Risk evaluation of mercury pollution

Mercury in the Environment: Pattern and Process

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 239-266

  Burger, Joanna ^a   Gochfeld, Michael ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867229045     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (213)

1. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 1999. Toxicological profi le for mercury. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control Prevention.
2. Bachman, R., A.L. Barton, J.R. Clark, P.L. deFur, S.J. Ells, S. J. Ells, C.A. Pittinger, M.W. Slimak, R.G. Stahl, and R.S. Wentsel. 1998. A multi-stakeholder framework for ecological risk management: summary from a SETAC technical workshop. Pensacola, FL: SETAC.
3. Barnthouse, L.W. 1992. The role of models in ecological risk assessment: a 1990s perspective. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 11:1751-1760.
4. Barnthouse, L.W. 1994. Issues in ecological risk assessment: the CRAM perspective. Risk Analysis 14:251-256.
5. Barnthouse, L.W., W.R. Munns, Jr., M.T. Sorensen. 2007. Population-level ecological risk assessment. Pensacola, FL: Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.
6. Barron, M.G., S.E. Duvall, and K.J. Barron. 2004. Retrospective and current risks of mercury to panthers in the Florida Everglades. Ecotoxicology 13:223-229.
7. Bartell, S.M., R.H. Gardner, and R.V. O'Neill. 1992. Ecological risk estimation. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.
8. Bascietto, J., D. Hinckley, J. Plafkin, and M. Slimak. 1990. Ecotoxicity and ecological risk assessment: regulatory applications at EPA. Environmental Science and Technology 24:10-14.
9. Beate, L., B. Stephan, and D. Gustav. 2010. Proposal for a revised reference 243concentration (RfC0 for mercury vapour in adults. Science of the Total Environment 408:3530-3535.
10. Bloom, N.S. 1991. On the chemical form of mercury in edible fish and marine invertebrate tissue. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49:1010-1017.
11. Boischio, A.A.P., and D.S. Henshel. 1996. Risk assessment of mercury exposure through fish consumption by the riverside people in the Madeira Basin, Amazon, 1991. Neurotoxicology 17:169-175.
12. Bradley, E.S., and G.W. Suter III. 2002. Screening evaluation of the ecological risks to terrestrial wildlife associated with a coal ash disposal site. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 8:637-656.
13. Brain, R.A., H. Sanderson, P.K. Sibley, and K.R. Solomon. 2006. Probabilistic ecological hazard assessment: evaluating pharmaceutical effects on aquatic higher plants as an example. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 64:128-135.
14. Bullard, R.D. 1990. Dumping in Dixie: race, class, and environmental quality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
15. Burger, J. 1997a. The historical basis for ecological risk assessment: preventive strategies for living in a chemical world. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 837:360-371.
16. Burger, J. 1997b. Methods for and approaches to evaluating susceptibility of ecological systems to hazardous chemicals. Environmental Health Perspectives 105:843-848.
17. Burger, J. 1999. Ecological risk assessment at the Department of Energy: an evolving process. International Journal of Toxicology 18:149-155.
18. Burger, J. 2006. Bioindicators: types, development, and use in ecological risk assessment and research. Environmental Bioindicators 1:22-39.
19. Burger, J. 2007. The effect of ecological systems of remediation to protect human health. American Journal of Public Health 97:1572-1578.
20. Burger, J. 2009. Risk to consumers from mercury in bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix) from New Jersey: size, season and geographical effects. Environmental Research 109:803-811.
21. Burger, J. 2011. Selenium: mercury molar ratios in fish from the Savannah River: implications for risk management. Journal of Risk Research. 201:1-18.
22. Burger, J., and K.R. Campbell. 2004. Species differences in contaminants in fish on and adjacent to the Oak Ridge Reservation, Tennessee. Environmental Research 96:145-155.
23. Burger, J., K.F. Gaines, and M. Gochfeld. 2001c. Ethnic differences in risk from mercury among Savannah River fishermen. Risk Analysis 21:533-544.
24. Burger, J., and M. Gochfeld. 1997a. Paradigms for ecological risk assessment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 837:372-386.
25. Burger, J., and M. Gochfeld. 1997b. Risk, mercury levels, and birds: relating adverse laboratory effects to field biomonitoring. Environmental Research 75:160-172.
26. Burger, J., and M. Gochfeld. 2001. On developing bioindicators for human and ecological health. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 66:23-46.
27. Burger, J., and M. Gochfeld. 2004a. Bioindicators for assessing human and ecological health. In: Environmental monitoring Wiersma G.B. (ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 541-566.
28. Burger, J., and M. Gochfeld. 2004b. Mercury in canned tuna: white versus light and temporal variation. Environmental Research 96:239-249.
29. Burger, J., and M. Gochfeld. 2004c. Metal levels in eggs of common terns (Sterna hirundo) in New Jersey: temporal trends from 1971 to 2002. Environmental Research 94: 336-343.
30. Burger, J., and M. Gochfeld. 2005. Heavy metals in commercial fish in New Jersey. Environmental Research 99:403-412.
31. Burger, J., and M. Gochfeld. 2006a. A framework and information needs for the management of the risks from consumption of self-caught fish. Environmental Research 101:275-285.
