Immobilization/stabilization of acid urease on Eupergit® supports

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1232-1244

  Bortone, Nadia ^a   Fidaleo, Marcello ^a   Moresi, Mauro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Apparent Michaelis constant; Eupergit C and C 250 L supports; Free or immobilized acid urease; Internal effectiveness factor; Observable Thiele modulus; Particle grinding; Thermal and storage stability; Urea degradation kinetics

Indexed keywords

DEGRADATION KINETICS; EFFECTIVENESS FACTOR; FREE OR IMMOBILIZED ACID UREASE; MICHAELIS CONSTANTS; STORAGE STABILITY; THIELE MODULUS;

DEGRADATION; GRINDING (MACHINING); IONIC STRENGTH; METABOLISM; RATE CONSTANTS; UREA;

ENZYME IMMOBILIZATION;

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; EPOXIDE; IMMOBILIZED ENZYME; UREA; UREASE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; ENZYME STABILITY; ENZYMOLOGY; HEAT; KINETICS; LACTOBACILLUS FERMENTUM; PH; TEMPERATURE;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; ENZYME STABILITY; ENZYMES, IMMOBILIZED; EPOXY COMPOUNDS; HOT TEMPERATURE; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; KINETICS; LACTOBACILLUS FERMENTUM; TEMPERATURE; UREA; UREASE;

BOVINAE;

