Organizational innovation adoption: A multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 163-176

  Frambach, Ruud T ^a   Schillewaert, Niels ^b,c  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c VLERICK BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Adoption; Diffusion; Innovation; Organizations; Technology acceptance

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011763155     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00152-1     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Agarwal R, Prasad J. The antecedents and consequences of user perceptions in information technology adoption. Decis Support Syst 1998;22:15-29.
2. Anderson JC, Narus JA. Business market management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1999.
3. Baldwin WL, Scott JT. Market structure and technological change. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1987.
4. Bass FM. A new product growth model for consumer durables. Manage Sci 1969;15:215-27 (January).
5. Bhattacherjee A. Managerial influences on intra-organizational information technology use: a principal-agent model. Decis Sci 1998;29:139-62.
6. Cardozo R, McLaughlin K, Harmon B, Reynolds P, Miller B. Product-market choices and growth of new businesses. J Prod Innovation Manage 1993;10:331-40.
7. Choffray J-M, Lilien GL. Market planning for new industrial products. New York: Wiley, 1980.
8. Clegg C, Carey N, Dean G, Hornby P, Bolden R. User's reactions to information technology: some multivariate models and their implications. J Inf Technol 1997;12:15-32.
9. Cohn SF, Turyn RM. Organizational structure, decision-making procedures, and the adoption of innovations. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 1984;31:154-61 (November).
10. Damanpour F. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad Manage J 1991;34:555-90.
11. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci 1989;35:982-1003.
12. Easingwood C, Beard C. High technology launch strategies in the U.K. Ind Mark Manage 1989;18:125-38.
13. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
14. Fisher RJ, Price LL. An investigation into the social context of early adoption behavior. J Consum Res 1992;19:477-87 (December).
15. Frambach RT, Barkema HG, Nooteboom B, Wedel M. Adoption of a service innovation in the business market: the influence of supplier variables. J Bus Res 1998;41:161-74 (February).
16. Gatignon H, Robertson TS. Technology diffusion: an empirical test of competitive effects. J Mark 1989;53:35-49 (January).
17. Gauvin S, Sinha RK. Innovativeness in industrial organizations: a two-stage model of adoption. Int J Res Mark 1993;10:165-83.
18. Granovetter M, Soong R. Threshold models of interpersonal effects in consumer demand. J Econ Behav Organ 1986;7:83-99 (March).
19. Han JK, Namwoon K, Srivastava R. Market orientation and organizational performance: is innovation a missing link? J Mark 1998;62:30-45 (October).
20. Holak S. Determinants of innovative durables adoption; an empirical study with implications for early product screening. J Prod Innovation Manage 1988;5:50-69.
21. Holak SL, Lehmann DR. Purchase intentions and the dimensions of innovation: an exploratory model. J Prod Innovation Manage 1990;7:59-73.
22. Holak SL, Lehmann DR, Sultan F. The role of expectations in the adoption of innovative consumer durables: some preliminary evidence. J Retailing 1987;63:243-59.
23. Hultink EJ, Griffin A, Hart S, Robben HSJ. Industrial new product launch strategies and product development performance. J Prod Innovation Manage 1997;14:243-57.
24. Hurley RF, Hult TG. Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. J Mark 1998;62:42-54 (July).
25. Igbaria M. End-user computing effectiveness: a structural equation model. Omega 1990;18:637-52.
26. Igbaria M. User acceptance of microcomputer technology: an empirical test. Omega 1993;21:73-90.
27. Igbaria M, Parasuraman M, Baroudi J. A motivational model of microcomputer usage. J Manage Inf Syst 1996;13:127-43.
28. Igbaria M, Pavri F, Huff S. Microcomputer applications: an empirical look at usage. Inf Manage 1989;16:187-96.
29. Ives B, Olson MH. User involvement and MIS success: a review of research. Manage Sci 1984;30:586-603.
30. Kamien MI, Schwartz NL. Market structure and innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1982.
31. Katz M, Shapiro C. Systems competition and network effects. J Econ Perspect 1994;8:93-115.
32. Kennedy AM. The adoption and diffusion of new industrial products: a literature review. Eur J Mark 1983;17:31-88.
33. Kimberley JR, Evanisko MJ. Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Acad Manage J 1981;24:689-713.
34. Klein K, Sorra JS. The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad Manage Rev 1996;21:1055-80.
35. Kotler P. Marketing management, analysis, planning, implementation, and control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1998.
