Conservation genetics and evolution in an endangered species: Research in Sonoran topminnows

Evolutionary Applications

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 806-819

  Hedrick, Philip W ^a   Hurt, Carla R ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Biology   (United States)

Author keywords

Evolutionary significant units; Inbreeding depression; Major histocompatibility complex; MtDNA; Outbreeding depression; Reproductive isolation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867512910     PISSN: 17524563     EISSN: 17524571     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00259.x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Adams, J. R., L. M. Vucetich, P. W. Hedrick, R. O. Peterson, and J. A. Vucetich 2011. Genomic sweep and potential genetic rescue during limiting environmental conditions in an isolated wolf population. Proceedings Royal Society London B20:3336-3344.
2. Allendorf, F. W., and G. Luikart 2007. Conservation and the Genetics of Populations. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, NY.
3. Arkush, K. D., A. R. Giese, H. L. Mendonca, A. M. McBride, G. D. Marty, and P. W. Hedrick 2002. Resistance to three pathogens in the endangered winter-run Chinook salmon: effects of inbreeding and MHC genotypes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science59:966-975.
4. Ballou, J. D. 1997. Ancestral inbreeding only minimally effects inbreeding depression in mammalian populations. Journal of Heredity88:169-178.
5. Bernatchez, L., and C. Landry 2003. MHC studies in nonmodel vertebrates: what have we learned about natural selection in 15years?Journal of Evolutionary Biology16:363-377.
6. Brewer, B. A., R. C. Lacy, M. L. Foster, and G. Alaks 1990. Inbreeding depression in insular and central populations of Peromyscus mice. Journal of Heredity81:257-266.
7. Cardwell, T., R. J. Sheffer, and P. W. Hedrick 1998. Genetic differences in male development time among populations of the endangered Gila topminnow. Journal of Heredity89:353-355.
8. Cardwell, T. N., R. J. Sheffer, and P. W. Hedrick 2001. MHC variation and tissue transplantation in fish. Journal of Heredity92:305-308.
9. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth 1999. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genetical Research74:329-340.
10. Charlesworth, D., and J. H. Willis 2009. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Reviews Genetics10:783-796.
11. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution43:362-381.
12. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr 1997. "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution51:295-303.
13. Crandall, K. A., O. R. P. Binida-Edmonds, G. M. Mace, and R. K. Wayne 2000. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution15:290-295.
14. Diamond, J. 1989. Overview of recent extinctions. In D. Western, and M. C. Pearl, eds. Conservation for the Twenty-first Century, pp. 37-41. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY.
15. Frankham, R., J. D. Ballou, and D. A. Briscoe 2010. Introduction to Conservation Genetics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. Frankham, R., J. D. Ballou, M. D. B. Eldridge, R. C. Lacy, K. Ralls, M. R. Dudash, and C. B. Fenster 2011. Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conservation Biology25:465-475.
17. Fraser, D. J., and L. Bernatchez 2001. Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Molecular Ecology10:2741-2752.
18. Garrigan, D., and P. W. Hedrick 2003. Perspective: Detecting adaptive molecular evolution, lessons from the MHC. Evolution57:1707-1722.
19. Giese, A., and P. W. Hedrick 2003. Genetic variation and resistance to a bacterial infection in the endangered Gila topminnow. Animal Conservation6:369-377.
20. Girard, C. 1859. Ichthyological notices. Proceedings of the Academy Natural Sciences Philadelphia11:113-122.
21. Hedrick, P. W. 1994. Purging inbreeding depression. Heredity73:363-372.
22. Hedrick, P. W. 2001. Conservation genetics: where are we now?Trends in Ecology and Evolution16:629-636.