32. Burger, J., and M. Gochfeld. 2006b. Mercury in fish available in supermarkets in Illinois: are there regional differences. Science of the Total Environment 367:1010-1016.
33. Burger, J., and M. Gochfeld. 2007. Risk to consumers from mercury in Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus) from the Aleutians: fish age and size effects. Environmental Research 105:276-284.
34. Burger, J., and M. Gochfeld. 2011. Environmental justice: conceptual model for evaluating exposure pathways in low income, minority, Native American, and other unique exposure populations. American Journal of Public Health. 101: Suppl. 1:553-563.
35. Burger, J., and M. Gochfeld. 2011. Potential moderating effects of selenium on mercury uptake and selenium/mercury ratios in fish from Oak Ridge. Waste Management 2011.
36. Burger, J., and M. Gochfeld. (in press). Selenium and mercury ratios in saltwater fish from New Jersey: individual and species variations complicate possible use in human health consumption advisories. Environmental Research.
37. Burger, J., M. Gochfeld, C. Jeitner, S. Burke, T. Stamm, R. Snigaroff, D. Snigaroff, R. Patrick, and J. Weston. 2007a. Mercury levels and potential risk from subsistence foods from the Aleutians. Science of the Total Environment 384:93-105.
38. Burger, J., M. Gochfeld, C.W. Powers, D.S. Kosson, J. Halverson, G. Siekaniec, A. Morill, R. Patrick, L.D. Duffy, and D. Barnes. 2007b. Scientific research, stakeholders, and policy: continuing dialogue during research on radionuclides on Amchitka Island, Alaska. Journal of Environmental Management 85:232-244.
39. Burger, J., M. Gochfeld, C.W. Powers, L. Waishwell, C. Warren, and B.D. Goldstein. 2001a. Science, policy, stakeholders, and fish consumption advisories: developing a fish fact sheet for the Savannah River. Journal of Environmental Management 27:501-514.
40. Burger, J., S. Harris, B. Harper, and M. Gochfeld. 2010. Ecological information needs for environmental justice. Risk Analysis 30:893-905.
41. Burger, J., J. Hunter, and K. Cooper. 2001b. Using integrated food-web and population-based models for environmental monitoring, remediation decisions, and long-term planning. Remediation, 2001:87-102.
42. Burger, J., C.S. Stephens, S.C. Boring, M. Kuklinski, J.W. Gibbons, and M. Gochfeld. 1999. Factors in exposure assessment: ethnic and socioeconomic differences in fishing and consumption of fish caught along the Savannah River. Risk Analysis, 19:217-229.
43. Burger, J., A.H. Stern, and M. Gochfeld. 2005. Mercury in commercial fish: optimizing individual choices to reduce risk. Environmental Health Perspectives 113:266-271.
44. Cabanero, A.I., C. Carvalho, Y. Madrid, C. Batoreu, and C. Camara. 2005. Quantification and speciation of mercury and selenium in fish samples of high consumption in Spain and Portugal. Biological Trace Elements Research 103:17-35.
45. Cabanero, A.I., Y. Madrid, and C. Camara. 2007. Mercuryselenium species ratio in representative fish samples and their bioaccessibility by an in vitro digestion method. Biological Trace Element Research 119:195-211.
46. Callahan, M.A., and K. Sexton. 2007. If cumulative risk assessment is the answer, what is the question?. Environmental Health Perspectives 115:799-806.
47. Campbell, K.R., R.J. Dickey, R. Sexton, and J. Burger. 2002. Fishing along the Clinch River arm of Watts Bar Reservoir adjacent to the Oak Ridge Reservation, Tennessee: behavior, knowledge and risk perception. Science of the Total Environment 299:145-161.
48. Castilhos, Z.C., S. Rodrigues-Filho, A.P.C. Rodrigues, R.C. Villas-Boas, S. Siegel, M.M. Veiga, and C. Beinhoff. 2006. Mercury contamination in fish from gold mining areas in Indonesia and human health risk assessment. Science of the Total Environment 368:320-325.
49. CCMA. 2007. National Status and Trends Program: Mussel Watch. Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington DC. http://ccma.nos.noaa.gov/stressors/pollution/nsandt (accessed December 31, 2007).
50. Chapman, P.M., A. Fairbrother, and D. Brown. 1998. A critical evaluation of safety (uncertainty) factors for ecological risk assessment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 17:99-108.
51. Clark, J.R., K.H. Reinert, and P.B. Dorn. 1999. Development and application of benchmarks in ecological risk assessment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 18:1869-1870.
52. Constantinou, E., M. Gerath, D. Mitchell, C. Seigneur, and L. Levin. 1995. Mercury from power plants: a probabilistic approach to the evaluation of potential health risks. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 80:1129-1138.
53. Corburn, J. 2002. Environmental justice, local knowledge, and risk: the discourse of a community-based cumulative exposure assessment. Environmental Management 29:451-466.
