Value Correlates of Ambivalent Attitudes Toward Gender Relations

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 3-12

  Feather, N T ^a  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Aambivalent attitudes; Gender relations; Values

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HOSTILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HOSTILITY; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PREJUDICE; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 0348252342     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167203258825     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
3. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other "authoritarian personality." In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47-92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5. Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75-93.
6. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
7. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423.
8. Feather, N. T. (1975). Values in education and society. New York: Free Press.
9. Feather, N. T. (1979). Value correlates of conservatism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1617-1630.
10. Feather, N. T. (1984). Protestant ethic, conservatism, and values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1132-1141.
11. Feather, N. T. (1987). Gender differences in value priorities: Implications of the expectancy-value model. In F. Halisch & J. Kuhl (Eds.), Motivation, intention, and volition (pp. 31-45). New York: Springer-Verlag.
12. Feather, N. T. (1990). Bridging the gap between values and actions. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 151-192). New York: Guilford.
13. Feather, N. T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1135-1151.
14. Feather, N. T. (1996). Values, deservingness, and attitudes toward high achievers: Research on tall poppies. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 215-251). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Feather, N. T. (1999). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
16. Feather, N. T. (2002). Values and value dilemmas in relation to judgments concerning outcomes of an industrial conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 446-459.
17. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
18. French, J. R. P., & Kahn, R. L. (1962). A programmatic approach to studying the industrial environment and mental health. Journal of Social Issues, 18(3), 1-47.
19. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001a). Ambivalent sexism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 115-188). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001b). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
21. Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrica, 33, 469-506.
22. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in systemjustification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
25. Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163-204.
26. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (D. Cartwright, Ed.), New York: Harper & Row.
27. Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (1995). Relations between values, attitudes, and behavioral intentions: The moderating role of attitude function. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 266-285.
28. Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (Eds.). (2000). Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
30. Rokeach, M. (1973). The psychology of human values. New York: Free Press.
31. Rokeach, M. (1979). Understanding human values: Individual and societal. New York: Free Press.
32. Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (1995). Value priorities and readiness for out-group social contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 437-448.
33. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
34. Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Seligman, C., Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.). (1996). The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
36. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 998-1011.
38. Smith, M. B., Bruner, J. S., & White, R. W. (1956). Opinions and personality. New York: John Wiley.
39. Smith, P. B., & Schwartz, S. H. (1997). Values. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 77-118). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
40. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.