EID: 84867401251     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.1598     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Mateo C, Palomo JM, Fernandez-Lorente G, Guisan JM, Fernandez-Lafuente R. Improvement of enzyme activity, stability and selectivity via immobilization techniques. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2007; 40: 1451-1463.
2. Grazù V, López-Gallego F, Montes T, Abian O, González R, Hermoso JA, García JL, Mateo C, Guisán JM. Promotion of multipoint covalent immobilisation through different regions of genetically modified penicillin G acylase from E. coli. Process Biochem. 2010; 45: 390-398.
3. Hernaiz MJ, Crout DHG. Immobilization/stabilization on Eupergit C of the β-galactosidase from B. circulans and an α-galactosidase from Aspergillus oryzae. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2000; 27: 26-32.
4. Handa T, Hirosa A, Yoshida S, Tsuchiya H. The effect of methylacrylate on the activity of glucoamylase immobilized on granular polyacrylonitrile. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1982; 24: 1639-1652.
5. Krajewska B. Ureases II. Properties and their customizing by enzyme immobilizations: a review. J Mol Catal B: Enzym. 2009; 59: 22-40.
6. Bailey JE, Ollis DF. Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.; 1986: 133-135, 205-206, 227.
7. Krajewska B. Ureases I. Functional, catalytic and kinetic properties: a review. J Mol Catal B: Enzym. 2009; 59: 9-21.
8. Schlatter J, Lutz WK. The carcinogenic potential of ethyl carbamate (urethane): risk assessment at human dietary exposure levels. Food Chem Toxicol. 1990; 28: 205-211.
9. Butzke CE, Bisson LF. Ethyl carbamate preventative action manual, Food and Drug Administration. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, published on line at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/FoodSafety/FoodContaminantsAdulteration/ChemicalContaminants/EthylCarbamateUrethane/UCM119802.pdf?utm_campaign=Google2&utm_source=fdaSearch&utm_medium=website&utm_term=ethylcarbamate&utm_content=3.
10. Matsumoto K. Removal of urea from alcoholic beverages by immobilised acid urease. Bioprocess Technol. 1993; 16: 255-273.
11. Zhou J, Chen S, Wang J. Research on orientedly immobilised urease via Concanavalin A. Chin J Biotechnol. 2008; 24: 617-621.
12. Selvamurugan C, Lavanya A, Sivasankar B. A comparative study on immobilisation of urease on different matrices. J Sci Ind Res. 2007; 66: 655-659.
13. Andrich L, Esti M, Moresi M. Urea degradation in model wine solutions by free or immobilized acid urease in a stirred bioreactor. J Agric Food Chem. 2009; 57: 3533-3542.
14. Andrich L, Esti M, Moresi M. Urea degradation in some white wines by immobilized acid urease in a stirred bioreactor. J Agric Food Chem. 2010; 58: 6747-6753.
15. Katchalski-Kazir E, Kraemer DM. Eupergit® C, a carrier for immobilization of enzymes of industrial potential. J Mol Catal B: Enzym. 2000; 10: 157-176.
16. Boller T, Meier C, Menzler S. Eupergit oxirane acrylic beads: how to make enzymes fit for biocatalysis. Org Process Res Dev. 2002; 6: 509-519.
17. Gómez de Segura A, Alcalde M, Yates M, Rojas-Cervantes ML, López-Cortés N, Ballesteros A, Plou FJ. Immobilization of dextransucrose from Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRRL B-512F on Eupergit C supports. Biotechnol Prog. 2004; 20: 1414-1420.
18. Spieβ A, Schlothauer R-C, Hinrichs J, Scheidat B, Kasche V. pH gradients in immobilized amidases and their influence on rates and yields of β-lactam hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999; 62: 267-277.
19. Sundberg L.; Porath J. Preparation of adsorbents for biospecific affinity chromatography. 1 Attachment of group-containing ligands to insoluble polymers by means of bifunctional oxiranes. J Chromatogr. 1974; 90: 87-98.
20. Bradford MM. Rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976; 72: 248-254.
21. Mateo C, Fernández-Lorente G, Abian O, Fernández-Lafuente R, Guisán JM. Multifunctional epoxy supports: a new tool to improve the covalent immobilization of proteins. The promotion of physical adsorptions of proteins on the supports before their covalent linkage. Biomacromolecules 2000; 1: 739-745.
22. Bolleter WT, Bushman CJ, Tidwell PW. Spectrophotometric determination of ammonia as indophenol. Anal Chem. 1961; 33: 592-594.
23. Fernández-Lafuente R, Rodríguez V, Mateo C, Penzol G, Hernández-Justiz O, Irazoqui G, Villarino A, Ovsejevi K, Batista F, Guisán JM. Stabilization of multimeric enzymes via immobilization and post-immobilization techniques. J Mol Catal B: Enzym. 1999; 181-189.
24. Wheatley JB, Schmidt DEJr. Salt-induced immobilization of affinity ligands onto epoxide-activated supports. J Chromatogr A. 1999; 849: 1-12.
25. Mateo C, Abian O, Fernández-Lafuente R, Guisán JM. Increase in conformational stability of enzymes immobilized on epoxy-activated supports by favoring additional multipoint covalent attachment. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2000; 26: 509-515.
26. Aymard C, Belarbi A. Kinetics of thermal deactivation of enzymes: a simple three parameters phenomenological model can describe the decay of enzyme activity, irrespectively of the mechanism. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2000; 27: 612-618.
27. Kakimoto S, Sumino Y, Kawahara K, Yamazaki Y, Nakatsui I. Purification and characterization of acid urease from Lactobacillus fermentum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1990; 32: 538-543.
28. Erickson HP. Size and shape of protein molecules at the nanometer level determined by sedimentation, gel filtration, and electron microscopy. Biol Proced Online. 2009; 11: 32-51.
29. Qin Y, Cabral JMS. Properties and application of urease. Biocatal Biotransform. 2002; 20: 1-14.
30. Fidaleo M, Lavecchia R. Kinetic study of enzymatic urea hydrolysis in the pH range 4-9. Chem Biochem Eng Q. 2003; 17: 311-318.
31. Moynihan HJ, Lee CK, Clark W, Wang NHL. Urea hydrolysis by immobilized urease in a fixed-bed reactor: analysis and kinetic parameter estimation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1989; 34: 951-963.
32. Krajewska B, Chudy M, Drozdek M, Zbigniew Brzózka Z. Potentiometric study of urease kinetics over pH 5.36-8.21. Electroanalysis. 2003; 15: 460-466.
33. Clark DS, Bailey JE. Structure-function relationships in immobilised chymotrypsin catalysis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1983; 25: 1027-1047.
34. Schwartzberg HG, Chao RY. Solute diffusivities in leaching processes. Food Technol. 1982; 36: 73-86.
35. Tischer W, Wedekind F. Immobilized enzymes: methods and applications. Top Curr Chem. 1999; 200: 95-126.
36. Tischer W, Kasche V. Immobilized enzymes: crystals or carriers? Trends Biotechnol. 1999; 17: 326-335.
37. Satterfield CN, Sherwood TK. The role of diffusion in catalysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publ. Co.; 1963: 47.
38. Aunins JG, Woodson BAJr, Hale TK, Wang DIC. Effects of paddle impeller geometry on power input and mass transfer in small-scale animal cell culture vessels. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1989; 34: 1127-1132.
39. Asai S, Konishi Y, Sasaki Y. Mass transfer between fine particles and liquids in agitated vessels. J Chem Eng Jpn. 1998; 21: 107-112.