Structural and functional analysis of hemoglobin and serum albumin through protein long-range interaction networks

Current Proteomics

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 160-166

  Paci, Paola ^a   Di Paola, Luisa ^b   Santoni, Daniele ^a   de Ruvo, Micol ^b   Giuliani, Alessandro ^c  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY CAMPUS BIO MEDICO   (Italy)

^c ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ   (Italy)

Author keywords

Allosteric effect; Bioinformatics; Computational biochemistry; Graph theory; Structural biology; Topological invariants

Indexed keywords

ACETATE KINASE; CATALASE; CELLULOSE 1,4 BETA CELLOBIOSIDASE; HEMOGLOBIN; SERUM ALBUMIN; TRIACYLGLYCEROL LIPASE;

ALLOSTERISM; ARTICLE; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN LONG RANGE INTERACTION NETWORK; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84867738584     PISSN: 15701646     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/157016412803251815     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anfinsen, C. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science, 1973, 181, 223-230.
2. Dobson, C. Protein folding and misfolding. Nature, 2003, 426, 884-890.
3. Dobson, C. and Karplus, M. The fundamental of protein folding: bringing together theory and experiment. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 1999, 9(1), 92-101.
4. Dill, K. Theory for the folding and stability of globules proteins. Biochemistry, 1985, 24(6), 1501-1509.
5. Dinner, A.; Aali, A.; Smith, L.; Dobson, C. and Karplus, M. Understanding folding via free-energy surfaces from theory and experiment. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2000, 25(7), 331-339.
6. Fersht, A. Nucleation mechanisms in protein folding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 1997, 7(1), 3-9.
7. Gianni, S.; Ivarsson, Y.; Jemth, P.; Brunori, M.; Travaglini A. and Allocatelli, C. Identification and Characterization of protein folding intermediates. Biophys. Chem., 2007, 128(2-3), 105-113.
8. Privalov, P. Intermediate states in protein folding. J. Mol. Biol., 1996, 258(5),707-725.
9. Shakhnovich, E. Theoretical studies of protein folding thermodynamics and kinetics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 1997, 7(1), 29-40.
10. Baker, D. A surprising simplicity to protein folding. Nature, 2000, 405, 39-42.
11. Taketomi, H.; Ueda, Y. and Go, N. Studies on protein folding, unfolding and fluctuations by computer simulations. Intl. J. Pept. Protein Res., 1975, 7(6), 445-459.
12. Gromiha, M. and Selvaraj, S. Comparison between long-range interactions and contact order in determining the folding rate of two-state proteins: application of long-range order to folding rate. J. Mol. Biol., 2001, 310, 27-32.
13. Gromiha, M. Importance of native state topology for determining the folding rate of two-state proteins. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci., 2003, 43, 1481-1485.
14. Gromiha, M. and Selvaraj, S. Inter-residue interactions in protein folding and stability. Progr. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 2004, 86(2), 235-277.
15. Gromiha, M. Multiple contact network is a key determinant to protein folding rate. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 2009, 49, 1130-1135.
16. Plaxco, K.; Simons, K. and Baker, D. Contact order, transitions state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 1998, 277, 985-994.
17. Sengupta, D. and Kundu, S. Protein contact networks at different length scales and role of hydrophobic, hydrophilic and charged residues in protein's structural organization Arvix Preprint, 2010.
18. Bagler, G. and Sinha, S. Assortative mixing in protein contact networks and protein folding kinetics. Bioinformatics, 2007, 23(14), 1760-1767.
19. Newman, M. Assortative mixing in networks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2002, 89, 208701.
20. Poupon, A. and Mornon, J. Poulation of hydrophobic aminoacids within protein globular domains: identification of conserved 'topohydrophobic' positions. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 1998, 33(3), 329-342.
21. Dobson, C. Protein folding and misfolding. Nature, 2003, 426(6968), 884-890.
22. Dobson, C. Principles of protein folding, misfolding and aggregation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol., 2004, 15(1), 3-6.
23. Aftabuddin, M. and Kundu, S. AMINONET a tool to construct and to visualize amino acid networks, and to calculate topological parameters. J. Appl. Cryst., 2010, 43, 367-369.
24. Sengupta, D. and Kundu, S. Distributer computing and Networking. Cornell University Library 2010.
25. Gromiha, M.; Thangakani, A. and Selvaraj, S. FOLD-RATE: prediction of protein folding rates from aminoacid sequences. Nucleic Acids Res., 2006, 34, W70-W74.
26. Vendruscolo, M.; Paci, E.; Dobson, C. and Karplus, M. Three keyresidues form a critical contactr network in a protein folding transition state. Nature, 2001, 409, 641-645.
27. De Ruvo, M.; Giuliani, A.; Paci, P.; Santoni, D. and Di Paola, L. Shedding light on protein-ligand binding by graph theory: the topological nature of allostery. Biophys. Chem., 2012, 165-166, 21-29.
28. Munoz, I.; Ubahyasekera, W.; Henriksson, H.; Szabo, I.; Pettersson, G.; Johansson, G.; Wowbray, S. and Stahleberg, J. Family 7 cellobiohydrolase from Phanerochaete chrysosporium: crystal structure of the catalytic module Cel7D at 1.32 A resolution and homology models of the isozyme. J. Mol. Biol., 2001, 14(314), 1097-1111.
29. Gorrell, A.; Lawrence, S. and Ferry, J. Structural and kinetic analyses of arginine residues in the active site of acetyate kinase from Methanosarcina thermophyla. J. Biol. Chem., 2005, 280(11), 10731-10742.
30. Fita, I. and Rossmann, M. The NADPH binding site on beef liver catalase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1985, 82(6), 1604-1608.
31. Brinda, B. and Vishveshwara, S. A network representation of protein structures: implications for protein stability Biophys. J., 2005, 89(6), 4159-4170.
32. Greene, L.H. and Highman, V.A. Uncovering network systems within protein structures. J. Mol. Biol., 2003, 334, 781-791.
33. Gursoy, A.; Keskin, O. and Nussinov, R. Topological properties of protein interaction networks from a topological perspective. Biochem. Soc. Trans., 2008, 36(6), 1398-1403.
34. Zbilut, J.; Chua, G.; Krishnan, A.; Bossa, C.; Rother, K.; Webber, C. and Giuliani, A. A topologically related singularity suggests a maximum preferred size in protein domains. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf., 2007, 66, 621-629.
35. Süel, M.; Lockless, S.; Wall, M. and Ranganathan, R. Evolutionarily conserved networks of residues mediate allosteric communication in proteins Nature Struct. Biol., 2002, 10(1), 59-69.
36. Vendruscolo, M.; Dokholyan, N.; Paci, E. and Karplus, M. Smallworld view of amino acids that play a key role in protein folding Phys. Rev. E., 2002, 65, 061910.
37. Giuliani, A.; Di Paola, L. and Setola, R. Proteins as networks: a mesoscopic approach using hemoglobin molecule as case study Curr. Proteomics, 2009, 6(4), 235-245.
38. Newman, M. Networks: An introduction; OxfordUniversity Press, USA, 2010.
39. Di Paola, L.; Paci, P.; Santoni, D.; De Ruvo, M. and Giuliani, A. Proteins as sponges: a statistical journey along protein structure organization principles. J. Chem. Inf., 2012, 52(2), 474-482.
40. Bartoli, L.; Fariselli, P. and Casadio, R. The effect of backbone on the small-world properties of protein contact maps Phys. Biol., 2008, 4(4), 1-5.