Establishing a CT colonography service

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 379-398

  Cash, Brooks D ^a,b  

^a Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences   (United States)

^b WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Colon cancer screening; CT colonography; Medical practice

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL SERVICE; POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REIMBURSEMENT; REVIEW; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MASS SCREENING; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RADIOGRAPHY; UNITED STATES;

COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MASS SCREENING; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; PROGRAM EVALUATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77952579559     PISSN: 10525157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.02.016     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Levin B., Lieberman D.A., McFarland B., et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008, 58(3):130-160.
2. Pickhardt P.J., Choi J.R., Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003, 349:2191-2200.
3. Johnson C.D., Chen M.H., Toledano A.Y., et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and polyps. N Engl J Med 2008, 359:1207-1217.
4. Graser A., Stieber P., Nagel D., et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and fecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenomas in an average risk population. Gut 2009, 58:241-248.
5. Regge D., Laude C., Galatola G., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computerized tomographic colonography for the detection of advance neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA 2009, 301:2453-2461.
6. Rex D.K., Johnson D.A., Anderson J.C., et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2008. Am J Gastroenterol 2009, 104(3):739-750.
7. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Decision memo for screening computed tomography colonography (CTC) for colorectal cancer (CAG-00396N) Available at:, Accessed June 4, 2009. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewdecisionmemo.asp?id=220.
8. Dhruva S., Phurrough S.E., Salive M.E., et al. CMS' landmark decision on CT colonography-examining the relevant data. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:2699-2701.
9. Marks D.H. Blue cross blue shield technology evaluation center assessment of CTC TEC assessment program Available at:, 24:1-26. Accessed September 1, 2009. http://www.bcbs.com/blueresources/tec/vols/24/ct-colonography-virtual.html.
10. Available at:, Accessed September 1, 2009. http://www.bethesda.med.navy.mil/patient/health_care/medical_services/gastroenterology/gastroproser.aspx.
11. Zalis M.E., Barish M.A., Choi J.R., et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005, 236:3-9.
12. Shinners T.J., Pickhardt P.J., Taylor A.J., et al. Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 186:1491-1496.
13. Burling D., Taylor S.A., Halligan S., et al. Automated insufflation of carbon dioxide for MDCT colonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 186:96-103.
14. Young B.M., Fletcher J.G., Earnest F., et al. Colonic perforation at CT colonography in a patient without known colonic disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 186:119-121.
15. Hara A.K., Johnson C.D., MacCarty R.L., et al. CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology 2001, 219:461-465.
16. Kalra M.K., Naz N., Rizzo S.M., et al. Computed tomography radiation dose optimization: scanning protocols and clinical applications of automatic exposure control. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2005, 34:171-181.
17. Kalra M.K., Rizzo S.M., Novelline R.A. Reducing radiation dose in emergency computed tomography with automatic exposure control techniques. Emerg Radiol 2005, 11:267-274.
18. Laghi A., Lannaccone R., Panebianco V., et al. Multislice CT colonography: technical developments. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2001, 22:425-431.
19. Taylor S.A., Halligan S., Bartram C.I., et al. Multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of collimation, pitch, and orientation on polyp detection in a human colectomy specimen. Radiology 2003, 229:109-118.
20. Wessling J., Fischbach R., Meier N., et al. CT colonography: protocol optimization with multi-detector row CT-study in an anthropomorphic colon phantom. Radiology 2003, 228:753-759.
21. Yee J., Akerkar G.A., Hung R.K., et al. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 2001, 219:685-692.
22. Laghi A., Iannaccone R., Carbone I., et al. Detection of colorectal lesions with virtual computed tomographic colonography. Am J Surg 2002, 183:124-131.
23. ACR practice guideline for the performance of computed tomography (CT) colonography in adults. ACR Practice Guideline 2005, 29:295-299. Radiology ACo., 2002 (Res. 2).
24. Tolan D.J., Armstrong E.M., Burling D., et al. Optimization of CT colonography technique: a practical guide. Clin Radiol 2007, 62(9):819-827.
25. Dachman A.H., Kelly K.B., Zintsmaster M.P., et al. Formative evaluation of standardized training for CT colonographic image interpretation by novice readers. Radiology 2008, 249:167-177.
26. Young P.E., Ray Q.P., Hwang I., et al. Gastroenterologists' interpretation of CTC: a pilot study demonstrating feasibility and similar accuracy compared with radiologists' interpretation. Am J Gastroenterol 2009, 104(12):2926-2931.
27. ACR practice guideline for the performance of computed tomography (CT) colonography in adults Available at:, Accessed September 15, 2009. http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/dx/gastro/ct_colonography.aspx.
28. Rockey D.C., Barish M., Brill J.V., et al. Standards for gastroenterologists for performing and interpreting diagnostic computed tomographic colonography. Gastroenterology 2007, 133:1005-1024.
29. Available at:, Accessed September 15, 2009. https://nrdr.acr.org/portal/CTC/Main/page.aspx.
30. 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b) Available at:, Accessed September 15, 2009. http://www.aaasc.org/advocacy/documents/WDC99_937585_1.PDF.
31. 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b). United States Code: Title 42, 1320a-7b. Criminal penalties for acts involving Federal health care programs and 42 USC §1395nn, United States Code: Title 42, 1395nn, Limitation on certain physician referrals Available at:, Accessed September 15, 2009. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/no-index/physician-resources/3882.shtml.
32. United States Code: Title 42, 411.351. Financial relationships between physicians and entities furnishing designated health services. Definitions. Available at: Accessed March 10, 2010. http://www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/retrieve.html.
