Time course analysis of the effects of distractor frequency and categorical relatedness in picture naming: An evaluation of the response exclusion account

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 633-654

  Starreveld, Peter A ^a   La Heij, Wido ^b   Verdonschot, Rinus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Categorical relatedness; Distractor frequency effect; Lexical selection by competition; Picture word task; Semantic interference effect; Word production

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGERY; LINGUISTICS; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 84867881730     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2011.608026     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bloem, I. and La Heij, W. 2003. Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 48: 468 - 488.
2. Bloem, I., van den Boogaard, S. and La Heij, W. 2004. Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the Conceptual Selection Model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 51: 307 - 323.
3. Bonin, P. and Fayol, M. 2000. Writing words from pictures: What representations are activated, and when?. Memory & Cognition, 28: 677 - 689.
4. Brysbaert, M. and Cortese, M. J. 2011. Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64: 545 - 559.
5. Burnage, G. 1990. CELEX - A guide for users, Nijmegen, The Netherlands: CELEX.
6. Catling, J. C., Dent, K., Johnston, R. A. and Balding, R. 2010. Age of acquisition, word frequency, and picture-word interference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63: 1304 - 1317.
7. Damian, M. F. and Als, L. C. 2005. Long-lasting semantic context effects in the spoken production of object names. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31: 1372 - 1384.
8. Damian, M. F. and Martin, R. C. 1999. Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25: 345 - 361.
9. Damian, M. F., Vigliocco, G. and Levelt, W. J. M. 2001. Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition, 81: B77 - B86.
10. Dell, G. S. 1986. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93: 283 - 321.
11. Dell, G. S. and Reich, P. A. 1981. Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20: 611 - 629.
12. Dyer, F. N. 1973. The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes. Memory and Cognition, 1: 106 - 120.
13. Finkbeiner, M. and Caramazza, A. 2006. Lexical selection is not a competitive process: A reply to La Heij et al. (2006). Cortex, 42: 1032 - 1035.
14. Forster, K. I. and Chambers, S. M. 1973. Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12: 627 - 635.
15. Frederiksen, J. R. and Kroll, J. F. 1976. Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2: 361 - 379.
16. Fromkin, V. A. 1973. Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague: Mouton.
17. Glaser, M. O. and Glaser, W. R. 1982. Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8: 875 - 894.
18. Glaser, W. R. and Düngelhoff, F. J. 1984. The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10: 640 - 654.
19. Harley, T. A. 1990. Environmental contaminations of normal speech. Applied Psycholoinguistics, 11: 45 - 72.
20. Jescheniak, J. D. and Levelt, W. J. M. 1994. Word-frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20: 824 - 843.
21. Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, B. and New, B. 2010. SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42: 643 - 650.
22. Kroll, J. F. and Stewart, E. 1994. Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33: 149 - 174.
23. La Heij, W., Kuipers, J. R. and Starreveld, P. A. 2006. In defense of the lexical-competition account of picture-word interference: A comment on Finkbeiner and Caramazza (2006). Cortex, 42: 1028 - 1031.
24. La Heij, W., Starreveld, P. A. and Kuipers, J.-R. 2007. Structural complexity is not the (big) issue: A reply to Roelofs (2007). Language and Cognitive Processes, 22: 1261 - 1280.
25. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A. and Meyer, A. S. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 1 - 75.
26. MacKay, D. G. 1987. The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills, New York: Springer.
27. Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A. and Caramazza, A. 2007. Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33: 503 - 535.
28. McCann, R. S. and Besner, D. 1987. Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word-frequency effects in naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13: 14 - 24.
29. McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E. 1981. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception 1: An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88: 375 - 407.
30. Meringer, R., & Mayer, K. 1895. Versprechen und Verlesen: Eine psychologisch-linguistische Studie. Stuttgart, Germany: Göschense Verlagsbuchhandlung. (Reissued, with introductory essay by A. Cutler & D. A. Fay, Amsterdam, John Benjamins The Netherlands, 1978).
31. Miozzo, M. and Caramazza, A. 2003. When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132: 228 - 252.
32. Morton, J. 1969. The interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76: 165 - 178.
33. Norris, D. 2006. The Bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological Review, 113: 327 - 357.
34. Rahman, R. A. and Melinger, A. 2009. Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24: 713 - 734.
35. Richardson, J. T. E. 1976. The effects of stimulus attributes upon latency of word recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 67: 315 - 325.
36. Roelofs, A. 2005. " From Popper to Lakatos: A case for cumulative computational modeling ". In Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones, Edited by: Cutler, A. 313 - 330. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
37. Rosinski, R. R. 1977. Picture-word interference is semantically based. Child Development, 48: 643 - 647.
38. Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C. and Scarborough, H. S. 1977. Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3: 1 - 17.
39. Starreveld, P. 2000. On the interpretation of phonological context effects in word production. Journal of Memory and Language, 42: 497 - 525.
40. Starreveld, P. A. and La Heij, W. 1995. Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21: 686 - 698.
41. Starreveld, P. A. and La Heij, W. 1996. Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22: 896 - 918.
42. Starreveld, P. A. and La Heij, W. 1999. Word substitution errors in a speeded picture-word task. American Journal of Psychology, 112: 521 - 553.
43. Sternberg, S. 1969. Discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30: 276 - 315.
44. Székely, A., D'Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Federmeier, K., Herron, D. Iyer, G. 2003. Timed picture naming: Extended norms and validation against previous studies. Behavior Research: Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35: 621 - 633.
45. Underwood, G. 1976. Semantic interference from unattended printed words. British Journal of Psychology, 67: 327 - 338.
46. Van Loon-Vervoorn, W. A. 1985. Voorstelbaarheidswaarden van Nederlandse woorden, Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
47. Warren, R. E. 1972. Stimulus encoding and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94: 90 - 100.
48. Waters, G. S. and Seidenberg, M. S. 1985. Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time course and decision criteria. Memory & Cognition, 13: 557 - 572.
49. Williams, E. J. 1949. Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Australian Journal of Scientific Research, 2: 149 - 168.