Values, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and ambivalent attitudes toward women

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 42, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 2479-2504

  Feather, Norman T ^a   Mckee, Ian R ^a  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867752186     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00950.x     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
2. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The "other authoritarian personality." In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47-92). San Diego, SA: Academic Press.
3. Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113-133.
4. Biernat, M., Vescio, T. K., Theno, C. S., & Crandall, C. S. (1996). Values and prejudice: Toward understanding the impact of American values on out-group attitudes. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.). The psychology of values: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 153-189). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Christopher, A. N., & Mull, M. S. (2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 223-230.
6. Cohrs, J. C., Moschner, B., Maes, J., & Kielmann, S. (2005). The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1425-1434.
7. Doty, R. M., Peterson, B. E., & Winter, D. G. (1991). Threat and authoritarianism in the United States: 1978-1987. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 629-640.
8. Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2004). Aversive racism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 1-52). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9. Dovidio, J. F., Glick, P., & Rudman, L. A. (Eds.). (2005). On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
10. Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Duckitt, J. (2005). Personality and prejudice. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 395-412). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
12. Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on out-group attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to out-groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684-696.
13. Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113-130.
14. Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199-1213.
15. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423.
17. Feather, N. T. (1975). Values in education and society. New York: Free Press.
18. Feather, N. T. (1987). Gender differences in values: Implications of the expectancy-value model. In F. Halisch & J. Kuhl (Eds.), Motivation, intention, and volition (pp. 31-45). New York: Springer-Verlag.
19. Feather, N. T. (1990). Bridging the gap between values and actions. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 151-192). New York: Guilford.
20. Feather, N. T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1135-1151.
21. Feather, N. T. (1996a). Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 571-587.
22. Feather, N. T. (1996b). Values, deservingness, and attitudes toward high achievers:Research on tall poppies. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 215-251). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Feather, N. T. (1998). Reactions to penalties for offenses committed by the police and public citizens: Testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 528-544.
24. Feather, N. T. (1999). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
25. Feather, N. T. (2004). Value correlates of ambivalent attitudes towards gender relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 3-12.
26. Feather, N. T. (2005). Values, religion, and motivation. In M. L. Maehr & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 14, pp. 35-73). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
27. Feather, N. T., & Boeckmann, R. J. (2007). Beliefs about gender discrimination in the workplace in the context of affirmative action: Effects of gender and ambivalent attitudes in an Australian sample. Sex Roles, 57, 31-42.
28. Feather, N. T., & McKee, I. R. (2008). Values and prejudice: Predictors of attitudes towards Australian Aborigines. Australian Journal of Psychology, 60, 80-90.
29. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectfully follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
30. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001a). Ambivalent sexism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 115-188). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001b). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
32. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775.
33. Guimond, S., Dambrun, M., Michinov, N., & Duarte, S. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 697-721.
34. Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, 469-506.
35. Heaven, P. C. L., Organ, L-A., Supavadeeprasit, S., & Leeson, P. (2006). War and prejudice: A study of social values, right-wing authoritarianism, and social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 599-608.
36. Heaven, P. C. L., & St. Quintin, D. (2003). Personality factors predict racial prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 625-634.
37. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
38. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL, Version 8.3. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
39. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
40. Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163-204.
41. Katz, I., & Haas, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 898-905.
42. Kreindler, S. A. (2005). A dual group process model of individual differences in prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 90-107.
43. Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (Eds.) (2000). Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. McFarland, S. G., & Adelson, S. (1996, July). An omnibus study of personality, values, and prejudice. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Society for Political Psychology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
45. McKee, I. R., & Feather, N. T. (2008). Revenge, retribution, and values: Social attitudes and punitive sentencing. Social Justice Research, 21, 138-163.
46. Pettigrew, T. F., Stellmacher, J., Christ, O., & Wagner, A. (2008). How and why does authoritarianism predict prejudice? The mediators of a global phenomenon. Unpublished manuscript.
47. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
48. Rohan, M., & Zanna, M. P., (1996). Value transmission in families. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 253-276). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
50. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: Guilford.
51. Sales, S. M. (1973). Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: An analysis of archival data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 44-57.
52. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
53. Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Value priorities and behaviour: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54. Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents, and consequences across nations. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, & G. Eva (Eds.). Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey. London: Sage.
55. Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010-1028.
56. Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel-Lifschitz, T. (2009). Cross-national variation in the size of sex differences in values: Effects of gender equality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 171-185.
57. Sears, D. O., & Henry, P. J. (2005). Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 95-150). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
58. Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248-279.
59. Sibley, C. G., Overall, N. G., & Duckitt, J. (2007). When women become more hostilely sexist toward their gender: The system-justifying effect of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 57, 743-754.
60. Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S., & Duckitt, J. (2007). Antecedents of men's hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 160-172.
61. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 998-1011.
63. Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 126-134.
64. Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Kite, M. E. (2006). The psychology of prejudice and discrimination. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.