Developing a web 2.0 diabetes care support system with evaluation from care provider perspectives

Journal of Medical Systems

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 2085-2095

  Lin, Yung Hsiu ^a,b   Chen, Rong Rong ^a   Guo, Sophie Huey Ming ^a   Chang, Hui Yu ^c   Chang, Her Kun ^a,c  

^a CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b TA HWA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^c CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Diabetes care; Self care support; Technology acceptance model; Web 2.0 application

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DIABETES MELLITUS; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH CENTER; HUMAN; NURSING STAFF; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT INFORMATION; SELF CARE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EVALUATION; INTERNET; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

ADULT; DIABETES MELLITUS; HUMANS; INTERNET; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING STAFF; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CARE; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOFTWARE DESIGN; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867519346     PISSN: 01485598     EISSN: 1573689X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-011-9672-7     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Funnell, M. M., and Anderson, R. M., Empowerment and self-management of diabetes. Clin. Diabetes. 22(3):123-127, 2004.
2. Sigurdardottir, A. K., Self-care in diabetes: model of factors affecting self-care. J. Clin. Nurs. 14(3):301-314, 2005.
3. Arsand, E., and Demiris, G., User-centered methods for designing patient-centric self-help tools. Inform. Health Soc. Ca. 33(3):158-169, 2008.
4. Ekberg, J., Ericson, L., Timpka, T., Eriksson, H., Nordfeldt, S., Hanberger, L., and Ludvigsson, J., Web 2.0 systems supporting childhood chronic disease management: design guidelines based on information behaviour and social learning theories. J. Med. Syst. 34(2):107-117, 2010.
5. Corrigan, J. M., Crossing the quality chasm. National Academy Press, Washington, 2001.
6. Ma, C., Warren, J., Phillips, P., and Stanek, J., Empowering patients with essential information and communication support in the context of diabetes. Int. J. Med. Inform. 75(8):577-596, 2006.
7. Funnell, M. M., and Anderson, R. M., The problem with compliance in diabetes. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 284:1709-1709, 2000.
8. Breen, G. M., Wan, T. T., Zhang, N. J., Marathe, S. S., Seblega, B. K., and Paek, S. C., Improving doctor-patient communication: examining innovative modalities vis-A-vis effective patient-centric care management technology. J. Med. Syst. 33(2):155-162, 2009.
9. Tani, S., Marukami, T., Matsuda, A., Shindo, A., Takemoto, K., and Inada, H., Development of a health management support system for patients with diabetes mellitus at home. J. Med. Syst. 34(3):223-228, 2010.
10. Kaplan, A., and Haenlein, M., Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons. 53(1):59-68, 2010.
11. McLean, R., Richards, B. H., and Wardman, J. I., The effect of Web 2.0 on the future of medical practice and education: Darwikinian evolution or folksonomic revolution? Med. J. Australia 187(3):174-177, 2007.
12. Boulos, M. N. K., Maramba, I., and Wheeler, S., Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Med. Educ. 6(1):41, 2006.
13. Parameswaran, M., and Whinston, A. B., Social computing: an overview. Commun. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 19:762-780, 2007.
14. Giustini, D., How Web 2.0 is changing medicine. Brit. Med. J. 333(7582):1283-1284, 2006.
15. Kamel Boulos, M. N., and Wheeler, S., The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Info. Libr. J. 24(1):2-23, 2007.
16. Davis, F. D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13(3):319-340, 1989.
17. Boisen, E., Bygholm, A., Cavan, D., and Hejlesen, O. K., Copability, coping, and learning as focal concepts in the evaluation of computerised diabetes disease management. Int. J. Med. Inform. 70(2-3):353-363, 2003.
18. Kotoula, M., Koukoulis, G., Zintzaras, E., Karabatsas, C. H., and Chatzoulis, D. Z., Metabolic control of diabetes is associated with an improved response of diabetic retinopathy to panretinal photocoagulation. Diabetes Care. 28(10):2454-2457, 2005.
19. Schoen, C., Osborn, R., How, S. K. H., Doty, M. M., and Peugh, J., In chronic condition: experiences of patients with complex health care needs, in eight countries, 2008. Health Affair. 28(1):w1-w16, 2009.
20. Alberti, K., Zimmet, P., and Consultation, W. H. O., Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabetic Med. 15(7):539-553, 1998.
21. Zazworsky, D., Bolin, J., Gaubeca, V. B., Handbook of Diabetes Management. Springer, 2005.
22. Am. Diabetes Assoc, Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2007. Diabetes Care 30:S4-S41, 2007.
23. Funnell, M. M., Brown, T. L., Childs, B. P., Haas, L. B., Hosey, G. M., Jensen, B., Maryniuk, M., Peyrot, M., Piette, J. D., and Reader, D., National standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care 31(Supplement 1):97-104, 2008.
24. Hoffman-Goetz, L., Donelle, L., and Thomson, M. D., Clinical guidelines about diabetes and the accuracy of peer information in an unmoderated online health forum for retired persons. Inform. Health Soc. Ca. 34(2):91-99, 2009.
25. Cabrera, M., Burgelmen, J. C., Boden, M., da Costa, O., Rodriguez, C., eHealth in 2010: Realising a Knowledge-based Approach to Healthcare in the EU. European Commission Directorate-General Joint Research Centre Technical Report EUR 21486, 2004.
26. Green, C. J., Fortin, P., Maclure, M., Macgregor, A., and Robinson, S., Information system support as a critical success factor for chronic disease management: necessary but not sufficient. Int. J. Med. Inform. 75(12):818-828, 2006.
27. Leiner, B., Cerf, V., Clark, D. D., Kahn, R. E., Kleinrock, L., Lynch, D. C., Postel, J., Roberts, L. G., and Wolff, S., A brief history of the Internet. Comput. Commun. Rev. 39(5):22-31, 2009.
28. Davis, F. D., A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-user Information Systems: Theory and Results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management. 1985.
29. Hu, P., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., and Tam, K. Y., Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 16(2):91-112, 1999.
30. Lai, T., Larson, E. L., Rockoff, M. L., and Bakken, S., User acceptance of HIV TIDES-tailored interventions for management of depressive symptoms in persons living with HIV/AIDS. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assn. 15(2):217-226, 2008.
31. Chen, I. J., Yang, K., Tang, F. I., Huang, C. H., and Yu, S., Applying the technology acceptance model to explore public health nurses' intentions towards web-based learning: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 45(6):869-878, 2008.
32. Carroll, J. M., Five reasons for scenario-based design. Interact. Comput. 13(1):43-60, 2000.
33. Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Chin, G., Jr., and Koenemann, J., Requirements development in scenario-based design. IEEE T. Software Eng. 24(12):1156-1170, 2002.
34. Lo, B., and Parham, L., The impact of Web 2.0 on the doctor patient relationship. J. Law, Med. Ethics. 38(1):17-26, 2010.
35. Carter, S., The New Language of Business: SOA & Web 2.0. IBM Press. 2007.
36. Foster, I., Service-oriented science. Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci. 308:814-817, 2005.