Teacher education does matter: A situative view of learning to teach secondary mathematics

Educational Psychologist

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 193-206

  Borko, Hilda ^a   Peressini, Dominic ^a   Romagnano, Lew ^c   Knuth, Eric ^b   Willis Yorker, Christine ^a   Wooley, Candace ^a   Hovermill, Jeff ^a   Masarik, Kate ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c Education Building ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034364560     PISSN: 00461520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15326985EP3503_5     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1997). Situative versus cognitive perspectives: Form versus substance. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 18-21.
2. Balacheff, N. (1991). Treatment of refutations: Aspects of the complexity of a constructivist approach to mathematics learning. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 89-110). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
3. Ball, D. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 449-466.
4. Ball, D. (1991). What's all this talk about discourse? Arithmetic Teacher 39, 44-48.
5. Ball, D. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 373-397.
6. Ball, D. L., & Mosenthal, J. H. (1990). The construction of new forms of teaching: Subject matter knowledge in in-service teacher education (Report No. 90-8). East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
7. Bell, A. W. (1976). A study of pupils' proof-explanations in mathematical situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7, 23-40.
8. Berliner, D. C. (1989). Implications of studies of expertise in pedagogy for teacher education and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 1988 Educational Testing Service Invitational Conference: New directions for teacher assessment (pp. 39-65). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
9. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673-708). New York: MacMillan.
10. Bowers, J. S. (1996). Conducting developmental research in a technology-enhanced classroom (Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 3433A.
11. Bowers, J. S., Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (1999). The evolution of mathematical practices: A case study. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 25-64.
12. Carlsen, W. (1987, April). Why do you ask? The effects of science teacher subject-matter knowledge on teacher questioning and classroom discourse. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
13. Carlsen, W. (1991). Subject-matter knowledge and science teaching: A pragmatic perspective. In J. E. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Vol. 2. Teachers' subject matter knowledge and classroom instruction (pp. 115-143). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
14. Clarke. D. (1994). Ten key principles from research for the professional development of mathematics teachers. In D. B. Aichele (Ed.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics (pp. 37-48). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
15. Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Reflective discourse and collective reflection. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 258-277.
16. Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. S. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4-15.
17. Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., Nicholls, J., Wheatley, G., Trigatti, B., & Perlwitz, M. (1991). Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 3-29.
18. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1993). Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. In E. Forman, N. Minick, & C. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 91-119). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
19. Cooney, T. (1985). A beginning teacher's view of problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16, 324-336.
20. Davis, P. (1986). The nature of proof. In M. Carss (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 352-358). Adelaide, South Australia: Unesco.
21. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-12.
22. Glickman, C. D., & Bey, T. M. (1990). Supervision. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 549-566). New York: Macmillan.
23. Greeno, J. G. (1998). Where is teaching? Issues in Education: Contributions from Cognitive Psychology, 4, 111-119.
24. Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner, & R. Calfee (Ed.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15-46). New York: Macmillan.
25. Greeno, J. G., & Middle-School Mathematics Through Applications Project (MMAP). (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5-26.
26. Grossman, P., Valencia, S., Evans, K., Jay, J., Martin, S., Place, N., & Thompson, C. (1999, April). Learning to teach writing: Conceptual and pedagogical tools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
27. Hanna, G. (1990). Some pedagogical aspects of proof. Interchange, 21, 6-13.
28. Hanna, G. (1991). Mathematical proof. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 54-61). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
29. Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students' proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. In A. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education III (pp. 234-283). Washington, DC: Mathematics Association of America.
30. Hersh, R. (1993). Some proposals for reviving the philosophy of mathematics. In T. Tymoczko (Ed.), New directions in the philosophy of mathematics (pp. 9-28). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31. Hiebert, J. (1992). Reflection and communication: Cognitive considerations in school mathematics reform. International Journal of Educational Research, 17, 439-456.
32. Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129-169.
33. Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
34. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29-63.
35. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
36. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37. Lo, J. J., Wheatley, G. H., & Smith, A. C. (1994). The participation, beliefs, and development of arithmetic meaning of a third-grade student in mathematics class discussions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(1), 30-49.
38. Maher, C., & Martino, A. (1996). The development of the idea of mathematical proof: A 5-year case study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 194-214.
39. Martin, W. G., & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 41-51.
40. McLaughlin, M., & Talbert, J. E. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning: Strategic opportunities for meeting the nation's educational goals. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching.
41. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. National Council ofTeachers ofMathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
43. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
44. National Council ofTeachers ofMathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
45. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1998). Principles and standards for school mathematics: Discussion draft. Reston, VA: Author.
46. Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion. Bristol, PA: Falmer.
47. Peressini, D., & Knuth, E. (1998). Why are you talking when you could be listening? The role of discourse in the professional development of mathematics teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 107-125.
48. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new views of cognition. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 1223-1296). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
49. Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teaching? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
50. Resnick, L. B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1-20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
51. Richards, J. (1991). Mathematical discussions. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 13-51). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
52. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education: Contributions from Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1-94.
53. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
54. Silver, E., & Smith, M. (1996). Building discourse communities in mathematics classrooms: A worthwhile but challenging journey. In P. Elliott & M. Kenney (Eds.), Communication in mathematics: K-12 and beyond (pp. 20-28). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
55. Simon, M., & Blume, G. (1996). Justification in the mathematics classroom: A study of prospective elementary teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 3-31.
56. Sykes, G., & Bird, T. (1992). Teacher education and the case idea. Review of Research in Education, 9, 457-521.
57. Voigt, J. (1995). Thematic patterns of interaction and sociomathematical norms, In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning (pp. 163-201). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
58. Wheeler, D. (1990). Aspects of mathematical proof. Interchange, 21, 1-5.
59. Wilcox, S., Schram, P., Lappan, G., & Lanier, P. (1990, April). The role of a learning community in changing preservice teachers' knowledge and beliefs about mathematics education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
60. Wineburg, S., & Grossman, P. (1998). Creating a community of learners among high school teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 350-353.
61. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458-477.