23. Hedrick, P. W., and R. Fredrickson 2010. Guidelines for genetic rescue: examples from Mexican wolves and Florida panthers. Conservation Genetics11:615-626.
24. Hedrick, P. W., and S. T. Kalinowski 2000. Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annual Review Ecology and Systematics31:139-162.
25. Hedrick, P. W., and T. Kim 2000. Genetics of complex polymorphisms: parasites and maintenance of MHC variation. In R. Singh, and C. Krimbas, eds. Evolutionary Genetics: From Molecules to Morphology, pp. 204-234. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
26. Hedrick, P. W., and K. Parker 1998. MHC variation in the endangered Gila topminnow. Evolution52:194-199.
27. Hedrick, P. W., K. M. Parker, and R. Lee 2001a. Genetic variation in the endangered Gila and Yaqui topminnows: microsatellite and MHC variation. Molecular Ecology10:1399-1412.
28. Hedrick, P. W., T. Kim, and K. Parker 2001b. Parasite resistance and genetic variation in the endangered Gila topminnow. Animal Conservation4:103-109.
29. Hedrick, P. W., R. Lee, and C. Hurt 2006. The endangered Sonoran topminnow: examinations of species and ESUs using three mtDNA genes. Conservation Genetics7:483-493.
30. Hurt, C. R., and P. W. Hedrick 2003. Initial stages of reproductive isolation in two species of the endangered Sonoran topminnow. Evolution57:2835-2841.
31. Hurt, C. S. 2004. Genetic divergence, population structure, and historical demography of endangered springsnails (Pyrgulopsis) in the lower Colorado River basin. Molecular Ecology13:1173-1187.
32. Hurt, C. R., S. Stears-Ellis, K. Hughes, and P. W. Hedrick 2004. Mating behavior in the endangered Sonoran topminnow: speciation in action. Animal Behaviour67:343-351.
33. Hurt, C. R., M. Farzin, and P. W. Hedrick 2005. Premating, not postmating, barriers drive genetic dynamics in experimental hybrid populations of the endangered Sonoran topminnow. Genetics171:655-662.
34. Johnson, W. E., D. P. Onorato, M. E. Roelke, E. D. Land, M. Cunnningham, R. C. Beldon, R. McBride et al.2010. Genetic restoration of the Florida panther. Science329:1641-1645.
35. Kimura, M. 1983. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 367 pp.
36. Kirkpatrick, M., and P. Jarne 2000. The effects of a bottleneck on inbreeding depression and the genetic load. American Naturalist155:154-167.
37. Mateos, M., O. I. Sanjur, and R. C. Vrijenhoek 2002. Historical biogeography of the live bearing fish genus Poeciliopsis (Poeciliidae: Cyprinodontiformes). Evolution56:972-984.
38. McCune, A. R., and N. R. Lovejoy 1998. The relative rate of sympatric and allopatric speciation in fishes. In D. J. Howard, and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, pp. 234-244. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY.
39. Meffe, G. K., and R. C. Vrijenhoek 1988. Conservation genetics in the management of desert fishes. Conservation Biology2:157-169.
40. Melton, M. A. 1960. Origin of the drainage of southeastern Arizona. Arizona Geological Society Digest3:113-122.
41. Mendelson, T. C. 2003. Sexual isolation evolves faster than hybrid inviability in a diverse and sexually dimorphic genus of fish, Percidae: Etheostoma. Evolution57:317-327.
42. Minckley, W. L. 1969. Native Arizona fishes, part 1. Livebearers. Wildlife Views16:6-8.
43. Minckley, W. L. 1971. Keys to native and introduced fishes of Arizona. Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science6:183-188.
44. Minckley, W. L. 1999. Ecological review and management recommendations for recovery of the endangered Gila topminnow. Great Basin Naturalist59:230-244.
45. Minckley, W. L., and J. E. Deacon (eds) 1991. Battle Against Extinction. Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, 518 pp.
46. Minckley, W. L., and P. C. Marsh 2009. Inland Fishes of the Greater Southwest: Chronicle of a Vanishing Biota. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.