36. Kraut R, Rice R, Cool C, Fish R. Varieties of social influence: the role of utility and norms in the success of a new communication medium. Organ Sci 1998;9:437-53.
37. Kumar V, Ganesh J, Echambadi R. Cross-national diffusion research: what do we know and how certain are we? J Prod Innovation Manage 1998;15:255-68.
38. Labay DG, Kinnear TC. Exploring the consumer decision process in the adoption of solar energy systems. J Consum Res 1981;8:271-8 (December).
39. Le Bon J, Merunka D. The role of attitude in competitive intelligence activities of salespersons: evidence and consequences of the mediating effect. ISBM Rep 1998;22.
40. Leonard-Barton D, Deschamps I. Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology. Manage Sci 1988;31:1252-65.
41. Lind MR, Zmud RW. The influence of a convergence in understanding between technology providers and users on information technology innovativeness. Organ Sci 1991;2:195-217 (May).
42. Lucas H. The use of an interactive information storage and retrieval system in medical research. Commun ACM 1978;21:197-205.
43. Mahajan V, Muller E, Bass FM. New product diffusion models in marketing: a review and directions for research. J Mark 1990;54:1-26 (January).
44. Mansfield E. The diffusion of flexible manufacturing systems in Japan, Europe and the United States. Manage Sci 1993;39:149-59 (February).
45. Manu FA, Sriram V. Innovation, marketing strategy, environment, and performance. J Bus Res 1996;39:79-91.
46. Markus L. Toward a critical mass theory of interactive media: universal access, interdependence and diffusion. In: Fulk J, Steinfeld C, editors. Organizations and communication technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
47. Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Inf Syst Res 1991;2:173-91.
48. Mathur A. Examining trying as a mediator and control as a moderator of intention-behavior relationship. Psychol Mark 1998;15:241-59.
49. Meyer AD, Goes JB. Organizational assimilation of innovations: a multilevel contextual analysis. Acad Manage J 1988;31:897-923.
50. Midgley D, Dowling G. Innovativeness: the concept and its measurement. J Consum Res 1978;4:229-42.
51. Mirvis PH, Sales AL, Hackett EJ. The implementation and adoption of new technology in organizations: the impact on work, people, and culture. Hum Resour Manage 1991;30:113-39.
52. Montoya-Weiss MM, Calantone R. Determinants of new product performance: a review and meta-analysis. J Prod Innovation Manage 1994;5:397-417.
53. Moore G, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res 1991;2:192-222 (September).
54. Morrisson P. Testing a framework for the adoption of technological innovations by organizations and the role of leading edge users. Inst Study Bus Mark 1996;1-17.
55. Nabih MI, Bloem JG, Poiesz ThBC. Conceptual issues in the study of innovation adoption behavior. Adv Consum Res 1997;24:1-7.
56. Nooteboom B. Diffusion, uncertainty, and firm size. Int J Res Mark 1989;6:109-28.
57. Olshavsky RW, Spreng RA. An exploratory study of the innovation evaluation process. J Prod Innovation Manage 1996;13:512-29.
58. Ostlund LE. Perceived innovation attributes as predictors of innovativeness. J Consum Res 1974;1:23-9.
59. Ozanne UB, Churchill GA. Five dimensions of the industrial adoption process. J Mark Res 1971;8:322-8.
60. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Rossi JS, Goldstein MG, Marcus BH, Rakowski C, Fiore C, Harlow LL, Redding CA, Roosenbloom D, Rossi SR. Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychol 1994;13:39-46.
