Web 2.0 systems supporting childhood chronic disease management: Design guidelines based on information behaviour and social learning theories

Journal of Medical Systems

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 107-117

  Ekberg, Joakim ^a   Ericson, Leni ^a   Timpka, Toomas ^a   Eriksson, Henrik ^a   Nordfeldt, Sam ^a   Hanberger, Lena ^a   Ludvigsson, Johnny ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Communities of practice; Design; Diabetes; Informal learning; Information behaviour; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT HEALTH; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR LEARNING THEORY; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIABETES MELLITUS; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERNET; LEARNING THEORY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROCESS DESIGN; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL LEARNING; SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMMUNICATION; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; HUMANS; INTERNET; LEARNING; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 77950460134     PISSN: 01485598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-008-9222-0     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Livingstone, D. W., Researching expanded notions of learning and work and underemployment: findings of the first Canadian survey of informal learning practices. Int. Rev. Educ. 46:491-514, 2000. doi:10.1023/A:1026522810394.
2. McLean, R., Richards, B. H., and Wardman, J. I., The effect of Web 2.0 on the future of medical practice and education: darwikinian evolution or folksonomic revolution? Med. J. Aust. 187(3):174-177, 2007.
3. Lave, J., and Wenger, E., Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1991.
4. Johnson, C. M., A survey of current research on online communities of practice. Internet High. Educ. 4:45-60, 2001. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00047-1. (Pubitemid 43231666)
5. Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P., Organizational learning and communities of practice. Organ. Sci. 2:40-57, 1991.
6. Davenport, E., and Hall, H. Organ. Knowl. Communities Pract. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 36:171-227, 2002. ARIST
7. Hung, W. L. D., and Chen, D. T. V., Learning within the context of communities of practices: are-conceptualization of tools, rules and roles of the activity system. Educ. Media Int. 39:247-255, 2002. doi: 10.1080/ 09523980210166468. (Pubitemid 36087004)
8. Putnam, R. D., Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster, London, 2000.
9. Covello, V. T., Peters, R. G., Wojtecki, J. G., and Hyde, R. C, Risk communication, the West Nile virus epidemic, and bioterrorism: responding to the communication challenges posed by the intentional or unintentional release of a pathogen in an urban setting. J. Urban Health. 78(2):382-391, 2001. doi:10.1093/ jurban/78.2.382.
10. American Library Association, American library association presidential committee on information literacy. Final report. American Library Association, Chicago, IL, 1989.
11. Wilson, T. D., Models in information behavior research. J. Doc. 55:249-270, 1999. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007145.
12. Hjørland, B., Theory and metatheory of information science: a new interpretation. J. Doc. 54:606-621, 1998. doi:10.1108/ EUM0000000007183. (Pubitemid 39122316)
13. Timpka, T., Eriksson, H, Ludvigsson, J., Ekberg, J., Nordfeldt, S., and Hanberger, L., Web 2.0 systems supporting childhood chronic disease management: a general architecture compliant with the WHA eHealth resolution Submitted for publication 2008.
14. Johansson, M., and Timpka, T, Quality functions for requirements engineering in system development methods. Med. Inform. 21 (2):133-145, 1996. (Pubitemid 26401862)
15. Pilemalm, S., and Timpka, T, Third generation participatory design in health informatics\making user participation applicable to large-scale information system projects. J. Biomed. Inform. 41 (2):327-339, 2008. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2007.09.004.
16. Stake, R. E., The art of case study research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1995.
17. Savolainen, R., The sense-making theory: reviewing the interests of a user-centered approach to information seeking and use. Inf. Process. Manage. 29:13-28, 1993. doi:10.1016/0306-4573(93) 90020-E.
18. Shannon, D., Kuhlthau's Inf. Search Process Sch. Libr. Media Act. Mon. 19:19-23, 2002.
19. Ford, N., and Murphy, G, The development and piloting of a training web site for health and safety enforcement officers. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 33:65-76, 2002. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00239. (Pubitemid 34280877)
20. Spink, A., Wilson, T D., Ford, N., and Ellis, D., Information seeking and mediated searching study. Part 3. Successive searching. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 53:716-727, 2002. (Pubitemid 34720818)
21. Wilson, T D., Ford, N., Ellis, D., Foster, A., and Spink, A., Information seeking and mediated searching study. Part 2. Uncertainty and its correlates. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 53:704-715, 2002. doi:10.1002/asi.10082. (Pubitemid 34720817)
22. Barry, C. L., User-defined relevance criteria: an exploratory study. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 45:149-159, 1994. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097- 4571(199404)45:3 3.0.CO;2-J.
23. Byström, K., and Jarvelin, K., Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Inf. Process. Manage. 31:191-213, 1995. doi: 10.1016/0306-4573(94)00041-Z.
24. Hjørland, B., and Albrechtsen, H, Toward a new horizon in information science: domain-analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 46:400-425, 1995. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199507) 46:63.0.CO;2-Y.
25. Barry, C. L., and Schamber, L., Users' criteria for relevance evaluation: a cross-situational comparison. Inf. Process. Manage. 34:219-236, 1998. doi:10.1016/S0306-4573(97)00078-2. (Pubitemid 128392791)
26. Spink, A., Greisdorf, H, and Bateman, J., A study of mediated
27. Tang, R., and Solomon, P., Toward an understanding of the dynamics of relevance judgment: an analysis of one person's search behavior. Inf. Process. Manage. 34:237-256, 1998. doi:10.1016/S0306-4573(97)00081-2. (Pubitemid 128392792)
28. Yoon, K., and Nilan, M. S., Toward a reconceptualization of information seeking research: focus on the exchange of meaning. Inf. Process. Manage. 35:871-890, 1999. doi:10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00031-X. (Pubitemid 30509557)
29. Vakkari, P., Task complexity, problem structure and information actions: integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage. 35:819-837, 1999. doi:10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00028-X. (Pubitemid 30509554)
30. Cairns, T., For the sake of informality. Adults Learn (England). 12:316-318, 2000.
31. Timpka, T. T., Proactive health computing. Artif. Intell. Med. 23:113-124, 2001. doi:10.1016/S0933-3657(01)00073-2. (Pubitemid 32677975)
32. Brockett, R. G., and Hiemstra, R., Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. Routledge series on theory and practice of adult education in North America. Routledge, London, 1991.