54. Davidson, P.W., G.J. Myers, C. Cox, C. Axtell, C. Shamlaye, J. Sloane-Reeves, E. Cernichiari, L. Needham, A. Choi, Y. Wang, M. Berlin, and T.W. Clarkson. 1998. Effects of prenatal and postnatal methylmercury exposure from fish consumption on neurodevelopment: outcomes at 66 months of age in the Seychelles Child Development Study. Journal of the American Medical Association 26:701-707.
55. Davidson, P.W., G.J. Myers, C. Shamlaye, C. Cox, and G.E. Wilding. 2004. Prenatal exposure to methylmercury and child development: influence of social factors. Neurotoxicology and Teratology 26:553-559.
56. Davidson, P.W., G.J. Myers, B. Weiss, C.F. Shamlaye, and C. Cox. 2006. Prenatal methylmercury exposure from fish consumption and child development: a review of evidence and perspectives from the Seychelles Child Development Study. Neurotoxicology 27:1106-1109.
57. Davis, S., and J.C. Ogden. 1994. Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
58. DeForest, D.K., K.V. Brix, and W.J. Adams. 2007. Assessing metal bioaccumulation in aquatic environments: the inverse relationship between bioaccumulation factors, trophic transfer factors and exposure concentration. Aquatic Toxicology 84:236-246.
59. Denton, G.R.W., and C. Burdon-Jones. 1996. Trace metals in fish from the Great Barrier Reef. Marine Pollution Bulletin 17:201-209.
60. DiGuillio, R.T., and E. Monosson (eds.). 1996. Interconnections between human and ecosystem health. London: Chapman & Hall.
61. Donatuto, J., and B.L. Harper. 2008. Issues in evaluating fish consumption rates for Native American tribes. Risk Analysis 28:1497-1506.
62. Dorea, J.G. 2009. Studies of fish consumption as a source of methylmercury should consider fish-meal-fed farmed fish and other animal foods. Environmental Research 109:131-132.
63. Dorea, J.G. 2010. Research into mercury exposure and health education in subsistence fish-eating communities of the Amazon Basin: potential effects on public health policy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7:367-3477.
64. Driscoll, C.T., M. Abbot, R. Bullock, J. Jansen, D. Leonard, S. Lindberg, J. Munthe, N. Pirrone, and M. Niles. 2006. Airsheds and watersheds. In: Ecosystem responses to mercury contamination. Harris, R. Krabbenhoft, D.P. Mason, R. Murray, M.W. Reash, R. and Saltman, T. (eds.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 12-46.
65. Duvall, S.E., and M.G. Barron. 2000. A screening level probabilistic risk assessment of mercury in Florida Everglades food webs. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 47:298-305.
66. European Commission. 2008. Commission Regulations: setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in food stuffs. EC-No-629/2008. Geneva, Switzerland.
67. Ehrlich, R. 2001. The impact of pollution from a mercury processing plant in KwaZulu-Antal, South Africa, on the health of fish-eating communities in the area: an environmental health risk assessment. International Journal of Environmental Health Research 11:41-50.
68. Eisler, E. 2003. Health risks of gold miners: a synoptic review. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 25:325-345.
69. Elms, D.G. 1997. Risk balancing in structural problems. Structural Safety, 19:67-77.
70. European Food Safety Authority. 2004. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain [CONTAM] related to mercury and methylmercury in food. EFSA-Q-2003-030 Adopted: 24 February, 2004. EFSA Journal 34:1-14. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/scdoc/34.htm (accessed 9 Dec 2011).
71. FAO/WHO. 2003. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, Sixty-first meeting Rome, 10-19 June, 2003. Geneva Switzerland: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. JECFA/63SC.
72. Fiedler, N., J. Burger, and M. Gochfeld. 2007. Neurobehavioral toxicity. In: Public health and preventive medicine. Wallace, R.B. (ed.). New York: McGraw Hill, pp. 523-543.
73. Fisher, D.J., and D.T. Burton. 2004. Comparison of two U.S. environmental protection agency species sensitivity distribution methods for calculating ecological risk criteria. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 9:675-690.
74. Fitzgerald, W.F., and R.P. Mason. 1996. The global mercury cycle: oceanic and atmospheric aspects. In: Global and regional mercury cycles: sources, fluxes and mass balances. Baeyens, W. Ebinghaus, R. Vasiliev, O. (eds.). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, pp. 85-108.
75. Fung, Y., and M.P. Molvar. 1992. Toxicity of mercury from dental environment and from amalgam restorations. Journal of Toxicology 30:49-61.
76. Gilbert, T.L. 1984. Problems of risk balancing for regulating environmental hazards. U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report. Washington DC: National Technical Information Service. NTIS, PC A02/MF A01.
77. Ginsberg, G.I., and B.F. Toal. 2000. Development of a singlemeal fish consumption advisory for methylmercury. Risk Analysis 20:41-47.
78. Gochfeld, M. 2003. Cases of mercury exposure, bioavailability, and absorption. Ecotoxicology Environmental Safety 56:174-179.
79. Gochfeld, M., and J. Burger. 2005. Good fish/bad fish: a composite benefit-risk by dose curve. Neurotoxicology 26:511-520.
