The domain generality versus specificity debate: How should it be posed?

Creativity Across Domains: Faces of the Muse

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 299-306

  Sternberg, Robert J ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917381305     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611925     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Carroll, J.B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
3. Gardner, H. (1999). Multiple approaches to understanding. In C.M.Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructionaldesign theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Vol. II (pp. 69-89). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Guilford, J.P. (1982). Is some creative thinking irrational? Journal of Creative Behavior, 16, 151-154.
5. Lohman, D.F. (2000). Complex information processing and intelligence. In R.J.Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 285-340). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Lubart, T.I., & Steinberg, R.J. (1995). An investment approach to creativity: Theory and data. In S.M.Smith, T.B.Ward, & R.A.Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 269-302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Rumelhart, D.E., & Abrahamson, A.A. (1973). A model for analogical reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 1-28.
8. Shepard, R.N. (1969). The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. Psychometrika, 27, 125-140.
9. Silverman, I., & Eals, M. (1992). The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: Proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 95-105.
10. Sternberg, R.J. (1989). Domain-generality versus domain-specificity: The life and impending death of a false dichotomy. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 35, 115-130.
11. Sternberg, R.J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.
12. Sternberg, R.J. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292-316.
13. Sternberg, R.J. (2003). Construct validity of the theory of successful intelligence. In R.J.Sternberg, J.Lautrey, & T.I.Lubart (Eds.), Models of intelligence for the new millennium (pp. 55-80). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14. Sternberg, R.J., & Spear-Swerling, L. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on learning disabilities: Biological, cognitive, contextual. Boulder, CO: Westview.
15. Sternberg, R.J., Tourangeau, R., & Nigro, G. (1979). Metaphor, induction, and social policy: The convergence of macroscopic and microscopic views. In A.Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 325-353). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Thurstone, L.L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Torrance, E.P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.
18. Tourangeau, R., & Sternberg, R.J. (1981). Aptness in metaphor. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 27-55.
19. Tourangeau, R., & Sternberg, R.J. (1982). Understanding and appreciating metaphors. Cognition, 11, 203-244.
20. Tversky, A., & Gati, I. (1978). Studies of similarity. In E.Rosch & B.Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 79-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.