Creativity and interdisciplinarity: One creativity or many creativities?

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 41, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 5-11

  Plucker, Jonathan ^a   Zabelina, Dasha ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Creativity; Domain generality; Domain specificity; Problem solving

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867374506     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-008-0155-3     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Achter, J. A., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1996). Multipotentiality among the intellectually gifted: It was never there and already it's vanishing. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 65-76.
2. Achter, J. A., Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (1997). Rethinking multipotentiality among the intellectually gifted: A critical review and recommendations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 5-15.
3. Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
4. Baer, J. (1994). Why you shouldn't trust creativity tests. Educational Leadership, 51, 80-83.
5. Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173-177.
6. Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Talent development in an age of situated approaches to learning and thinking. Educational Psychologist, 37, 165-182.
7. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Creativity: Shifting across ontological categories flexibly. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 209-234). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325-339). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domains of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190-214). London: Sage.
10. Dollinger, S. J., & Shafran, M. (2005). Note on consensual assessment technique in creativity research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 592-598.
11. Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to expert performance: Empirical evidence from the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1-50). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
13. Gardner, H. (1988). Creative lives and creative works: A synthetic scientific approach. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 298-324). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
15. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Helson, R. (2008). One surprise after another. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 205-214.
17. Hocevar, D. (1976). Dimensionality of creativity. Psychological Reports, 39, 869-870.
18. Holland, J. L., & Nichols, R. C. (1964). Prediction of academic and extracurricular achievement in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 55-65.
19. Holland, J. L., & Richards, J. M., Jr. (1965). Academic and nonacademic accomplishment: Correlated or uncorrelated? Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 165-174.
20. Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 389-403.
21. Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). Hawking's haiku, Madonna's math: Why it is hard to be creative in every room of the house. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 3-19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22. Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2005). The amusement park theory of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 321-328). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the consensual assessment technique. Creativity Research Journal (in press).
24. Kerr, B. A. (1985). Smart girls, gifted women. Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press.
25. Kerr, B. (1991). A handbook for counseling the gifted and talented. Alexandria: American Association for Counseling and Development.
26. Kogan, N. (1994). Diverging from divergent thinking (Review of the book Divergent thinking and creativity: A task specific approach). Contemporary Psychology, 39, 291-292.
27. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121-1134.
28. Legree, P. J., Pifer, M. E., & Grafton, F. C. (1996). Correlations among cognitive abilities are lower for high ability groups. Intelligence, 23, 54-57.
29. Lim, W., & Plucker, J. (2001). Creativity through a lens of social responsibility: Implicit theories of creativity with Korean samples. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 115-130.
30. Lin, C., Hu, W., Adey, P., & Shen, J. (2003). The influence of CASE on scientific creativity. Research in Science Education, 33, 143-162.
31. Lubinski, D. & Benbow, C. P. (2000). States of excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 137-150.
32. Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Ryan, J. (1995). Stability of vocational interests among the intellectually gifted from adolescence to adulthood: A 15-year longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 90-94.
33. Milgram, R. M., & Hong, E. (1999). Multipotential abilities and vocational interests in gifted adolescents: Fact or fiction? International Journal of Psychology, 34, 81-93.
34. Milgram, R. M., & Livne, N. L. (2005). Creativity as a general and a domain-specific ability: The domain of mathematics as an exemplar. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 187-204). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2008). The role of the family in talent development. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psycho-educational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 53-70). New York: Springer.
36. Pask-McCartney, C., & Salomone, P. R. (1988). Difficult cases in career counseling: III. The multipotentialed client. Career Development Quarterly, 36, 231-240.
37. Piirto, J. (2005). The creative process in poets. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 1-22). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Plucker, J. A. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for content generality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 179-182.
39. Plucker, J. A. (1999). Reanalyses of student responses to creativity checklists: Evidence of content generality. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 126-137.
40. Plucker, J. A. (2005). The (relatively) generalist view of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 307-312). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Plucker, J., & Barab, S. A. (2005). The importance of contexts in theories of giftedness: Learning to embrace the messy joys of subjectivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. A. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 201-216). New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Plucker, J., & Beghetto, R. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153-167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
43. Plucker, J., & Stocking, V. (2001). Looking outside and inside: Selfconcept development of gifted adolescents. Exceptional Children, 67, 535-548.
44. Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologists, 39, 83-96.
45. Plucker, J. A., Kaufman, J. C., Temple, J. S., & Qian, M. (2008). Do experts and novices evaluate movies the same way? Psychology & Marketing (in press).
46. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184, 261.
47. Renzulli, J. S. (1988). Technical report of research studies related to the Revolving Door Identification Model (2nd ed., Vol. II). Storrs, CT: Bureau of Educational Research and Service. The University of Connecticut.
48. Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
49. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center: Creative Learning Press.
50. Robinson, N. M. (1997). The role of universities and colleges in educating gifted undergraduates. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 217-236.
51. Runco, M. A., & Bahleda, M. D. (1986). Implicit theories of artistic, scientific, and everyday creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 93-98.
52. Runco, M. A., & Vega, L. (1990). Evaluating the creativity of children's ideas. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 439-452.
53. Runco, M. A., Johnson, D. J., & Bear, P. K. (1993). Parents' and teachers' implicit theories of children's creativity. Child Study Journal, 23, 91-113.
54. Runco, M. A., McCarthy, K. A., & Svenson, E. (1994). Judgments of the creativity of artwork from students and professional artists. The Journal of Psychology, 128, 23-31.
55. Rysiew, K. J., Shore, B. M., & Leeb, R. T. (1999). Multipotentiality, giftedness, and career choice: A review. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77, 423-430.
56. Simonton, D. K. (2002). Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology's history. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
57. Simonton, D. K. (2005). Creativity in psychology: On becoming and being a great psychologist. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 139-151). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated Publishers.
58. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607-627.
59. Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The domain generality versus specificity debate: How should it beposed? In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 299-306). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
60. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (1995). The nature of insight. Cambridge: MIT Press.
61. Tardif, T. Z., & Sternberg, R. J. (1988). What do we know about creativity? In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 429-440). New York: Cambridge University Press.
62. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Normstechnical manual. Lexington: Ginn.
63. Weisberg, R. Q. (1993). Creativity beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.