Comparative study of pressure- and volume-controlled ventilation on pulse pressure variation in a model of hypovolaemia in rabbits

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 388-394

  Fonseca, E B ^a   Otsuki, D A ^a   Fantoni, D T ^a   Bliacheriene, F ^a   Auler, J O C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular physiology; Hypovolaemia; Intermittent positive pressure ventilation; Pulse pressure variation; Rabbits

Indexed keywords

PROPOFOL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD VOLUME; CARDIOVASCULAR FUNCTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HYPOVOLEMIA; NONHUMAN; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PULSE PRESSURE; RABBIT; RESIDUAL VOLUME; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

EID: 41549150868     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0265021508003554     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Michard F, Lopes MR, Auler JO. Pulse pressure variation: beyond the fluid management of patients with shock. Crit Care 2007; 11: 131.
2. Lopes MR, Auler JOC, Michard F. Volume management in critically ill patients: new insights. Clinics 2006; 61: 345-350.
3. Bliacheriene F, Machado SB, Fonseca EB, Otsuki D, Auler Jr JOC, Michard F. Pulse pressure variation as a tool to detect hypovolaemia during pneumoperitoneum. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51: 1268-1272.
4. Perel A, Pizov R, Cotev S. Systolic blood pressure variation is a sensitive indicator of hypovolemia in ventilated dogs subjected to graded hemorrhage. Anesthesiology 1987; 67: 498-502.
5. Michard F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 419-428.
6. Pinsky MR. Assessment of indices of preload and volume responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005; 11: 235-239.
7. Pinsky MR. The hemodynamic consequences of mechanical ventilation: an evolving story. Intensive Care Med 1997; 23: 493-503.
8. Perel A. The value of delta down during haemorrhage. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83: 967-968.
9. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134-138.
10. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 746-755.
11. Davis K, Branson RD, Campbell RS, Porembka DT. Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation: Is flow waveform the difference? J Trauma 1996; 41: 808-814.
12. Michard F, Chemla D, Richard C et al. Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159: 935-939.
13. Perel A, Minkovich L, Preisman S, Abiad M, Segal E, Coriat P. Assessing fluid-responsiveness by a standardized ventilatory maneuver: the respiratory systolic variation test. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 942-945.
14. De Baker D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 517-523.
15. Charron C, Fessenmeyer C, Cosson C et al. The influence of tidal volume on the dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 1511-1517.
16. Magder S. Clinical usefulness of respiratory variations in arterial pressure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 169: 151-155.
17. Cournand A, Motley HL, Werko Jr L, Richards DW. Physiological studies of the effects of intermittent positive pressure breathing on cardiac output in man. Am J Physiol 1948; 152: 162-174.
18. Robotham JL, Rabson J, Permutt S, Bromberger-Barnea B. Left ventricular hemodynamics during respiration. J Appl Physiol 1979; 47: 1295-1303.
19. Robotham JL, Lixfeld W, Holland L et al. The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on right and left ventricular performance. Am Rev Respir Dis 1980; 121: 677-683.
20. Bromberger-Barnea B. Mechanical effects of inspiration on heart functions. Fed Proc 1981; 40: 2172-2177.
21. Scharf SM, Caldini P, Ingram RH. Cardiovascular effects of increasing airway pressure in the dog. Am J Physiol 1977; 232: H35-H43.
22. Denault AY, Gastor TA, Goresan JI, Mandarino WA, Deneault LG, Pinsky MR. Determinants of aortic pressure variation during positive pressure ventilation in man. Chest 1999; 116: 176-186.
23. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134-138.
24. Chemla D, Hebert JL, Coirault C et al. Total arterial compliance estimated by stroke volume-to-aortic pulse pressure ratio in humans. Am J Physiol 1998; 274: H500-H505.
25. Jardin F, Farcot JC, Gueret P, Prost JF, Ozier Y, Bourdarias JP. Cyclic changes in arterial pulse during respiratory support. Circulation 1983; 68: 266-274.