Episodic retrieval and decaying inhibition in the competitor-rule suppression phenomenon

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 141, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 316-321

  Hsieh, Shulan ^a   Chang, Chi Chih ^b   Meiran, Nachshon ^c  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Decaying inhibition; Episodic tagging; Reaction time; Suppression; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CONFLICT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867420256     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 2001, 108:624-652.
2. Brown G.D., Neath I., Chater N. A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review 2007, 114:539-576.
3. Conway A.R.A. The time-course of negative priming: Little evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Memory & Cognition 1999, 27:575-583.
4. Gade M., Koch I. Linking inhibition to activation in the control of task sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:530-534.
5. Goschke T. Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task-set switching. Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII 2000, 331-355. The MIT Press. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
6. Gratton G., Coles M.G., Donchin E. Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 1992, 121:480-506.
7. Hasher L., Zacks R.T., Stoltzfus E.R., Kane M.J., Connelly S.L. On the time course of negative priming: Another look. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1996, 3:231-237.
8. Horoufchin H., Philipp A.M., Koch I. The dissipating task-repetition benefit in cued task switching: Task-set decay or temporal distinctiveness?. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 2011, 37:455-472.
9. Horoufchin H., Philipp A.M., Koch I. Temporal distinctiveness and repetition benefits in task switching: Disentangling stimulus-related and response-related contributions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2011, 64(3):434-446.
10. Houghton G., Tipper S.P. A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. Inhibitory Processes of Attention, Memory and Language 1994, 53-112. Academic Press, Florida. D. Dagenback, T. Carr (Eds.).
11. Karayanidis F., Jamadar S., Ruge H., Phillips N., Heathcote A., Forstmann B.U. Advance preparation in task-switching: Converging evidence from behavioral, brain activation, and model-based approaches. Frontiers in Cognition 2010, 1:25. 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00025.
12. Kiesel A., Steinhauser M., Wendt M., Falkenstein M., Jost K., Philipp A.M., et al. Control and interference in task switching-A review. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:849-874.
13. Koch I., Allport A. Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching. Memory & Cognition 2006, 34:433-444.
14. Koch I., Gade M., Schuch S., Philipp A.M. The role of inhibition in task switching: a review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2010, 17:1-14.
15. Mayr S., Buchner A. Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:932-943.
16. Meiran N. Task switching: Mechanisms underlying rigid vs. flexible self control. Self control in society, mind and brain 2010, 202-220. Oxford University Press. R. Hassin, K. Ochsner, Y. Trope (Eds.).
17. Meiran N., Daichman A. Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching. Memory & Cognition 2005, 34:433-444.
18. Meiran N., Hsieh S., Chang C.C. "Smart inhibition": electrophysiological evidence for the suppression of conflict-generating task rules during task switching. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2011, 11:292-308.
19. Meiran N., Hsieh S., Dimov E. Resolving task rule incongruence during task switching by competitor rule suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:992-1002.
20. Monsell S. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7(3):134-140.
21. Neill W.T. Inhibition and facilitation processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 1977, 3:444-450.
22. Neill W.T., Mathis K.M. Transfert-inappropriate processing: Negative priming and related phenomena. The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory 1998, Vol. 38:1-44. Academic Press, San Diego.
23. Neill W.T., Terry K.M., Valdes L.A. Negative priming without probe selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1:119-121.
24. Neill W.T., Valdes L.A. Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay?. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1992, 18:565-576.
25. Neill W.T., Valdes L.A., Terry K.M. Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. Interference and inhibition in cognition 1995, 207-261. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA. F.N. Dempster, C.J. Brainerd (Eds.).
26. Neill W.T., Valdes L.A., Terry K.M., Gorfein D.S. The persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1992, 18:993-1000.
27. Neill W.T., Westberry R.L. Selective attention and the suppression of cognitive noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1987, 13:327-334.
28. Oberauer K., Lewandowsky S. Forgetting in immediate serial recall: Decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference?. Psychological Review 2008, 115:544-576.
29. Schneider W., Eschman A., Zuccolotto A. E-prime user's guide 2002, Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh, PA.
30. Schneider D.W., Verbruggen F. Inhibition of irrelevant category-response mappings. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61:1629-1640.
31. Tipper S.P. The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1985, 37:571-590.
32. Tipper S.P. Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A 2001, 54:321-343.
33. Tipper S.P., Brehaut J.C., Driver J. Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 1990, 16:492-504.
34. Tipper S.P., Cranston M. Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1985, 37A:591-611.
35. Tipper S.P., Weaver B., Houghton G. Behavioural goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1994, 47A:809-840.
36. Vandierendonck A., Liefooghe B., Verbruggen F. Task switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:601-626.