80. Gochfeld, M., and J. Burger. 2007. Environmental and ecological risk assessment. In: Public health and preventive medicine. Wallace, R.B. (ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 545-562.
81. Goldblum, D.K., A. Rak, M.D. Ponnapalli, and C.J. Clayton. 2006. The Fort Totten mercury pollution risk assessment: a case history. Journal of Hazardous Materials 136:406-417.
82. Grandjean, P., P. Weihe, R.F. White and F. Debes. 1998. Cognitive performance of children prenatally exposed to "safe" levels of methylmercury. Environmental Research 77:165-172.
83. Greenberg, M., J. Burger, M. Gochfeld, D. Kosson, K. Lowrie, H. Mayer, C.W. Powers, C.D. Volz, and V. Vyas. 2005. End-state land uses, sustainability protective systems, and risk management: a challenge for remediation and multigenerational stewardship. Remediation Winter: 91-105.
84. Groth, E. III. 2010. Ranking the contribution of commercial fish and shellfish varieties to mercury exposure in the United States: implications for risk communication. Environmental Research. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2009.12.006.
85. Harnly, M., S. Seidel, P. Rojas, R. Fornes, P. Flessel, D. Smith, R. Dreutzer, and L. Goldman. 1997. Biological monitoring for mercury within a community with soil and fish contamination. Environmental Health Perspectives 105:424-429.
86. Harris, S.G., and B.L. Harper. 1997. A Native American exposure scenario, and a tribal risk model. Risk Analysis 17:789-795.
87. Harris, R., D.P. Krabbenhoft, R. Mason, M.W. Murray, R. Reash, and T. Saltman (eds.). 2006. Ecosystem responses to mercury contamination. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
88. Hays, S.M., R.A. Becker, H.W. Leung, L.L. Aylward, and D.W. Pyatt. 2007. Biomonitoring equivalents: a screening approach for interpreting biomonitoring results from a public health perspective. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 47:96-109.
89. He, Q.L., Z.F. Yan, Q.H. Wang, and F.S. Li. 2006. The application of earthworm avoidance test in ecological risk assessment of naphthalene-contaminated soils. Journal of Agro-Environmental Science 26:538-543.
90. Hightower, J., and D. Moore. 2002. Mercury levels in highend consumers of fish. Environmental Health Perspectives 111:604-608.
91. Holloman, E.L., and M.C. Newman. 2006. A probabilistic assessment of mercury exposure to African Americans consuming local fish and shellfish. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 87:suppl 36.
92. Hughner, R.S., J.K. Maher, and N.M. Childs. 2008. Review of food policy and consumer issues of mercury in fish. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 27:185-194.
93. Hung, C.L.H., R.K.F. Lau, J.C.W. Lam, T.A. Jerrerson, S.K. Hung, M.H.W. Lam, and P.K.S. Lam. 2007. Risk assessment of trace elements in the stomach contents of Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins and finless porpoises in Hong Kong waters. Chemosphere 66:1175-1182.
94. Hunsaker, C.T., R.L. Graham, G.W. Suter II, R.V. O'Neill, L.W. Barnthouse, and R.H. Gardner. 1990. Assessing ecological risk on a regional scale. Journal of Environmental Management 14:325-332.
95. Hylander, L.D., E.C. Silva, L.J. Oliveira, S.A. Silva, E.K. Kuntze, and D.X. Silva. 1994. Mercury levels in Alto Pantanal: a screening study. Ambio 33:478-484.
96. Iannuzzi, T.J., T.N. Armstrong, J.B. Thelen, D.F. Ludwig, and C.D. Firstenberg. 2004. Chemical contamination of aquatic organisms from an urbanized river in the New York/New Jersey harbor estuary. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 10:389-413.
97. IOM (Institute of Medicine). 1991. Seafood Safety. National Academy Press, Wasington, DC.
98. IOM, 2006. Seafood choices: balancing benefits and risks. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
99. Iwata, T., M. Sakamoto, X. Feng, M. Yoshida, X.J. Liu, M. Dakeishi, P. Li, G. Qiu, H. Jiang, M. Nakamura, and M. Kaysuyuki. 2007. Effects of mercury vapor exposure on neuromotor function in Chinese miners and smelters. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 80: 381-387.
100. Jewett, S., C.X. Zhang, A.S. Naidu, J.J. Kelley, D. Dasher, and L.K. Duffy. 2003. Comparison of mercury and methylmercury in northern pike and Arctic grayling from western Alaska rivers. Chemosphere 50:381-392.
101. JECFA (Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives). 1999. Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. Fifty-third report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. WHO Technical Report Series 896. Geneva: World Health Organization, pp 87-93.
102. JECFA (Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives). 2003. Summary and conclusions of the sixtyfirst meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), pp. 18-22. http://www.who.int/pcs/jecfa/Summary61.pdf (accessed 18 Jan 2011).
103. JECFA. 2004. Methylmercury. In: Safety evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. Report of the 61st Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Geneva: World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety. WHO Technical Report Series 922, pp 132-139. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_922.pdf (accessed 1 Jan 2011).
