibial insert damage from in vivo function and in vitro wear simulation. J Orthop Res 27:540-548
26. Heisel C, Kleinhans JA, Menge M et al (2009) Ten different hip resurfacing systems: biomechanical analysis of design and material properties. Int Orthop 33:939-943
27. Heisel C, Streich N, Krachler M et al (2008) Characterization of the running-in period in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an in vivo and in vitro metal ion analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 90(3):125-133
28. Illgen RL II, Forsythe TM, Pike JW et al (2008) Highly crosslinked vs conventional polyethylene particles - an in vitro comparison of biologic activities. J Arthroplasty 23(5):721-731
29. Koreny T, Tunyogi-Csapo M, Gal I et al (2006) The role of fibroblasts and fibroblast-derived factors in periprosthetic osteolysis. Arthritis Rheum 54:3221-3232 (Pubitemid 44622093)
30. Kretzer JP (2010) Biotribology of total hip replacement: the metal-on-metal articulation. In: Davim JP (ed) Biotribology. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 1-49
31. Kretzer JP, Jakubowitz E, Reinders J et al (2011) Wear analysis of unicondylar mobile bearing and fixed bearing knee systems: a knee simulator study. Acta Biomater 7:710-715
32. Kretzer JP, Jakubowitz E, Sonntag R et al (2010) Effect of joint laxity on polyethylene wear in total knee replacement. J Biomech 43:1092-1096
33. Kretzer J, Krachler M, Reinders J et al (2010) Determination of low wear rates in metal-on-metal hip joint replacements based on ultra trace element analysis in simulator studies. Tribol Lett 37:23-29
34. Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ et al (2010) Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 92(1):38-46
35. Libouban H, Massin P, Gaudin C et al (2009) Migration of wear debris of polyethylene depends on bone microarchitecture. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 90:730-737
36. Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD (2007) Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 89:1832-1842 (Pubitemid 47229894)
37. Manson TT, Kelly NH, Lipman JD et al (2010) Unicondylar knee retrieval analysis. J Arthroplasty 25(6):108-111
38. Mcewen HM, Barnett PI, Bell CJ et al (2005) The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. J Biomech 38:357-365 (Pubitemid 39642958)
39. McKellop HA (2007) The lexicon of polyethylene wear in artificial joints. Biomaterials 28:5049-5057 (Pubitemid 47488491)
40. Niedzwiecki S, Klapperich C, Short J et al (2001) Comparison of three joint simulator wear debris isolation techniques: acid digestion, base digestion, and enzyme cleavage. J Biomed Mater Res 56:245-249 (Pubitemid 32520700)
41. Purdue PE, Koulouvaris P, Potter HG et al (2007) The cellular and molecular biology of periprosthetic osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:251-261 (Pubitemid 46074927)
42. Ragab AA, Nalepka JL, Bi Y et al (2002) Cytokines synergistically induce osteoclast differentiation: support by immortalized or normal calvarial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 283:C679-687 (Pubitemid 34920301)
43. Revell PA (2008) The combined role of wear particles, macrophages and lymphocytes in the loosening of total joint prostheses. J R Soc Interface 5:1263-1278
44. Schmalzried TP, Jasty M, Harris WH (1992) Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty. Polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 74(6):849-863
45. Scholes SC, Unsworth A (2006) The effects of proteins on the friction and lubrication of artificial joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 220:687-693 (Pubitemid 46116923)
46. Sieving A, Wu B, Mayton L et al (2003) Morphological characteristics of total joint arthroplasty-derived ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear debris that provoke inflammation in a murine model of inflammation. J Biomed Mater Res A 64:457-464 (Pubitemid 37522485)
47. Tsukamoto R, Chen S, Asano T et al (2006) Improved wear performance with crosslinked UHMWPE and zirconia implants in knee simulation. Acta Orthop 77:505-511 (Pubitemid 43977410)
48. Underwood R, Matthies A, Cann P et al (2011) A comparison of explanted articular surface replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing components. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 93:1169-1177
49. Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Tomlinson MJ et al (2000) Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen, and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 82(4):457-476
50. Utzschneider S (2010) Verwendung von crosslinked Polyethylenen in der Knieendoprothetik und deren biologische Aktivität in vivo. Habilitationsschrift. Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universität München, Campus Großhadern
51. Utzschneider S, Becker F, Grupp TM et al (2010) Inflammatory response against different carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK wear particles compared with UHMWPE in vivo. Acta Biomater 6:4296-4304
52. Utzschneider S, Harrasser N, Schroeder C et al (2009) Wear of contemporary total knee replacements - a knee simulator study of six current designs. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 24:583-588
53. Utzschneider S, Paulus A, Datz JC et al (2009) Influence of design and bearing material on polyethylene wear particle generation in total knee replacement. Acta Biomater 5:2495-2502
54. Visentin M, Stea S, Squarzoni S et al (2004) A new method for isolation of polyethylene wear debris from tissue and synovial fluid. Biomaterials 25:5531-5537 (Pubitemid 38610192)
55. Visuri T, Pulkkinen P, Paavolainen P et al (2010) Cancer risk is not increased after conventional hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 81:77-81
56. Walter WL, Insley GM, Walter WK et al (2004) Edge loading in third generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings: Stripe wear. J Arthroplasty 19:402-413 (Pubitemid 38725921)
57. Willert HG, Semlitsch M (1977) Reactions of the articular capsule to wear products of artificial joint prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 11:157-164 (Pubitemid 8059789)
58. Wooley PH, Morren R, Andary J et al (2002) Inflammatory responses to orthopaedic biomaterials in the murine air pouch. Biomaterials 23:517-526 (Pubitemid 33051040)
59. Zysk SP, Gebhard H, Plitz W et al (2004) Influence of orthopedic particulate biomaterials on inflammation and synovial microcirculation in the murine knee joint. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 71:108-115 (Pubitemid 39299410)
60. Zysk SP, Gebhard HH, Kalteis T et al (2005) Particles of all sizes provoke inflammatory responses in vivo. Clin Orthop Relat Res (433):258-264 (Pubitemid 40489278)