Comparative study of pressure- and volume-controlled ventilation on stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery

Journal of Critical Care

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 531.e9-531.e14

  Lee, Ji Yeon ^a   Park, Hee Yeon ^a   Jung, Wol Seon ^a   Jo, Youn Yi ^a   Kwak, Hyun Jeong ^a  

^a Gachon University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Fluid responsiveness; Stroke volume variation; Ventilation mode

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CALCULATION; COLLOID; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; PRESSURE CONTROLLED VENTILATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULSE OXIMETRY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; VENTILATOR; VOLUME CONTROLLED VENTILATION;

EID: 84867337960     PISSN: 08839441     EISSN: 15578615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.11.012     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Grocott M.P., Mythen M.G., Gan T.J. Perioperative fluid management and clinical outcomes in adults. Anesth Analg 2005, 100:1093-1106.
2. Gan T.J., Soppitt A., Maroof M., et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 2002, 97:820-826.
3. Noblett S.E., Snowden C.P., Shenton B.K., et al. Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2006, 93:1069-1076.
4. Wakeling H.G., McFall M.R., Jenkins C.S., et al. Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth 2005, 95:634-642.
5. Marik P.E., Baram M., Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008, 134:172-178.
6. Michard F., Boussat S., Chemla D., et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000, 162:134-138.
7. Derichard A., Robin E., Tavernier B., et al. Automated pulse pressure and stroke volume variations from radial artery: evaluation during major abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2009, 103:678-684.
8. Hofer C.K., Senn A., Weibel L., et al. Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac and PiCCOplus system. Crit Care 2008, 12:R82.
9. Reuter D.A., Goresch T., Goepfert M.S., et al. Effects of mid-line thoracotomy on the interaction between mechanical ventilation and cardiac filling during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2004, 92:808-813.
10. Davis K., Branson R., Campbell R.S., et al. Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation: is flow waveform the differences?. J Trauma 1996, 41:808-814.
11. Fonseca E.B., Otsuki D.A., Fantoni D.T., et al. Comparative study of pressure- and volume-controlled ventilation on pulse pressure variation in a model of hypovolaemia in rabbits. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008, 25:388-394.
12. Manecke G.R. Edwards FloTrac sensor and Vigileo monitor: easy, accurate, reliable cardiac output assessment using the arterial pulse wave. Expert Rev Med Devices 2005, 2:523-527.
13. Cannesson M., Musard H., Desebbe O., et al. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2009, 108:513-517.
14. Zimmermann M., Feibicke T., Keyl C., et al. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010, 27:555-561.
15. Wagner J.G., Leatherman J.W. Right ventricular end-diastolic volume as a predictor of the hemodynamic response to a fluid challenge. Chest 1998, 113:1048-1054.
16. Michard F., Teboul J.L. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002, 121:2000-2008.
17. Tuǧrul M., Camci E., Karadeniz H., et al. Comparison of volume controlled with pressure controlled ventilation during one-lung anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1997, 79:306-310.
18. Benes J., Chytra I., Altmann P., et al. Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study. Crit Care 2010, 14:R118.
19. Reuter D.A., Bayerlein J., Goepfert M.S., et al. Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2003, 29:476-480.
20. de Wilde R.B., Geerts B.F., van den Berg P.C., et al. A comparison of stroke volume variation measured by the LiDCOplus and FloTrac-Vigileo system. Anaesthesia 2009, 64:1004-1009.
21. Oǧurlu M., Küçük M., Bilgin F., et al. Pressure-controlled vs volume-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010, 17:295-300.
22. Tyagi A., Kumar R., Sethi A.K., Mohta M. A comparison of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anaesthesia 2011, 66:503-508.
23. Marini J.J., Crooke P.S. A general mathematical model for respiratory dynamics relevant to the clinical setting. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993, 147:14-24.
24. Magder S. Clinical usefulness of respiratory variations in arterial pressure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004, 169:151-155.
25. Pinsky M.R. Recent advances in the clinical application of heart-lung interactions. Curr Opin Crit Care 2002, 8:26-31.
26. Mayer J., Boldt J., Schöllhorn T., et al. Semi-invasive monitoring of cardiac output by a new device using arterial pressure waveform analysis: a comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007, 98:176-182.
27. de Waal E.E., Kalkman C.J., Rex S., et al. Validation of a new arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device. Crit Care Med 2007, 35:1904-1909.
28. Jo Y.Y., Song J.W., Yoo Y.C., et al. The uncalibrated pulse contour cardiac output during off-pump coronary bypass surgery: performance in patients with a low cardiac output status and a reduced left ventricular function. Korean J Anesthesiol 2011, 60:237-243.
29. Wyffels P.A., Sergeant P., Wouters P.F. The value of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness during open chest surgery. Anaesthesia 2010, 65:704-709.