104. JECFA. 2006. Methylmercury. Summary and conclusions of the 67th Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Geneva, World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety. WHO Technical Report Series 940. www.who.int/ipcs/food/jecfa/summaries/summary67.pdf (accessed February 23, 2012).
105. Johnston, J.J., and J.L. Snow. 2007. Population-based fish consumption survey and probabilistic methylmercury risk assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 13: 1214-1227.
106. Lackey, R.T. 1996. Is ecological risk assessment useful for resolving complex ecological problems? In: Pacific Salmon and their ecosystems: status and future options. Stouder, D.J. Bisson, P.A. and Naiman, R.J. (eds.). New York: Chapman & Hall, pp. 525-540.
107. Landrigan, P.J., A.L. Golden, and H.J. Simpson. 2006. Toxic substances and their impacts on human health in the Hudson River watershed. In: Hudson River Estuary. Levinton, J. S. and Waldman, J.R. (eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 413-427.
108. Lange, T.R., H.E. Royals, and L.L. Connor. 1994. Mercury accumulation in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) in a Florida lake. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 27:466-471.
109. Lansens, P., M. Leemakers and W. Vaeyens. 1991. Determination of methylmercury in fish by headspacegas chromatography with microwave-induced-plasma detection. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 56:103-115.
110. Loredo, J., A. Periera, and A. Ordonez. 2003. Untreated abandoned mercury mining works in a scenic area of Asturias (Spain). Environment International 29:481-491.
111. Mahaffey, K.R., R.P. Clickner, and R.A. Jeffries. 2009. Adult women's blood mercury concentrations vary regionally in the United States: association with patterns of fish consumption (NHANES, 1999-2004). Environmental Health Perspectives 117:47-53.
112. Maramba, N.P.C., J.P. Reyes, A.T. Francisco-Rivera, L.C.R. Panganiban, C. Dioquino, N. Dando, R. Timbang, H. Akagi, M.T. Castillo, C. Quitoriano, M. Afuang, A. Matsuyama, T. Eguich, and Y. Fuchigame. 2006. Environmental and human exposure assessment monitoring of communities near an abandoned mercury mine in the Philippines: a toxic legacy. Journal of Environmental Management 81:135-145.
113. Marins, R.V., J.B. DeAndrade, P.A. DeP.Pereira, E.C. Paiva, and H.H.M. Paraquetti. 2000. Sampling techniques for the assessment of anthropogenic vapour and particulate mercury in the Brazilian Amazon atmosphere. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 2:325-328.
114. Moore, D.R.J., B.E. Sample, G.W. Suter, B.R. Parkhurst, and R.S. Teed. 1999. A probabilistic risk assessment of the effects of methylmercury and PCBs on mink and kingfishers along East Fork Poplar Creek, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 18:2941-2953.
115. Mozaffarian, D. 2009. Fish, mercury, selenium and cardiovascular risk: current evidence and unanswered questions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 6:1894-1916.
116. Mueezzinoglu, A. 2003. A review of environmental consideration on gold mining and production. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 33:45-71.
117. Muir, D.C.G., R.G. Shearer, J. van Oosdam, S.G. Donaldson, and C. Furgal. 2005. Contaminants in Canadian arctic biota and implications for human health. Science of the Total Environment 351-352:539-546.
118. Myers, G.J., S.W. Thurston, A.T. Pearson, P.W. Davidson, C. Cox, C.F. Shanmlaye, E. Cernichiari, and T.W. Clarkson. 2009. Potential exposure to methylmercury from fish consumption: a review and new data from the Seychelles Child Development Study. Neurotoxicology 30:338-349.
119. Naito, W., Y. Gamo, and K. Yoshida. 2006. Screening-level risk assessment of Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate for aquatic organisms using monitoring data in Japan. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 115:451-471.
120. Newman, M.C. 1998. Fundamentals of ecotoxicology. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.
121. Nichols, J.W. 2001. Use of indicators in ecological risk assessment for persistent, bioaccumulative toxicants. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 7:1043-1057.
122. NJDEP (New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection). 2001. Final Report: NJ Mercury task force. Trenton, NJ.
123. Norton, S.B., D.J. Rodier, J.H. Gentile, W.H. van der Schalie, W.P. Wood and M.W. Slimak. 1992. A framework for ecological risk assessment for EPA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 11:1663-1672.
124. NRC, 1983. Risk assessment in the federal government. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
125. NRC, 1986. Ecological knowledge and environmental problemsolving. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
126. NRC, 1993. Issues in risk assessment. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
127. NRC, 1994. Building consensus through risk assessment and management of the Department of Energy's Environmental Remediation Program. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
128. NRC, 1996. Upstream: salmon and society in the Pacific Northwest. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
129. NRC, 2000a. Toxicological effects of methylmercury. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
130. NRC, 2000b. Ecological indicators for the nation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
131. NRC, 2009. Science and decisions: advancing risk assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
132. Odum, E.T., 1957. Fundamentals of ecology. Philadelphia: Saunders.
133. Pacyna, E.G., J.M. Pacyna, F. Steenhuisen, and S. Wilson. 2006. Global anthropogenic mercury emissions inventory for, 2000. Atmospheric Environment 40:4048-4063.