33. United States Code: Title 42, 411.351. Financial relationships between physicians and entities furnishing designated health services. Financial relationship, compensation, and ownership or investment interest. Available at: Accessed March 10, 2010. http://www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/retrieve.html.
34. Dachman A.H., Kuniyoshi J.K., Boyle C.M., et al. CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998, 171:989-995.
35. Macari M., Milano A., Lavelle M., et al. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000, 174:1543-1549.
36. Barish M.A., Soto J.A., Ferrucci J.T. Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005, 184:786-792.
37. Pickhardt P.J. Three-dimensional endoluminal CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): comparison of three commercially available systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003, 181:1599-1606.
38. Cotton P.B., Durkalski V.L., Pineau B.C., et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004, 291:1713-1719.
39. McFarland E.G., Brink J.A., Pilgram T.K., et al. Spiral CT colonography: reader agreement and diagnostic performance with two- and three-dimensional image-display techniques. Radiology 2001, 218:375-383.
40. Macari M., Bini E.J., Xue X., et al. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology 2002, 224:383-392.
41. Fidler J.L., Johnson C.D., MacCarty R.L., et al. Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2002, 27:292-300.
42. Pickhardt P.J., Lee A.D., McFarland E.G., et al. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays. Radiology 2005, 236:872-878.
43. Young B.M., Fletcher J.G., Paulsen S.R., et al. Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007, 188:122-129.
44. United States Code: Title 42, 411.351. Financial relationships between physicians and entities furnishing designated health services. Exceptions to the referral prohibition related to compensation arrangements; subparts (d) Personal service arrangements and (l) Fair market value compensation. Available at: Accessed March 10, 2010. http://www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/retrieve.html.
45. Fajardo L.L., Hurley J.P., Brown B.P., et al. Business plan to establish a CT colonography service. J Am Coll Radiol 2006, 3:175-186.
46. Pickhardt P.J., Taylor A.J., Kim D.H., et al. Screening for colorectal neoplasia with CT colonography: initial experience from the 1st year of coverage by third-party payers. Radiology 2006, 241(2):417-425.
47. Pickhardt P.J., Hassan C., Laghi A., et al. CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 192(5):1332-1340.
48. Heresbach D., Chauvin P., Hess-Migliorretti A., et al. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography according to a polyp size threshold for polypectomy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009, [Epub ahead of print].
49. Vijan S., Hwang I., Inadomi J., et al. The cost-effectiveness of CT colonography in screening for colorectal neoplasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2007, 102(2):380-390.
50. Lansdorp-Vogelaar I., van Ballegooijen M., Zauber A.G., et al. At what costs will screening with CT colonography be competitive? A cost-effectiveness approach. Int J Cancer 2009, 124(5):1161-1168.
51. Available at:, Accessed September 15, 2009. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/no-index/physician-resources/3882.shtml.
52. Federal Register, 2001;66:55269. Available at: l. Accessed March 10, 2010. http://www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/retrieve.htm.
53. Knechtges P.M., McFarland B.G., Keysor K.J., et al. National and local trends in CT colonography reimbursement: past, present, and future. J Am Coll Radiol 2007, 4:776-799.
54. Van Dam J., Cotton P., Johnson C.D., et al. AGA future trends report: CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2004, 127:970-984.
55. Rex D.K. PRO: patients with polyps smaller than 1 cm on computed tomographic colonography should be offered colonoscopy and polypectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2005, 100:1903-1905.
56. Ransohoff D.F. CON: immediate colonoscopy is not necessary in patients who have polyps smaller than 1 cm on computed tomographic colonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2005, 100:1905-1907.
57. Winawer S.J., Zauber A.G., Fletcher R.H., et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 2006, 130:1872-1885.
58. Taylor S.A., Laghi A., Lefere P., et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2007, 17:575-579.
59. Rex D.K., Lieberman D. ACG colorectal cancer prevention action plan: update on CT colonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:1410-1413.
60. Xiong T., Richardson M., Woodroffe R., et al. Incidental lesions found on CT colonography: their nature and frequency. Br J Radiol 2005, 78:22-29.
61. Hara A.K., Johnson C.D., MacCarty R.L., et al. Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology 2000, 215:353-357.
62. Gluecker T.M., Johnson C.D., Wilson L.A., et al. Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2003, 124:911-916.
63. Miao Y.M., Amin Z., Healy J., et al. A prospective single centre study comparing computed tomography pneumocolon against colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal neoplasms. Gut 2000, 47:832-837.
64. Robinson P., Burnett H., Nicholson D.A. The use of minimal preparation computed tomography for the primary investigation of colon cancer in frail or elderly patients. Clin Radiol 2002, 57:389-392.
65. Structural shielding design for medical x-ray imaging 2004, 147 NRN., National Council for Radiation Protection & Measurements, Bethesda (MD), p. 20814-30945.
66. Johnson C., Swensen S., Applegate K., et al. Quality improvement in radiology: White Paper report of the Sun Valley Group Meeting. J Am Coll Radiol 2006, 3:544-549.
67. Swensen S.J., Johnson C.D. Radiologic quality and safety: mapping value into radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2005, 2:992-1000.
68. Moser J.W., Wilcox P.A., Bjork S.S., et al. Pay for performance in radiology: ACR White Paper. J Am Coll Radiol 2006, 3:650-664.
69. Limburg P.J., Fletcher J.G. Making sense of CT colonography-related complication rates. Gastroenterology 2006, 131:2023-2024.
70. Pickhardt PJ, Baumel MJ, Cash BD, et al. Implementation of CT colonography screening: multi-center evaluation of patient attitudes and effect on colonoscopy screening volumes. Presented at the 10th International VC Symposium. Washington, DC, October 26-28, 2009.
71. Pickhardt PJ, Meiners RJ, Wyatt K, et al. Colorectal and extracolonic cancers detected at CT colonography screening in over 10,286 asymptomatic adults. Radiology, in press.