47. Minckley, W. L., J. N. Rinne, and J. E. Johnson 1977. Status of the Gila topminnow and its Co-occurrence with Mosquitofish. Research paper RM-198. Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO.
48. Minckley, W. L., D. A. Hendrickson, and C. E. Bond 1986. Geography of western North American freshwater fishes: description and relationships to intracontinental tectonism. In S. H. Hocutt, and E. O. Wiley, eds. Geography of Western North American Freshwater Fishes, pp. 519-613. J. Wiley, New York, NY.
49. Moritz, C. 1994. Defining "evolutionarily significant units" for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution9:373-375.
50. Moritz, C. 1999. Conservation units and translocation: strategies for conserving evolutionary processes. Hereditas130:217-228.
51. Parker, K. M., K. Hughes, T. J. Kim, and P. W. Hedrick 1998. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from the Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis o. occidentalis) and examination in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Molecular Ecology7:357-363.
52. Parker, K. M., R. J. Sheffer, and P. W. Hedrick 1999. Molecular variation and evolutionarily significant units in the endangered Gila topminnow. Conservation Biology13:108-116.
53. Quattro, J. M., and R. C. Vrijenhoek 1989. Fitness differences among remnant populations of the endangered Sonoran topminnow. Science245:976-978.
54. Quattro, J. M., P. L. Leberg, M. E. Douglas, and R. C. Vrijenhoek 1996. Molecular evidence for a unique evolutionary lineage of an endangered Sonoran Desert fish (genus Poeciliopsis). Conservation Biology10:128-135.
55. Robinson, A. T., and D. L. Ward 2011. Interactions between desert pupfish and Gila topminnow can affect reintroduction success. North American Journal of Fisheries Management31:1103-1109.
56. Schoenherr, A. A. 1977. Density dependent and density independent regulation of reproduction in the Gila topminnow, Poeciliopsis occidentalis (Baird and Girard). Ecology58:438-444.
57. Sheffer, R., P. W. Hedrick, W. Minckley, and A. Velasco 1997. Fitness in the endangered Gila topminnow. Conservation Biology11:162-171.
58. Sheffer, R. J., P. W. Hedrick, and K. Shirley 1998. No bilateral asymmetry in wild-caught endangered Gila topminnows. Heredity80:214-217.
59. Sheffer, R. J., P. W. Hedrick, and A. L. Velasco 1999. Testing for inbreeding and outbreeding depression in the endangered Gila topminnow. Animal Conservation2:121-129.
60. Sheller, F. J., W. F. Fagan, and P. J. Unmack 2006. Using survival analysis to study transloation success in the Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis occidentalis). Ecological Applications16:1771-1784.
61. Tallmon, D. A., G. Luikart, and R. S. Waples 2004. The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends in Ecology and Evolution19:489-496.
62. Vilà, C., A.-K. Sundqvist, Ø. Flagstad, J. Seddon, S. Björnerfeldt, I. Kojola, A. Casulli et al.2003. Rescue of a severely bottlenecked wolf (Canis lupus) population by a single immigrant. Proceedings Royal Society London B270:91-97.
63. Vrijenhoek, R. C., M. E. Douglas, and G. K. Meffe 1985. Conservation genetics of endangered fish populations in Arizona. Science229:400-402.
64. Vrijenhoek, R. C. 1994. Unisexual fish: models for studying ecology and evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics25:71-96.
65. Vrijenhoek, R. C. 1996. Conservation genetics of North America desert fishes. In J. C. Avise, and J. L Hamrick, eds. Conservation Genetics: Case Histories from Nature, pp. 367-397. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY.
66. Vrijenhoek, R. C. 1998. Conservation genetics of freshwater fish. Journal of Fish Biology53(Supplement A):394-412.
67. Wang, J., W. G. Hill, D. Charlesworth, and B. Charlesworth 1999. Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: mutation parameters and inbreeding rate. Genetical Research74:165-178.
68. Waples, R. S. 1995. Evolutionarily significant units and the conservation of biological diversity under the Endangered Species Act. American Fisheries Society Symposium17:8-27.