134. Paruchuri, Y., A. Siuniak, N. Johnson, E. Levin, K. Mitchell, J.M. Goodrich, E.P. Renne, and N. Basu. 2010. Occupational and environmental mercury exposure among small-scale gold miners in the Talensi-Nabdam District of Ghana's Upper East region. Science of the Total Environment 408: 6079-6085.
135. Payne, R.T. 1966. Food web complexity and species diversity. American Naturalist 100:65-75.
136. Peakall, D. 1992. Animal biomarkers as pollution indicators. London: Chapman & Hall.
137. Pinheiro, M.C.N., J.L.M. de Nascimento, L.C.L. Silveira, J.B.T. daRocha, and M. Aschner. 2009. Mercury and selenium - a review on aspects related to the health of human populations in the Amazon. Environmental Bioindicators 4:222-245.
138. Power, M., and L.S. McCarty. 1997. Fallacies in ecological risk assessment practices. Environmental Sciences and Technology 31:370A-375A.
139. PCCRARM, 1997. Framework for environmental health risk assessment. Washington DC: US Congress.
140. Ralston, N.V.C. 2008. Selenium health benefit values as seafood safety criteria. Eco-Health 5: 442-455.
141. Ralston, N.V.C. 2009. Introduction to 2nd issue on special topic: selenium and mercury as interactive environmental indicators. Environmental Bioindicators 4:286-290.
142. Ralston, N.V., and L.J. Raymond. 2010. Dietary selenium's protective effects against methylmercury toxicity. Toxicology 278:112-123.
143. Ralston, N.V.C., C.R. Ralston, J. L. Blackwell III, and L.J. Raymond. 2008. Dietary and tissue selenium in relation to methylmercury toxicity. Neurotoxicology 29:802-811.
144. Rasmussen, N.C. 1981. The application of probabilistic risk assessment techniques to energy technologies. Annual Review of Energy 6:123-138.
145. Rice, G., J. Swartout, K. Mahaffey, and R. Schoeny. 2000. Deviation of U.S. EPA's oral Reference Dose (RfD) for methylmercury. Drug Chemistry and Toxicology 23:41-54.
146. Riley, D.M., C.A. Newby, T.O. Leal-Almeraz, and V.M. Thomas. 2001. Assessing elemental mercury vapor exposure from cultural and religious practices. Environmental Health Perspectives 109:779-784.
147. Rojas, M., D. Siejas, O. Agreda, and M. Rodriguez. 2006. Biological monitoring of mercury exposure in individuals referred to a toxicological center in Venezuela. Science of the Total Environment 354:278-285.
148. Rothschild, R.F.N., and L.K. Duffy. 2002. Preliminary study on total mercury in the common prepared subsistence foods of a rural Alaskan village. Alaska Medicine 2002 44:89-103.
149. Rowe, G., and L.H. Frewer. 2000. Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values 25:3-29.
150. Ruckelshaus, W.D. 1985. Risk, science and democracy. Issues in Science and Technology 1:19-38.
151. Rumbold, D. 2005. A probabilistic risk assessment of the effects of methylmercury on great egrets and bald eagles foraging at a constructed wetland in South Florida relative to the Everglades. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 2:365-388.
152. Satoh, H., N. Yasuda, and S. Shimai. 1985. Development of refl exes in neonatal mice prenatally exposed to methylmercury and selenite. Toxicological Letters 25:199-203.
153. Scherer, A.C., A. Tsuchiya, L.R. Younglove, T.M. Burbacher, and E. M. Faustman. 2008. Comparative analysis of state fish consumption advisories targeting sensitive populations. Environmental Health Perspectives 116:1598-1606.
154. Schierow, L.-J. 2004. Mercury in the environment: sources and health risks. CRS Report for Congress. http://ncseonline.org/NLE/CRSreports/04Jun/RL32420.pdf (accessed 6 Oct 2011).
155. Schoeny, R. 1996. Use of genetic toxicology data in U.S. EPA risk assessment: mercury study report as an example. Environmental Health Perspectives 104:Suppl 3:663-674.
156. Seigneur, C., P. Pai, M. Gerath, D. Mitchell, G. Hamby, G. Gong, C. Whipple, and L. Levin. 2006. Probabilistic assessment of regional mercury exposure. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 97:159-168.
157. Selin, N.E., E.M. Sunderland, C.D. Knightes, and R.P. Mason. 2010. Sources of mercury exposure for U.S. seafood consumers: implications for policy. Environmental Health Perspectives 118:137-143.
158. SFWMD (South Florida Water Management District). 2007. South Florida Environmental Report: 2007. G. Redfield (ed.). West Palm Beach, FL: SFWMD.
159. SFWMD (South Florida Water Management District). 2010. South Florida Environmental Report: 2010. G. Redfield (ed.). West Palm Beach, FL. SFWMD.
