Populations of hydrophobic amino acids within protein globular domains: Identification of conserved 'topohydrophobic' positions

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 329-342

  Poupon, Anne ^a,b   Mornon, Jean Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

^b LMCP   (France)

Author keywords

Families; Solvent accessibility; Substitutions

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALPHA HELIX; AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; BETA CHAIN; DATA BASE; HYDROPHOBICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STEREOCHEMISTRY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; AMINO ACIDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; SOLVENTS; VIRAL PROTEINS;

EID: 0032534020     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19981115)33:3<329::AID-PROT3>3.0.CO;2-E     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anfinsen, C.B. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 181:223-230, 1973.
2. Lawrence, C., Auger, I., Manella, C. Distribution of accessible surfaces of amino acids in globular proteins. Proteins 2:153-161, 1987.
3. Ladunga, I., Smith, R.F. Amino acid substitutions preserve protein folding by conserving steric and hydrophobicity properties. Protein Eng. 10:187-196, 1997.
4. Koshi, J.M., Goldstein, R.A. Mutation matrices and physical-chemical properties: Correlations and implications. Proteins 27:336-344, 1997.
5. Overington, J., Donnelly, D., Johnson, M.S., Sali, A., Blundell, T.L. Environment-specific amino acid substitution tables: Tertiary templates and prediction of protein folds. Protein Sci. 1:216-226, 1992.
6. Chothia, C., Gerstein, M. How far can sequences diverge? Nature 385:580-581, 1997.
7. Godzik, A. In search of the ideal protein sequence. Protein Eng. 8:409-416, 1995.
8. Han, K.F., Baker, D. Recurring local sequence motifs in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 251:176-187, 1995.
9. Miyata, T., Miyazawa, S., Yasunaga, T. Two types of amino acid substitutions in protein evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 12:219-236, 1979.
10. Levin, J.M., Robson, B., Garnier, J. An algorithm for secondary structure determination in proteins based on sequence similarity. FEBS Lett. 205:303-308, 1986.
11. McLachlan, A.D. Tests for comparing related amino acid sequences. Cytochrome C and cytochrome C551. J. Mol. Biol. 61:409-424, 1971.
12. Risler, J.L., Delorme, M.O., Delacroix, H., Henaut, A. Amino acid substitutions in structurally related proteins: A pattern recognition approach. J. Mol. Biol. 204:1019-1029, 1988.
13. Callebaut, I., Labesse, G., Durand, P. et al. Deciphering protein sequence information through Hydrophobic Cluster Analysis (HCA): current status and perspectives. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 53:621-645, 1997.
14. Gaboriaud, C., Bissery, V., Benchetrit, T., Mornon, J.P. Hydrophobic Cluster Analysis: an efficient new way to compare and analyse amino acid sequences. FEBS Lett. 224:149-155, 1987.
15. Woodcock, S., Mornon, J.-P., Henrissat, B. Detection of secondary structure elements in proteins by Hydrophobic Cluster Analysis. Protein Eng. 5:629-635, 1992.
16. Altschul, S., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E., Lipman, D. Basic and local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410, 1990.
17. Labesse, G. MulBlast: a multiple alignment of BLAST output to boost protein sequence similarity. CABIOS 12: 463-467, 1996.
18. Tuffery, P. XmMol: an X11 and motif program for macromolecular visualization and modeling. J. Mol. Graph. 13:67-72, 1995.
19. Sutcliffe, M.J., Haneef, I., Carney, D., Blundell, T. Knowledge based modelling of homologous proteins, Part I: Three-dimensional frameworks derived from the simultaneous superposition of multiple structures. Protein Eng. 1:377-384, 1987.
20. Lee, B.K., Richards, F.M. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 55:379-400, 1971.
21. Bernstein, F.C., Koetzle, T.F., Williams, G. The protein data bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112:535-542, 1977.
22. Hobohm, U., Scharf, M., Schneider, R., Sander, C. Selection of a representative set of structures from the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank. Protein Sci. 1:409-417, 1992.
23. Hobohm, U., Sander, C. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci. 3:522-529, 1994.
24. Koshi, J.M., Goldstein, R.A. Context-dependent optimal substitution matrices. Protein Eng. 8:641-645, 1995.
25. Nozaki, Y. and Tanford, C. The solubility of amino acids and two glycine peptides in aqueous ethanol and dioxane solutions. J. Biol. Chem. 246:2211-2217, 1971.
26. Tanford, C. The hydrophobic effect and the organization of living matter. Science 200:1012, 1978.
27. Wolfenden, R., Andersson, L., Cullis, P.M., Southgate, C.C.B. Affinities of amino acid side-chains for solvent water. Biochemistry 20:849-855, 1981.
28. Wolfenden, R. Waterlogged molecules. Science 222:1087-1093, 1983.
29. Chothia, C. The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 105:1-14, 1976.
30. Chothia, C. Principles that determine the structure of proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 53:537-572, 1984.
31. Janin, J. Surface and inside volumes in globular proteins. Nature 277:491-492, 1979.
32. Rose, G.D., Geselowitz, A.R., Lesser, G.J., Lee, R.H., Zehfus, M.H. Hydrophobicity of amino acid residues in globular proteins. Science 229:834-838, 1985.
33. Wertz, D.H., Scheraga, H.A. Influence of water on protein structure. An analysis of the preferences of amino acid residues for the inside or outside and for specific conformations in a protein molecule. Macromolecules 11:9-15, 1978.
34. Robson, B. and Osguthorpe, D.J. Refined models for computer simulations of protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 132:19-51, 1979.
35. Eisenberg, D., McLachlan, A.D. Solvatation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature 319:199-203, 1986.
36. Bull, H.B., Breese, K. Surface tension of amino acid solutions: a hydrophobicity scale of the amino acid residues. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 161:665-670, 1974.
37. Radzicka, A. and Wolfenden, R. Comparing the polarities of the amino acids: side-chain distribution coefficients between the vapor phase, cyclohexane, 1-octanol, and neutral aqueous phase. Biochemistry 27:1664-1670, 1988.
38. Guy, H.R. Amino acid side-chain partition energies and distribution of residues in soluble proteins. Biophys. J. 47:61-70, 1985.
39. Rost, B. and Sander, C. Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins 20:216-226, 1994.
40. Kapp, O.H., Moens, L., Vanfleteren, J., Trotman, C.N.A., Suzuki, T., Vinogradov, S.N. Alignment of 700 globin sequences: extent of amino acid substitution and its correlation with variation in volume. Protein Sci. 4:2179-2190, 1995.
41. Swindells, M.B. A procedure for the automatic determination of Hydrophobic cores in protein structures. Protein Sci. 4:93-102, 1995.
42. Gulgolya, Z., Dosztányi, Z., Simon, I. Interresidue interactions in protein classes. Proteins 27:360-366, 1997.
43. Shindyalov, I.N., Kolchanov, N.A., Sander, C. Can three-dimensional contacts in protein structures be predicted by analysis of correlated mutations? Protein Eng. 7:349-358, 1994.
44. Bashford, D., Chothia, C., Lesk, A.M. Determinants of a protein fold. J. Mol. Biol. 196:199-216, 1987.
45. Bowie, J.U., Sauer, R.T. Identifying determinants of folding and activity for a protein of unknown struture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:2152-2156, 1989.
46. Labesse, G., Colloc'h, N., Pothier, J., Mornon, J.-P. P_SEA: a new efficient assignment of secondary structure from Cα trace of proteins. CABIOS 13:291-295, 1997.