Magnetic resonance colonography for colorectal cancer screening in patients with Lynch syndrome gene mutation

Familial Cancer

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 555-561

  Lim, Eu Jin ^a   Leung, Christopher ^a   Pitman, Alex ^b   Stella, Damien L ^a   Brown, Gregor ^a   Slattery, Masha ^a   Marion, Kaye ^c   Macrae, Finlay ^a  

^a ROYAL MELBOURNE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer screening; Lynch syndrome; Magnetic resonance colonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; GENE MUTATION; HEREDITARY NONPOLYPOSIS COLORECTAL CANCER; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADAPTOR PROTEINS, SIGNAL TRANSDUCING; ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOMA; ADULT; AGED; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS, HEREDITARY NONPOLYPOSIS; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; DNA, NEOPLASM; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOTE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MUTATION; MUTS HOMOLOG 2 PROTEIN; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PILOT PROJECTS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650199518     PISSN: 13899600     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10689-010-9350-9     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. HJ Annie Yu KM Lin DM Ota, et al. 2003 Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: preventive management Cancer Treat Rev 29 6 461 470 10.1016/S0305-7372(03)00084-7 14585257 (Pubitemid 37428319)
2. J DeFrancisco 2003 Diagnosis and management of hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer Gastrointest Endosc 58 3 390 408 10.1067/S0016-5107(03)00014-2 14528214 (Pubitemid 38220239)
3. DC Chung AK Rustgi 2003 The hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: genetics and clinical implications Ann Intern Med 138 7 560 570 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXjtVejtLc%3D 12667026
4. HT Lynch A De la Chapelle 2003 Hereditary colorectal cancer N Engl J Med 348 10 919 932 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhvVOit7s%3D 10.1056/NEJMra012242 12621137 (Pubitemid 36298000)
5. HJ Järvinen M Aarnio H Mustonen, et al. 2000 Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer Gastroenterology 118 5 829 834 10.1016/S0016-5085(00)70168-5 10784581 (Pubitemid 30243745)
6. S Purkayastha PP Tekkis T Athanasiou, et al. 2005 Magnetic resonance colonography versus colonoscopy as a diagnostic investigation for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis Clin Radiol 60 9 980 989 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2MvlvVantA%3D%3D 10.1016/j.crad.2005.04.015 16124980 (Pubitemid 41194669)
7. DC Rockey E Paulson D Niedzwiecki, et al. 2005 Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison Lancet 365 9456 305 311 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FjvVWgtQ%3D%3D 15664225 (Pubitemid 40139107)
8. L Renkonen-Sinisalo A Kivisaari L Kivisaari, et al. 2007 Utility of computed tomographic colonography in surveillance for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome Fam Cancer 6 1 135 140 10.1007/s10689-007-9116-1 17273816 (Pubitemid 46295309)
9. PB Cotton VL Durkalski BC Pineau, et al. 2004 Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia JAMA 291 14 1713 1719 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjt1WktLk%3D 10.1001/jama.291.14.1713 15082698 (Pubitemid 38489893)
10. WH De Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel FM Nagengast G Griffioen, et al. 2002 Surveillance for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a long-term study on 114 families Dis Colon Rectum 45 12 1588 1594 10.1007/s10350-004-7244-3 12473880 (Pubitemid 35471007)
11. CH Viiala M Zimmerman DJE Cullen, et al. 2003 Complication rates of colonoscopy in an Australian teaching hospital environment Intern Med J 33 355 359 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szmtlejtQ%3D%3D 10.1046/j.1445-5994.2003.00397.x 12895166 (Pubitemid 37082795)
12. JP Mecklin HJ Jarvinen 2005 Surveillance in Lynch syndrome Fam Cancer 4 3 267 271 10.1007/s10689-005-1475-x 16136388 (Pubitemid 41242197)
13. G Pappalardo E Polettini FM Frattaroli, et al. 2000 Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions Gastroenterology 119 2 300 304 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3cvgtl2ltg%3D%3D 10.1053/gast.2000.9353 10930364 (Pubitemid 30621979)
14. D Hartmann B Bassler D Schilling, et al. 2006 Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy Radiology 238 1 143 149 10.1148/radiol.2381041756 16304088 (Pubitemid 43010590)
15. W Luboldt P Bauerfeind S Wildermuth, et al. 2000 Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography Radiology 216 2 383 388 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3cvgslSrtQ%3D%3D 10924558 (Pubitemid 30599854)
16. W Ajaj G Pelster U Treichel, et al. 2003 Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology Gut 52 1738 1743 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3srlsVSisQ%3D%3D 10.1136/gut.52.12.1738 14633953 (Pubitemid 37510395)
17. Yusuf E, Florie J, Nio CY et al. (2009) Incidental extracolonic findings on bright lumen MR colonography in a population at increased risk for colorectal carcinoma. Eur J Radiol Oct 15. Epub ahead of print
18. MP Achiam LP Holst Andersen M Klein, et al. 2009 Preoperative evaluation of synchronous colorectal cancer using MR colonography Acad Radiol 16 7 790 797 10.1016/j.acra.2009.01.023 19375956
19. CA Kuehle J Langhorst SC Ladd, et al. 2007 Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population Gut 56 8 1079 1085 10.1136/gut.2006.109306 17341542 (Pubitemid 47123237)
20. B Saar JM Gschossmann HM Bonel, et al. 2008 Evaluation of magnetic resonance colonography at 3.0 Tesla regarding diagnostic accuracy and image quality Invest Radiol 43 8 580 586 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31817e9af1 18648258
21. TC Lauenstein B Saar DR Martin 2007 MR colonography: 1.5T versus 3T Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15 3 395 402 10.1016/j.mric.2007.06.006 17893059 (Pubitemid 47432906)