160. Sheehan, P.J. 1984. Effects on community and ecosystem structure and dynamics. In: Effects of pollutants at the ecosystem level. P.J. Sheehan, D.R. Miller, G.C. Butler and P. Bourdeau (eds.). Chichester, England: Wiley, 22: 51-100.
161. Sheridan, S.K., T.G. Townsend, J.L. Price, and J.T. Connell. 2000. Policy options for hazardous-building-component removal before demolition. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management 4:111-117.
162. Shimshack, J.P., M.B. Ward, and T.K.M. Beatty. 2007. Mercury advisories: information, education, and fish consumption. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53:158-179.
163. Shim, S.M., M. Ferruzzi, Y.C. Kim, E.M. Janie, and C.R. Santerre. 2009. Impact of phytochemical-rich foods on bioaccessibility of mercury from fish. Food Chemistry 112:46-50.
164. Shipp, A.M., P.R. Gentry, P.R. Gentry, G. Lawrence, C. Van Landingham, T. Covington, H.J. Clewell, K. Gribben, and K. Crump. 2000. Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations. Toxicology and Industrial Health 16:335-438.
165. Sorensen, M.T., W.R. Gala, and J.A. Margolin. 2004. Approaches to ecological risk characterization and management: selecting the right tools for the job. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 10:245-269.
166. Steevens, J.A., M.R. Reiss, and A.V. Pawlisz. 2005. A methodology for deriving tissue residue benchmarks for aquatic biota: a case study for fish exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-pdioxin and equivalents. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 1:142-151.
167. Stern, A.H. 2005. A revised probabilistic estimate of the maternal methylmercury intake dose corresponding to a measured cord blood mercury concentration. Environmental Health Perspectives 113:155-163.
168. Sunderland, E.M. 2007. Mercury exposure from domestic and imported estuarine and marine fish in the U.S. seafood market. Environmental Health Perspectives 115:235-242.
169. Sunderland, E.M., M. Cohen, N.E. Selin, and G.L. Chmura. 2008. Reconciling models and measurements to assess trends in atmospheric mercury deposition. Environmental Pollution 156:526-535.
170. Suter, G.W. II. 1996. Toxicological benchmarks for screening contaminants of potential concern for effects on freshwater biota. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 7:1232-1241.
171. Suter, G.W. II. 2001. Applicability of indicator monitoring to ecological risk assessment. Ecological Indicators 1:101-112.
172. Suter, G.W. II, R.A. Efroymson, B.E. Sample, and D.S. Jones. 2000. Ecological risk assessment for contaminated sites. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.
173. Suter, G.W. II, T. Vermeire, W.R. Munns, Jr., and J. Sekizawa. 2003. Framework for an integration of health and ecological risk assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 9:281-301.
174. Suter, G W. II, T. Vermeire, W.R. Munns, Jr., and J. Sekizawa. 2005. An integrated framework for health and ecological risk assessment. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 207:611-616.
175. Swain, E.B., P.M. Jakus, G. Rice, F. Lupi, P.A. Maxson, J.M. Pacyna, A. Penn, S.J. Spiegel, and M.M. Veiga. 2007. Socioeconomic consequences of mercury use and pollution. Ambio 36:45-61.
176. Tannenbaum, I., M. Johnson, and M. Bazar. 2003. Application of the hazard quotient in remedial decisions: a comparison of human and ecological risk assessments. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 9:387-401.
177. Tardiff, R.G., and B.D. Goldstein. 1992. Methods for assessing exposure of human and non-human biota. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
178. Toth, J.F. Jr., and R.B. Brown. 1997. Racial and gender meanings of why people participate in recreational fishing. Leisure Science 19:129-146.
179. Tran, N.L., L. Barraj, K. Smith, A. Javier, and T.A. Burke. 2004. Combining food frequency and survey data to quantify long-term dietary exposure: a methylmercury case study. Risk Analysis 24:19-30.
180. Ullrich, S.M., M.A. Ilyushchenko, T.W. Tanton, and G.A. Uskov. 2007. Mercury contamination in the vicinity of a derelict chlor-alkali plant. Part II: contamination of the aquatic and terrestrial food chain and potential risks to the local population. In Mercury contaminated sites: characterization, risk assessment and remediation. Science of the Total Environment 381:1-26.
181. USACOE, 1996. Risk assessment handbook. Volume II: Environmental evaluations. EM200-14. Washington DC: USACOE.
182. USDOE, 2009. Environmental justice at the U.S. Department of Energy. www.lm.doe.gov/env_justice/ (accessed 8 Sept 2011).
183. USDOI, 1986. Natural resource damage assessments: final: final rule. Federal Register 51:27646-27753.
184. USEPA, 1986. Risk assessment guidelines for carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, complex mixtures, suspect developmental toxicants, and estimating exposures. Federal Register 51:33992-34054.
185. USEPA. 1995. Integrated Risk Information System-Mercury, elemental. http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0370.htm.
186. USEPA, 1997. Ecological risk assessment guidance for superfund process for designing and conducting ecological risk assessments. Washington, DC: USEPA.
