Lexical selection is not a competitive process: A reply to La Heij et al. (2006)

Cortex

Volumn 42, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1032-1036

  Finkbeiner, Matthew ^a   Caramazza, Alfonso ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MENTAL FUNCTION; NOTE; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 33845911498     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 00109452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70210-7     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Alario F-X, Segui J and Ferrand L. Semantic and associative priming in picture naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53: 741-764, 2000.
2. Burt JS. Identity primes produce facilitation in a colour naming task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47A: 957-1000, 1994.
3. Caramazza A. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14: 177-208, 1997.
4. Caramazza A and Hillis A. Where do semantic errors come from? Cortex, 26: 95-122, 1990.
5. Coltheart M, Rastle K, Perry C, Ziegler J and Langdon R. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108: 204-256, 2001.
6. Costa A, Alario F-X and Caramazza A. On the categorical nature of the semantic effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychinomic Bulletin and Review, 12: 125-131, 2005.
7. Damian MF and Bowers JS. Locus of semantic interference in ipcutre-word interference tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10: 111-117, 2003.
8. Damian MF and Martin RC. Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25: 345-361, 1999.
9. Dell GS. A spreading- activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 3: 283-321, 1986.
10. Janssen N, Schirm W, Mahon BZ and Caramazza A. The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: Evidence for the response selection hypothesis (submitted).
11. La Heij W, Kuipers J-R and Starreveld PA. In defense of the lexical-competition account of picture-word interference: A comment on Finkbeiner and Caramazza (2006). Cortex, 42, 2006 (in press).
12. Levelt WJ, Roelofs A and Meyer AS. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 1-38, 1999.
13. Lupker SJ. The semantic nature of response competition in the Picture-Word Interference Task. Memory and Cognition, 7: 485-495, 1979.
14. Mahon BZ, Costa A, Peterson R, Vargas KA and Caramazza A. What is semantic interference (not) telling us? Implications for models of lexical access in speech production (submitted).
15. Miozzo M and Caramazza A. When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132: 228-252, 2003.
16. Morris AL, Harris CL, Still ML and Atkinson MB. Semantic interference and associative priming from words presented in rapid-serial-visual presentation (submitted).
17. Navarrete E and Costa A. Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 53: 359-377, 2005.
18. Rapp B and Goldrick M. Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107: 460-499, 2000.
19. Roelofs A. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42: 107-142, 1992.
20. Starreveld PA and La Heij W. Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22: 896-918, 1996.
21. Warren RE. Association, directionality, and stimulus encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102: 151-158, 1974.