61. Ram S, Jung HS. Forced adoption of innovations in organizations: consequences and implications. J Prod Innovation Manage 1991;8:117-26.
62. Ram S, Jung HS. Innovativeness in product usage: a comparison of early adopters and early majority. Psychol Mark 1994;11:57-67.
63. Rangaswami A, Gupta S. Innovation adoption and diffusion in the digital environment: some research opportunities, eBusiness Research Center Working Paper 02-1999, Penn State University, 1999.
64. Rice R. Computer-mediated communication system network data: theoretical concerns and empirical examples. Int J Man - Mach Stud 1990;30:627-47.
65. Robertson TS. Innovative behavior and communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.
66. Robertson TS, Gatignon H. Competitive effects on technology diffusion. J Mark 1986;50:1-12 (July).
67. Robertson TS, Wind Y. Organizational psychographics and innovativeness. J Consum Res 1980;7:24-31 (June).
68. Robinson WT. Product innovation and start-up business market share performance. Manage Sci 1990;36:1279-89.
69. Rogers EM. New product adoption and diffusion. J Consum Res 1976;2:290-301.
70. Rogers EM. The 'critical mass' in the diffusion of interactive technologies in organizations. In: Kraemer KL, editor. The information systems research challenge: survey research methods, vol. 3. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1991. pp. 245-63.
71. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: The Free Press, 1995.
72. Rosenberg M, Hovland CI. Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. In: Rosenberg M, Hovland CI, McGuire WJ, Abelson RP, Brehm JW, editors. Attitude organization and change. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1960.
73. Schultheiss E. Optimizing the organization: how to link people with technology. Cambridge, MA, 1988.
74. Sheth J. A model of industrial buyer behavior. J Mark 1973;37:50-6 (October).
75. Srinivasan R, Lilien GL, Rangaswami A. The role of technological opportunism in the adoption of radical technologies by firms: an application to E-business. Inst Study Bus Mark Rep 1999;26.
76. Steenkamp J-BEM, ter Hofstede F, Wedel M. A cross-national investigation into the individual and national-cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. J Mark 1999;63:55-69 (April).
77. Stevens RE, Warren WE, Martin RT. Nonadopters of automatic teller machines. Akron Bus Econ Rev 1989;20:55-63.
78. Sultan F, Farley JU, Lehmann DR. A meta-analysis of application of diffusion models. J Mark Res 1990;27:70-7 (February).
79. Takada H, Jain D. Cross-national analysis of diffusion of consumer durable goods in Pacific Rim countries. J Mark 1991;55:48-54 (April).
80. Thompson R, Higgins C, Howell J. Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Q 1991;15:125-43 (March).
81. Tornatzky LG, Klein KJ. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 1982;29:28-45 (February).
82. Trevino L, Webster J. Flow in computer-mediated communication. Commun Res 1992;19:539-73.
83. Triandis H. Attitude and attitude change. New York, NY: Wiley, 1971.
84. Velicer WF, DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, Brandenburg N. A decisional balance measure for assessing and predicting smoking status. J Pers Soc Psychol 1985;48:1279-89.
85. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci 1999, in press.
86. Venkatraman MP. The impact of innovativeness and innovation type on adoption. J Retailing 1991;67:51-67.
87. Venkatraman MP, Price LL. Differentiating between cognitive and sensory innovativeness: concepts, measurements, and implications. J Bus Res 1990;20:293-315 (June).
88. Warshaw PR. A new model for predicting behavioral intentions: an alternative to fishbein. J Mark Res 1980;17:153-72.
89. Webster FE, Wind Y. A general model for understanding organizational buying behavior. J Mark 1972;36:12-9 (April).
90. Zaltman G, Duncan R, Holbek J. Innovations and organizations. New York: Wiley, 1973.
91. Zmud RW. An examination of "Push-Pull" theory applied to process innovation in knowledge work. Manage Sci 1984;30:727-38.