187. USEPA, 2001. Ecological risk assessment bulletins-supplement to RAGS, region 4. Washington, DC: USEPA.
188. USEPA, 2001a. Freshwater criterion for fish. http://www.epa.gov/fedgstr/EPA-WATER/2001/January/Day-08/w217.htm (accessed 7 Jan 2011).
189. USEPA, 2001b. Integrated risk information system: methylmercury MeHg. http://www.epa.gov/ncea/iris/subst/0073.htm (accessed 14 Feb 2011).
190. USEPA, 2006. Integrated risk information system data base for methylmercury. www.epa.gov/iris (accessed 20 Nov 2011).
191. USEPA, 2009a. Environmental justice: compliance and enforcement. http://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice (accessed 30 July 2011).
192. USEPA, 2009b. Integrated risk information system: site help and tools-glossary. http://www.epa.gov/iris/help_gloss.htm (accessed 1 Jan 2011).
193. USEPA, 2010. Superfund risk assessment: human health: exposure assessment. http://www.epa.gov/answer/riskassessment/index.htm (accessed 1 Aug 2011).
194. USFDA, 2001. FDA consumer advisory. Washington, DC: U.S. Food and Drug Administration. http//www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/2000/advisory.html (accessed December 1, 2001).
195. USFDA, 2003. FDA consumer advisory. Washington, DC: U.S. Food and Drug Administration. http//www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/2000/advisory.html (1 January 1, 2004);2003.
196. USFDA, 2005. Mercury levels in commercial fish and shellfish. Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration. http//www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/2000/advisory.html (accessed 1 January 1, 2005).
197. USFDA, 2006 (updated). Mercury concentrations in fish: FDA monitoring program, 1990-2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available http//www.fda.gov/~dms/admehg3.html. (accessed 2 December 2, 2007).
198. Van der Schalie, W.H., H.S. Gardner, J.A. Bantle, C.T. DeRose, R.A. Finch, J.S. Reif, R. H. Reuter, L.C. Backer, J. Burger, L.C. Folmar, and W.S. Stokes. 1999. Animals as sentinels of human health hazards of environmental chemicals. Environmental Health Perspectives 107:309-315.
199. Washburn, S.T., C.F. Kleiman, and D.E. Arsnow. 1998. Applying USEPA risk assessment guidance in the 90s. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 4:763-774.
200. Watanabe, C., K. Yin, Y. Kasanuma, and H. Satoh. 1999. In utero exposure to methylmercury and Se deficiency converge on the neurobehavioral outcome in mice. Neurotoxicology and Teratology 21: 83-88.
201. Wendroff, A.P. 1995. Magico-religious mercury use and cultural sensitivity. American Journal of Public Health 85:409-410.
202. Wheatley, B., and M.A. Wheatley. 2000. Methylmercury and the health of indigenous peoples: a risk management challenge for physical and social sciences, and for public health policy. Science of the Total Environment 259:23-29.
203. WHO, 2005. Policy paper: mercury in health care. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO/SDE/WSH/05.08). http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health (accessed 7 Feb 2011).
204. WHO, 2007. Preventing disease through healthy environments: exposure to mercury: a major public health concern. World Health Organization Mercury Flyer. http://www.who.int/phe/news/Mercury-flyer.pdf (accessed 18 Jan 2011).
205. Wiegers, J.K., H.M. Feder, L.S. Mortensen, D.G. Shaw, V.J. Wilson, and W.G. Landis. 1998. A regional multi-stressor rank-based ecological risk assessment for the Fjord of Port Valdez, Alaska. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 4:1125-1173.
206. Willett, W.C. 2005. Balancing health risks and benefits. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 29:321-321.
207. Williams, B.L., and M.S. Magsumbol. 2007. Emergency preparedness among people living near U.S. Army chemical weapons sites after September 11, 2001. American Journal of Public Health 97:1601-1607.
208. Wilson, E.O. 1986. Biodiversity. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
209. Wilson, M.V., and L.E. Lantz. 2000. Issues and framework for building successful science-management teams for natural areas management. Natural Areas Journal 20:381-385.
210. Wolfe, M.F., T. Atkeson, W. Bowerman, J. Burger, D.C. Evers, M. Murray, and E. Zillioux. 2006. Wildlife indicators. In: Ecosystem responses to mercury contamination. Harris, R. Krabbenhoft, D.P. Mason, R. Murray, M.W. Reash, R. and Saltman, T. (eds.). Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, pp. 123-190.
211. Zartarian, V.G., and B.D. Schultz. 2009. The EPA's human exposure research program for assessing cumulative risk in communities. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 2009:1-8.
212. Zeeman, M., and J. Gilford. 1993. Ecological hazard evaluation and risk assessment under EPA's Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA): an introduction. In: Toxicology and risk assessment. Landis, W.G. J.S. Hughes, and M.A. Lewis (eds.). Philadelphia: American Society of Testing and Materials, Vol. 1, pp. 7-21.
213. Zhang, H., X. Feng, T. Larrsen, T. Qiu, and R. Vogt. 2010. In inland China, rice, rather than fish, is the major pathway for methylmercury exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives 118:1183-1188.